Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]

Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1367–1372.  On page 1367, the final sentence of the Introduction which reads:  “The purpose of this study was simply to compare the CDE between the single Centurion and single Infiniti phacoemulsificatio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, Chen JJ, Patrianakos T
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:	Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5c0db7b221db4ba8808fa782aad29ee0
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5c0db7b221db4ba8808fa782aad29ee0
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5c0db7b221db4ba8808fa782aad29ee02021-12-02T02:04:22ZComparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/5c0db7b221db4ba8808fa782aad29ee02015-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/corrigendum-comparison-of-cumulative-dissipated-energy-between-th-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1367–1372.  On page 1367, the final sentence of the Introduction which reads:  “The purpose of this study was simply to compare the CDE between the single Centurion and single Infiniti phacoemulsification systems in a larger number of cases to see which one uses less CDE under similar age, sex, and complication rate (P>0.05) among five surgeons in one surgical center.”    Should read:“The purpose of this study is to compare the mean CDE and complication rate of the Centurion and Infiniti phacoemulsification systems.”On page 1370 there were errors in both Figures 1 and 2. The correct figures are presented here. Read the original articleChen MAnderson EHill GChen JJPatrianakos TDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2015, Iss default, Pp 1475-1476 (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	Ophthalmology RE1-994 Chen M Anderson E Hill G Chen JJ Patrianakos T Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
description	Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, et al. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1367–1372.  On page 1367, the final sentence of the Introduction which reads:  “The purpose of this study was simply to compare the CDE between the single Centurion and single Infiniti phacoemulsification systems in a larger number of cases to see which one uses less CDE under similar age, sex, and complication rate (P>0.05) among five surgeons in one surgical center.”    Should read:“The purpose of this study is to compare the mean CDE and complication rate of the Centurion and Infiniti phacoemulsification systems.”On page 1370 there were errors in both Figures 1 and 2. The correct figures are presented here. Read the original article
format	article
author	Chen M Anderson E Hill G Chen JJ Patrianakos T
author_facet	Chen M Anderson E Hill G Chen JJ Patrianakos T
author_sort	Chen M
title	Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
title_short	Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
title_full	Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
title_fullStr	Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
title_sort	comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the infiniti and centurion phacoemulsification systems [corrigendum]
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/5c0db7b221db4ba8808fa782aad29ee0
work_keys_str_mv	AT chenm comparisonofcumulativedissipatedenergybetweentheinfinitiandcenturionphacoemulsificationsystemscorrigendum AT andersone comparisonofcumulativedissipatedenergybetweentheinfinitiandcenturionphacoemulsificationsystemscorrigendum AT hillg comparisonofcumulativedissipatedenergybetweentheinfinitiandcenturionphacoemulsificationsystemscorrigendum AT chenjj comparisonofcumulativedissipatedenergybetweentheinfinitiandcenturionphacoemulsificationsystemscorrigendum AT patrianakost comparisonofcumulativedissipatedenergybetweentheinfinitiandcenturionphacoemulsificationsystemscorrigendum
_version_	1718402710526492672

Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]

Ejemplares similares