Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille

In France, the duty ‘to protect persons threatened in their country’ is based on an impartial examination of the asylum application, the right to remain on the territory and to dignified reception conditions for the duration of the examination. However, the testimonies collected by the Marseille Asy...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Béatrice Mésini, Margot Bonis
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR
Publicado:	Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille 2021
Materias:	right to asylum material reception conditions vulnerability inhospitality judicialization Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5c3dd1c30a1a44e2a69cdd780ac0e4e2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5c3dd1c30a1a44e2a69cdd780ac0e4e2
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5c3dd1c30a1a44e2a69cdd780ac0e4e22021-12-02T10:51:27ZDes solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille0755-78092104-375210.4000/eps.11909https://doaj.org/article/5c3dd1c30a1a44e2a69cdd780ac0e4e22021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/eps/11909https://doaj.org/toc/0755-7809https://doaj.org/toc/2104-3752In France, the duty ‘to protect persons threatened in their country’ is based on an impartial examination of the asylum application, the right to remain on the territory and to dignified reception conditions for the duration of the examination. However, the testimonies collected by the Marseille Asylum Observatory show that there are "systemic failures" in the administrative and logistical processing, which violate the "human dignity" and "integrity" of persons. We will analyse the 60 stories collected from asylum seekers and accompanying persons in 2017-2018 in order to grasp the modalities of wandering and abandonment of people. As a counterpoint, we will update the solidarity initiated by various actors (employees, activists, volunteers, and citizens), which is exercised in extenso by linking the city with vital information concerning access to basic needs. Finally, we will choose five judgements from the administrative Court of appeal of Marseille and the Council of State, which confirm or invalidate the rejection of material reception conditions, while prioritising and proportioning the rights and duties of guests.Béatrice MésiniMargot BonisUniversité des Sciences et Technologies de Lillearticleright to asylummaterial reception conditionsvulnerabilityinhospitalityjudicializationGeography. Anthropology. RecreationGSocial sciences (General)H1-99ENFREspace populations sociétés, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR
topic	right to asylum material reception conditions vulnerability inhospitality judicialization Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	right to asylum material reception conditions vulnerability inhospitality judicialization Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Social sciences (General) H1-99 Béatrice Mésini Margot Bonis Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille
description	In France, the duty ‘to protect persons threatened in their country’ is based on an impartial examination of the asylum application, the right to remain on the territory and to dignified reception conditions for the duration of the examination. However, the testimonies collected by the Marseille Asylum Observatory show that there are "systemic failures" in the administrative and logistical processing, which violate the "human dignity" and "integrity" of persons. We will analyse the 60 stories collected from asylum seekers and accompanying persons in 2017-2018 in order to grasp the modalities of wandering and abandonment of people. As a counterpoint, we will update the solidarity initiated by various actors (employees, activists, volunteers, and citizens), which is exercised in extenso by linking the city with vital information concerning access to basic needs. Finally, we will choose five judgements from the administrative Court of appeal of Marseille and the Council of State, which confirm or invalidate the rejection of material reception conditions, while prioritising and proportioning the rights and duties of guests.
format	article
author	Béatrice Mésini Margot Bonis
author_facet	Béatrice Mésini Margot Bonis
author_sort	Béatrice Mésini
title	Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille
title_short	Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille
title_full	Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille
title_fullStr	Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille
title_full_unstemmed	Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille
title_sort	des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à marseille
publisher	Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/5c3dd1c30a1a44e2a69cdd780ac0e4e2
work_keys_str_mv	AT beatricemesini dessolidaritesinextensopourunasileinextremisdegradationdesconditionsmateriellesdaccueilamarseille AT margotbonis dessolidaritesinextensopourunasileinextremisdegradationdesconditionsmateriellesdaccueilamarseille
_version_	1718396532368080896

Des solidarités in extenso pour un asile in extremis. Dégradation des conditions matérielles d’accueil à Marseille

Ejemplares similares