The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance

John A Hovanesian,1 Michael Jones,2 Quentin Allen3 1Harvard Eye Associates, Laguna Hills, CA, USA; 2Quantum Vision Centers, Swansea, IL, USA; 3Florida Vision Institute, Stuart, FL, USACorrespondence: John A HovanesianHarvard Eye Associates, 23961 Calle De La Magdalena, #300, Laguna Hills, CA, 92653,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hovanesian JA, Jones M, Allen Q
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:	cataract surgery spectacle independence glare multifocal intraocular lens Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5cbd3a827124415d80e40816791cf03b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5cbd3a827124415d80e40816791cf03b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5cbd3a827124415d80e40816791cf03b2021-12-02T17:57:32ZThe PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/5cbd3a827124415d80e40816791cf03b2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-panoptix-trifocal-iol-vs-the-restor-25-active-focus-and-restor-30--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483John A Hovanesian,1 Michael Jones,2 Quentin Allen3 1Harvard Eye Associates, Laguna Hills, CA, USA; 2Quantum Vision Centers, Swansea, IL, USA; 3Florida Vision Institute, Stuart, FL, USACorrespondence: John A HovanesianHarvard Eye Associates, 23961 Calle De La Magdalena, #300, Laguna Hills, CA, 92653, USATel +1 949 951 2020Fax +1 949 951 9244Email jhovanesian@harvardeye.comPurpose: To compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL.Patients and Methods: Prospective, open-label, multicenter analysis of PROs, spectacle independence, and satisfaction among patients undergoing cataract surgery who had been implanted at least 1 month previously with AcrySof IQ PanOptix or PanOptix Toric trifocal (n = 59) IOLs bilaterally. Results were compared to outcomes from a similar study with the AcrySof ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 or the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 mini-monovision lens [n = 191]).Results: Spectacle independence was significantly higher in the PanOptix cohort, with 83% of patients “never” needing glasses for any activity versus 36% in the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision and 34% in the ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 cohorts. No significant differences in patient satisfaction rates were reported between the three cohorts. Glare and halo were rated “extremely” noticeable more with the PanOptix (10%) than with the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision (1%) or ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 (3%). BCVA differences were not statistically significant, and no new safety concerns were reported.Conclusion: The AcrySof PanOptix trifocal provides significantly greater spectacle independence across all measured activities than the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal IOLs.Keywords: cataract surgery, spectacle independence, glare, multifocal intraocular lensHovanesian JAJones MAllen QDove Medical Pressarticlecataract surgeryspectacle independenceglaremultifocal intraocular lensOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 15, Pp 983-990 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	cataract surgery spectacle independence glare multifocal intraocular lens Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	cataract surgery spectacle independence glare multifocal intraocular lens Ophthalmology RE1-994 Hovanesian JA Jones M Allen Q The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
description	John A Hovanesian,1 Michael Jones,2 Quentin Allen3 1Harvard Eye Associates, Laguna Hills, CA, USA; 2Quantum Vision Centers, Swansea, IL, USA; 3Florida Vision Institute, Stuart, FL, USACorrespondence: John A HovanesianHarvard Eye Associates, 23961 Calle De La Magdalena, #300, Laguna Hills, CA, 92653, USATel +1 949 951 2020Fax +1 949 951 9244Email jhovanesian@harvardeye.comPurpose: To compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL.Patients and Methods: Prospective, open-label, multicenter analysis of PROs, spectacle independence, and satisfaction among patients undergoing cataract surgery who had been implanted at least 1 month previously with AcrySof IQ PanOptix or PanOptix Toric trifocal (n = 59) IOLs bilaterally. Results were compared to outcomes from a similar study with the AcrySof ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 or the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 mini-monovision lens [n = 191]).Results: Spectacle independence was significantly higher in the PanOptix cohort, with 83% of patients “never” needing glasses for any activity versus 36% in the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision and 34% in the ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 cohorts. No significant differences in patient satisfaction rates were reported between the three cohorts. Glare and halo were rated “extremely” noticeable more with the PanOptix (10%) than with the ReSTOR 2.5 mini-monovision (1%) or ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 (3%). BCVA differences were not statistically significant, and no new safety concerns were reported.Conclusion: The AcrySof PanOptix trifocal provides significantly greater spectacle independence across all measured activities than the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal IOLs.Keywords: cataract surgery, spectacle independence, glare, multifocal intraocular lens
format	article
author	Hovanesian JA Jones M Allen Q
author_facet	Hovanesian JA Jones M Allen Q
author_sort	Hovanesian JA
title	The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_short	The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_full	The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_fullStr	The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_full_unstemmed	The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
title_sort	panoptix trifocal iol vs the restor 2.5 active focus and restor 3.0-add multifocal lenses: a study of patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and uncorrected visual performance
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/5cbd3a827124415d80e40816791cf03b
work_keys_str_mv	AT hovanesianja thepanoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance AT jonesm thepanoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance AT allenq thepanoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance AT hovanesianja panoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance AT jonesm panoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance AT allenq panoptixtrifocaliolvstherestor25activefocusandrestor30addmultifocallensesastudyofpatientsatisfactionvisualdisturbancesanduncorrectedvisualperformance
_version_	1718379046625083392

The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance

Ejemplares similares