Combining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment

The results of ecological condition assessments of ecosystems are related to key decisions taken for the purpose of remedial measures or maintaining their current state. In the assessment process, experts come across extensive datasets, the quality, and completeness of which do not always allow for...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grzegorz Chrobak, Tomasz Kowalczyk, Thomas B. Fischer, Katarzyna Chrobak, Szymon Szewrański, Jan K. Kazak
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5c4f1588eb54443994b48fc004934d93
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5c4f1588eb54443994b48fc004934d93
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5c4f1588eb54443994b48fc004934d932021-12-01T05:02:34ZCombining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108318https://doaj.org/article/5c4f1588eb54443994b48fc004934d932021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21009833https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XThe results of ecological condition assessments of ecosystems are related to key decisions taken for the purpose of remedial measures or maintaining their current state. In the assessment process, experts come across extensive datasets, the quality, and completeness of which do not always allow for a reliable evaluation, especially if a single empirical approach is used. In this paper, results of machine learning algorithms are presented, with a focus on Self-Organizing Maps. In this context, measurements of component parameters for the assessment of the ecological state of lake ecosystems were subjected to the process of unsupervised machine learning with the aim to create an alternative assessment approach based on the capabilities of neural networks. Results are mapped and compared with expert evaluations, allowing to extend knowledge about sub-clusters present in the data. The primary target of this paper is the ecological assessment expert. At an early stage, information was obtained about the presence of ecological outliers that may be subject to separate monitoring or verification of environmental activities and objectives. In the back-mapping process, the presented technique of map construction and clustering with various versions of the division was referenced to a set of expert classification findings, revealing the underlying structure of the results when addressed with an unsupervised data comprehension. The approach introduced here does not intend to interfere with the format of an original assessment methodology. Rather it aims at obtaining useful additional information which may help in making better decisions.Grzegorz ChrobakTomasz KowalczykThomas B. FischerKatarzyna ChrobakSzymon SzewrańskiJan K. KazakElsevierarticleEnvironmental managementEcological assessmentWater qualityEcosystemsNeural networksDecision supportEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 132, Iss , Pp 108318- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Environmental management
Ecological assessment
Water quality
Ecosystems
Neural networks
Decision support
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Environmental management
Ecological assessment
Water quality
Ecosystems
Neural networks
Decision support
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Grzegorz Chrobak
Tomasz Kowalczyk
Thomas B. Fischer
Katarzyna Chrobak
Szymon Szewrański
Jan K. Kazak
Combining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment
description The results of ecological condition assessments of ecosystems are related to key decisions taken for the purpose of remedial measures or maintaining their current state. In the assessment process, experts come across extensive datasets, the quality, and completeness of which do not always allow for a reliable evaluation, especially if a single empirical approach is used. In this paper, results of machine learning algorithms are presented, with a focus on Self-Organizing Maps. In this context, measurements of component parameters for the assessment of the ecological state of lake ecosystems were subjected to the process of unsupervised machine learning with the aim to create an alternative assessment approach based on the capabilities of neural networks. Results are mapped and compared with expert evaluations, allowing to extend knowledge about sub-clusters present in the data. The primary target of this paper is the ecological assessment expert. At an early stage, information was obtained about the presence of ecological outliers that may be subject to separate monitoring or verification of environmental activities and objectives. In the back-mapping process, the presented technique of map construction and clustering with various versions of the division was referenced to a set of expert classification findings, revealing the underlying structure of the results when addressed with an unsupervised data comprehension. The approach introduced here does not intend to interfere with the format of an original assessment methodology. Rather it aims at obtaining useful additional information which may help in making better decisions.
format article
author Grzegorz Chrobak
Tomasz Kowalczyk
Thomas B. Fischer
Katarzyna Chrobak
Szymon Szewrański
Jan K. Kazak
author_facet Grzegorz Chrobak
Tomasz Kowalczyk
Thomas B. Fischer
Katarzyna Chrobak
Szymon Szewrański
Jan K. Kazak
author_sort Grzegorz Chrobak
title Combining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment
title_short Combining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment
title_full Combining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment
title_fullStr Combining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment
title_full_unstemmed Combining indicators for better decisions – Algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment
title_sort combining indicators for better decisions – algorithms vs experts on lakes ecological status assessment
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5c4f1588eb54443994b48fc004934d93
work_keys_str_mv AT grzegorzchrobak combiningindicatorsforbetterdecisionsalgorithmsvsexpertsonlakesecologicalstatusassessment
AT tomaszkowalczyk combiningindicatorsforbetterdecisionsalgorithmsvsexpertsonlakesecologicalstatusassessment
AT thomasbfischer combiningindicatorsforbetterdecisionsalgorithmsvsexpertsonlakesecologicalstatusassessment
AT katarzynachrobak combiningindicatorsforbetterdecisionsalgorithmsvsexpertsonlakesecologicalstatusassessment
AT szymonszewranski combiningindicatorsforbetterdecisionsalgorithmsvsexpertsonlakesecologicalstatusassessment
AT jankkazak combiningindicatorsforbetterdecisionsalgorithmsvsexpertsonlakesecologicalstatusassessment
_version_ 1718405601470447616