Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis

For both the atria and ventricles, fibrosis is generally recognized as one of the key determinants of conduction disturbances. By definition, fibrosis refers to an increased amount of fibrous tissue. However, fibrosis is not a singular entity. Various forms can be distinguished, that differ in distr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sander Verheule, Ulrich Schotten
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5cf7b3733fc34b5daa801b81eb39769f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5cf7b3733fc34b5daa801b81eb39769f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5cf7b3733fc34b5daa801b81eb39769f2021-11-25T17:13:00ZElectrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis10.3390/cells101132202073-4409https://doaj.org/article/5cf7b3733fc34b5daa801b81eb39769f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/10/11/3220https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4409For both the atria and ventricles, fibrosis is generally recognized as one of the key determinants of conduction disturbances. By definition, fibrosis refers to an increased amount of fibrous tissue. However, fibrosis is not a singular entity. Various forms can be distinguished, that differ in distribution: replacement fibrosis, endomysial and perimysial fibrosis, and perivascular, endocardial, and epicardial fibrosis. These different forms typically result from diverging pathophysiological mechanisms and can have different consequences for conduction. The impact of fibrosis on propagation depends on exactly how the patterns of electrical connections between myocytes are altered. We will therefore first consider the normal patterns of electrical connections and their regional diversity as determinants of propagation. Subsequently, we will summarize current knowledge on how different forms of fibrosis lead to a loss of electrical connectivity in order to explain their effects on propagation and mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis, including ectopy, reentry, and alternans. Finally, we will discuss a histological quantification of fibrosis. Because of the different forms of fibrosis and their diverging effects on electrical propagation, the total amount of fibrosis is a poor indicator for the effect on conduction. Ideally, an assessment of cardiac fibrosis should exclude fibrous tissue that does not affect conduction and differentiate between the various types that do; in this article, we highlight practical solutions for histological analysis that meet these requirements.Sander VerheuleUlrich SchottenMDPI AGarticlefibrosisconductionarrhythmiastissue structureheartBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENCells, Vol 10, Iss 3220, p 3220 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic fibrosis
conduction
arrhythmias
tissue structure
heart
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle fibrosis
conduction
arrhythmias
tissue structure
heart
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Sander Verheule
Ulrich Schotten
Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis
description For both the atria and ventricles, fibrosis is generally recognized as one of the key determinants of conduction disturbances. By definition, fibrosis refers to an increased amount of fibrous tissue. However, fibrosis is not a singular entity. Various forms can be distinguished, that differ in distribution: replacement fibrosis, endomysial and perimysial fibrosis, and perivascular, endocardial, and epicardial fibrosis. These different forms typically result from diverging pathophysiological mechanisms and can have different consequences for conduction. The impact of fibrosis on propagation depends on exactly how the patterns of electrical connections between myocytes are altered. We will therefore first consider the normal patterns of electrical connections and their regional diversity as determinants of propagation. Subsequently, we will summarize current knowledge on how different forms of fibrosis lead to a loss of electrical connectivity in order to explain their effects on propagation and mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis, including ectopy, reentry, and alternans. Finally, we will discuss a histological quantification of fibrosis. Because of the different forms of fibrosis and their diverging effects on electrical propagation, the total amount of fibrosis is a poor indicator for the effect on conduction. Ideally, an assessment of cardiac fibrosis should exclude fibrous tissue that does not affect conduction and differentiate between the various types that do; in this article, we highlight practical solutions for histological analysis that meet these requirements.
format article
author Sander Verheule
Ulrich Schotten
author_facet Sander Verheule
Ulrich Schotten
author_sort Sander Verheule
title Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis
title_short Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis
title_full Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis
title_fullStr Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological Consequences of Cardiac Fibrosis
title_sort electrophysiological consequences of cardiac fibrosis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5cf7b3733fc34b5daa801b81eb39769f
work_keys_str_mv AT sanderverheule electrophysiologicalconsequencesofcardiacfibrosis
AT ulrichschotten electrophysiologicalconsequencesofcardiacfibrosis
_version_ 1718412589515407360