Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.

The human brain tracks amplitude fluctuations of both speech and music, which reflects acoustic processing in addition to the encoding of higher-order features and one's cognitive state. Comparing neural tracking of speech and music envelopes can elucidate stimulus-general mechanisms, but direc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nathaniel J Zuk, Jeremy W Murphy, Richard B Reilly, Edmund C Lalor
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5d03b1592d494788875b452e8c1514c1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5d03b1592d494788875b452e8c1514c1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5d03b1592d494788875b452e8c1514c12021-12-02T19:57:46ZEnvelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1009358https://doaj.org/article/5d03b1592d494788875b452e8c1514c12021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009358https://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358The human brain tracks amplitude fluctuations of both speech and music, which reflects acoustic processing in addition to the encoding of higher-order features and one's cognitive state. Comparing neural tracking of speech and music envelopes can elucidate stimulus-general mechanisms, but direct comparisons are confounded by differences in their envelope spectra. Here, we use a novel method of frequency-constrained reconstruction of stimulus envelopes using EEG recorded during passive listening. We expected to see music reconstruction match speech in a narrow range of frequencies, but instead we found that speech was reconstructed better than music for all frequencies we examined. Additionally, models trained on all stimulus types performed as well or better than the stimulus-specific models at higher modulation frequencies, suggesting a common neural mechanism for tracking speech and music. However, speech envelope tracking at low frequencies, below 1 Hz, was associated with increased weighting over parietal channels, which was not present for the other stimuli. Our results highlight the importance of low-frequency speech tracking and suggest an origin from speech-specific processing in the brain.Nathaniel J ZukJeremy W MurphyRichard B ReillyEdmund C LalorPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 17, Iss 9, p e1009358 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Nathaniel J Zuk
Jeremy W Murphy
Richard B Reilly
Edmund C Lalor
Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.
description The human brain tracks amplitude fluctuations of both speech and music, which reflects acoustic processing in addition to the encoding of higher-order features and one's cognitive state. Comparing neural tracking of speech and music envelopes can elucidate stimulus-general mechanisms, but direct comparisons are confounded by differences in their envelope spectra. Here, we use a novel method of frequency-constrained reconstruction of stimulus envelopes using EEG recorded during passive listening. We expected to see music reconstruction match speech in a narrow range of frequencies, but instead we found that speech was reconstructed better than music for all frequencies we examined. Additionally, models trained on all stimulus types performed as well or better than the stimulus-specific models at higher modulation frequencies, suggesting a common neural mechanism for tracking speech and music. However, speech envelope tracking at low frequencies, below 1 Hz, was associated with increased weighting over parietal channels, which was not present for the other stimuli. Our results highlight the importance of low-frequency speech tracking and suggest an origin from speech-specific processing in the brain.
format article
author Nathaniel J Zuk
Jeremy W Murphy
Richard B Reilly
Edmund C Lalor
author_facet Nathaniel J Zuk
Jeremy W Murphy
Richard B Reilly
Edmund C Lalor
author_sort Nathaniel J Zuk
title Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.
title_short Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.
title_full Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.
title_fullStr Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.
title_full_unstemmed Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.
title_sort envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5d03b1592d494788875b452e8c1514c1
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanieljzuk envelopereconstructionofspeechandmusichighlightsstrongertrackingofspeechatlowfrequencies
AT jeremywmurphy envelopereconstructionofspeechandmusichighlightsstrongertrackingofspeechatlowfrequencies
AT richardbreilly envelopereconstructionofspeechandmusichighlightsstrongertrackingofspeechatlowfrequencies
AT edmundclalor envelopereconstructionofspeechandmusichighlightsstrongertrackingofspeechatlowfrequencies
_version_ 1718375779216130048