Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1367–1372. On page 1367, the final sentence of the Introduction which reads: “The purpose of this study was simply to compare the CDE between the single Centurion and single Infiniti phacoemulsificatio...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5c0db7b221db4ba8808fa782aad29ee0 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1367–1372. On page 1367, the final sentence of the Introduction which reads: “The purpose of this study was simply to compare the CDE between the single Centurion and single Infiniti phacoemulsification systems in a larger number of cases to see which one uses less CDE under similar age, sex, and complication rate (P>0.05) among five surgeons in one surgical center.” Should read:“The purpose of this study is to compare the mean CDE and complication rate of the Centurion and Infiniti phacoemulsification systems.”On page 1370 there were errors in both Figures 1 and 2. The correct figures are presented here. Read the original article |
|---|