Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device

The development of the JHR experimental devices rely on the operational feedback from previous French material testing reactors (i.e. SILOE and OSIRIS). The experimental devices used for the irradiation of structural material were already facing technological limitations, in particular regarding the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanchet David, Antony Muriel, Carcreff Hubert, François Sébastien, Guimbal Philippe, Pouchin Bernard
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5c4e325e98ac40c28b7fc59f3f188edc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5c4e325e98ac40c28b7fc59f3f188edc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5c4e325e98ac40c28b7fc59f3f188edc2021-12-02T17:12:46ZAssessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device2100-014X10.1051/epjconf/202125304010https://doaj.org/article/5c4e325e98ac40c28b7fc59f3f188edc2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2021/07/epjconf_animma2021_04010.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2100-014XThe development of the JHR experimental devices rely on the operational feedback from previous French material testing reactors (i.e. SILOE and OSIRIS). The experimental devices used for the irradiation of structural material were already facing technological limitations, in particular regarding the control of irradiation temperature and of the thermal gradients in the experimental samples, which is essential to ensure the quality of the experiments. Obtaining satisfactory thermal fields (in compliance with the setpoint and the homogeneity) is all the more difficult as the level of nuclear heating is higher in the JHR. This paper attempts to characterize the irradiation conditions in different experimental positions of the JHR and to compare them with the conditions and the empirical criteria of maximum acceptable temperature measured in OSIRIS. The study shows that the irradiation conditions obtained inside the experimental devices can sometimes be significantly different from the measured conditions using instrumentation devices. The interpretation of the experimental results and their transposition to other situations will always require a calculation versus measurement adjustment and the intensive use of computer simulation. However, despite all simulation and transposition efforts, the control of temperature conditions is not yet fully demonstrated and nothing will ultimately replace experimental validation.Blanchet DavidAntony MurielCarcreff HubertFrançois SébastienGuimbal PhilippePouchin BernardEDP Sciencesarticlematerial test reactor (mtr)differential calorimeterexperimental devicesreactor pressure vessel (rpv)PhysicsQC1-999ENEPJ Web of Conferences, Vol 253, p 04010 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic material test reactor (mtr)
differential calorimeter
experimental devices
reactor pressure vessel (rpv)
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle material test reactor (mtr)
differential calorimeter
experimental devices
reactor pressure vessel (rpv)
Physics
QC1-999
Blanchet David
Antony Muriel
Carcreff Hubert
François Sébastien
Guimbal Philippe
Pouchin Bernard
Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device
description The development of the JHR experimental devices rely on the operational feedback from previous French material testing reactors (i.e. SILOE and OSIRIS). The experimental devices used for the irradiation of structural material were already facing technological limitations, in particular regarding the control of irradiation temperature and of the thermal gradients in the experimental samples, which is essential to ensure the quality of the experiments. Obtaining satisfactory thermal fields (in compliance with the setpoint and the homogeneity) is all the more difficult as the level of nuclear heating is higher in the JHR. This paper attempts to characterize the irradiation conditions in different experimental positions of the JHR and to compare them with the conditions and the empirical criteria of maximum acceptable temperature measured in OSIRIS. The study shows that the irradiation conditions obtained inside the experimental devices can sometimes be significantly different from the measured conditions using instrumentation devices. The interpretation of the experimental results and their transposition to other situations will always require a calculation versus measurement adjustment and the intensive use of computer simulation. However, despite all simulation and transposition efforts, the control of temperature conditions is not yet fully demonstrated and nothing will ultimately replace experimental validation.
format article
author Blanchet David
Antony Muriel
Carcreff Hubert
François Sébastien
Guimbal Philippe
Pouchin Bernard
author_facet Blanchet David
Antony Muriel
Carcreff Hubert
François Sébastien
Guimbal Philippe
Pouchin Bernard
author_sort Blanchet David
title Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device
title_short Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device
title_full Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device
title_fullStr Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Irradiation Performance in the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) using the CARMEN Measuring Device
title_sort assessment of irradiation performance in the jules horowitz reactor (jhr) using the carmen measuring device
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5c4e325e98ac40c28b7fc59f3f188edc
work_keys_str_mv AT blanchetdavid assessmentofirradiationperformanceinthejuleshorowitzreactorjhrusingthecarmenmeasuringdevice
AT antonymuriel assessmentofirradiationperformanceinthejuleshorowitzreactorjhrusingthecarmenmeasuringdevice
AT carcreffhubert assessmentofirradiationperformanceinthejuleshorowitzreactorjhrusingthecarmenmeasuringdevice
AT francoissebastien assessmentofirradiationperformanceinthejuleshorowitzreactorjhrusingthecarmenmeasuringdevice
AT guimbalphilippe assessmentofirradiationperformanceinthejuleshorowitzreactorjhrusingthecarmenmeasuringdevice
AT pouchinbernard assessmentofirradiationperformanceinthejuleshorowitzreactorjhrusingthecarmenmeasuringdevice
_version_ 1718381380040130560