A New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps
A clear gap was identified in the literature regarding the in-depth evaluation of scaling up thermal energy storage components. To cover such a gap, a new methodological approach was developed and applied to a novel latent thermal energy storage module. The purpose of this paper is to identify some...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5c3118cac625428f84a4f5e0d97eeb70 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5c3118cac625428f84a4f5e0d97eeb70 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5c3118cac625428f84a4f5e0d97eeb702021-11-25T17:25:49ZA New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps10.3390/en142274701996-1073https://doaj.org/article/5c3118cac625428f84a4f5e0d97eeb702021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7470https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073A clear gap was identified in the literature regarding the in-depth evaluation of scaling up thermal energy storage components. To cover such a gap, a new methodological approach was developed and applied to a novel latent thermal energy storage module. The purpose of this paper is to identify some key aspects to be considered when scaling up the module from lab-scale to full-scale using different performance indicators calculated in both charge and discharge. Different normalization methods were applied to allow an appropriate comparison of the results at both scales. As a result of the scaling up, the theoretical energy storage capacity increases by 52% and 145%, the average charging power increases by 21% and 94%, while the average discharging power decreases by 16% but increases by 36% when mass and volume normalization methods are used, respectively. When normalization by the surface area of heat transfer is used, all of the above performance indicators decrease, especially the average discharging power, which decreases by 49%. Moreover, energy performance in charge and discharge decreases by 17% and 15%, respectively. However, efficiencies related to charging, discharging, and round-trip processes are practically not affected by the scaling up.Gabriel ZsembinszkiBoniface Dominick MselleDavid VérezEmiliano BorriAndreas StrehlowBirgo NitschAndrea FrazzicaValeria PalombaLuisa F. CabezaMDPI AGarticlelatent thermal energy storagephase change material (PCM)performance indicatorsscaling upexperimental evaluationheat pumpTechnologyTENEnergies, Vol 14, Iss 7470, p 7470 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
latent thermal energy storage phase change material (PCM) performance indicators scaling up experimental evaluation heat pump Technology T |
spellingShingle |
latent thermal energy storage phase change material (PCM) performance indicators scaling up experimental evaluation heat pump Technology T Gabriel Zsembinszki Boniface Dominick Mselle David Vérez Emiliano Borri Andreas Strehlow Birgo Nitsch Andrea Frazzica Valeria Palomba Luisa F. Cabeza A New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps |
description |
A clear gap was identified in the literature regarding the in-depth evaluation of scaling up thermal energy storage components. To cover such a gap, a new methodological approach was developed and applied to a novel latent thermal energy storage module. The purpose of this paper is to identify some key aspects to be considered when scaling up the module from lab-scale to full-scale using different performance indicators calculated in both charge and discharge. Different normalization methods were applied to allow an appropriate comparison of the results at both scales. As a result of the scaling up, the theoretical energy storage capacity increases by 52% and 145%, the average charging power increases by 21% and 94%, while the average discharging power decreases by 16% but increases by 36% when mass and volume normalization methods are used, respectively. When normalization by the surface area of heat transfer is used, all of the above performance indicators decrease, especially the average discharging power, which decreases by 49%. Moreover, energy performance in charge and discharge decreases by 17% and 15%, respectively. However, efficiencies related to charging, discharging, and round-trip processes are practically not affected by the scaling up. |
format |
article |
author |
Gabriel Zsembinszki Boniface Dominick Mselle David Vérez Emiliano Borri Andreas Strehlow Birgo Nitsch Andrea Frazzica Valeria Palomba Luisa F. Cabeza |
author_facet |
Gabriel Zsembinszki Boniface Dominick Mselle David Vérez Emiliano Borri Andreas Strehlow Birgo Nitsch Andrea Frazzica Valeria Palomba Luisa F. Cabeza |
author_sort |
Gabriel Zsembinszki |
title |
A New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps |
title_short |
A New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps |
title_full |
A New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps |
title_fullStr |
A New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps |
title_full_unstemmed |
A New Methodological Approach for the Evaluation of Scaling Up a Latent Storage Module for Integration in Heat Pumps |
title_sort |
new methodological approach for the evaluation of scaling up a latent storage module for integration in heat pumps |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/5c3118cac625428f84a4f5e0d97eeb70 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gabrielzsembinszki anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT bonifacedominickmselle anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT davidverez anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT emilianoborri anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT andreasstrehlow anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT birgonitsch anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT andreafrazzica anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT valeriapalomba anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT luisafcabeza anewmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT gabrielzsembinszki newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT bonifacedominickmselle newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT davidverez newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT emilianoborri newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT andreasstrehlow newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT birgonitsch newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT andreafrazzica newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT valeriapalomba newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps AT luisafcabeza newmethodologicalapproachfortheevaluationofscalingupalatentstoragemoduleforintegrationinheatpumps |
_version_ |
1718412351832588288 |