Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms
Normative naturalism is primarily a metaphysical doctrine: there are normative facts and properties, and these fall into the class of natural facts and properties. Many objections to naturalism rely on additional assumptions about language or thought, but often without adequate consideration of just...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | CS EN SK |
Publicado: |
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28302 https://doaj.org/article/5c0be7b002094e929789796edbed2e03 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5c0be7b002094e929789796edbed2e03 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5c0be7b002094e929789796edbed2e032021-11-30T16:14:31ZNormative Naturalism on Its Own Termshttps://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.283021335-06682585-7150https://doaj.org/article/5c0be7b002094e929789796edbed2e032021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09211020orgf.2021.28302.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1335-0668https://doaj.org/toc/2585-7150Normative naturalism is primarily a metaphysical doctrine: there are normative facts and properties, and these fall into the class of natural facts and properties. Many objections to naturalism rely on additional assumptions about language or thought, but often without adequate consideration of just how normative properties would have to figure in our thought and talk if naturalism were true. In the first part of the paper, I explain why naturalists needn’t think that normative properties can be represented or ascribed in wholly non-normative terms. If so, certain prominent objections to normative naturalism fail. In the second part, I consider the objection that normative properties are “just too different” from (other) natural properties to themselves be natural properties. I argue that naturalists have no distinctive trouble making sense of thought and talk involving forms of “genuine” or “authoritative” normativity which can drive a non-question-begging form of the objection.Pekka VäyrynenInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciencesarticleauthoritative normativitynormative conceptsnormative naturalismone-term naturalismpractical normativityPhilosophy (General)B1-5802CSENSKOrganon F, Vol 28, Iss 3, Pp 505-530 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
CS EN SK |
topic |
authoritative normativity normative concepts normative naturalism one-term naturalism practical normativity Philosophy (General) B1-5802 |
spellingShingle |
authoritative normativity normative concepts normative naturalism one-term naturalism practical normativity Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Pekka Väyrynen Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms |
description |
Normative naturalism is primarily a metaphysical doctrine: there are normative facts and properties, and these fall into the class of natural facts and properties. Many objections to naturalism rely on additional assumptions about language or thought, but often without adequate consideration of just how normative properties would have to figure in our thought and talk if naturalism were true. In the first part of the paper, I explain why naturalists needn’t think that normative properties can be represented or ascribed in wholly non-normative terms. If so, certain prominent objections to normative naturalism fail. In the second part, I consider the objection that normative properties are “just too different” from (other) natural properties to themselves be natural properties. I argue that naturalists have no distinctive trouble making sense of thought and talk involving forms of “genuine” or “authoritative” normativity which can drive a non-question-begging form of the objection. |
format |
article |
author |
Pekka Väyrynen |
author_facet |
Pekka Väyrynen |
author_sort |
Pekka Väyrynen |
title |
Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms |
title_short |
Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms |
title_full |
Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms |
title_fullStr |
Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Normative Naturalism on Its Own Terms |
title_sort |
normative naturalism on its own terms |
publisher |
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28302 https://doaj.org/article/5c0be7b002094e929789796edbed2e03 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pekkavayrynen normativenaturalismonitsownterms |
_version_ |
1718406446425571328 |