The Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered
<p class="Geenafstand1" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; font-family: ";Garamond";,";serif";;" lang="EN-GB">The freedom of speech is crucial to an open society, as pointed out by Mill....
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Amsterdam Law Forum
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5d718ab457bc4fb893800a256c497547 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5d718ab457bc4fb893800a256c497547 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5d718ab457bc4fb893800a256c4975472021-12-02T07:07:20ZThe Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/5d718ab457bc4fb893800a256c4975472009-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/104https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156<p class="Geenafstand1" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; font-family: ";Garamond";,";serif";;" lang="EN-GB">The freedom of speech is crucial to an open society, as pointed out by Mill. The ECHR differentiates between the freedom of thought and expression, which corresponds to an inner and an outer element. Liberty is necessary to find truth; the freedom of speech supposes a possibility to state things that are true and untrue. Liberty also logically implies certain limitations, like the concept of clear and present danger. Moreover, the discourse of the freedom of thought and expression is changing radically in the European countries.</span></p>Daniël OvergaauwAmsterdam Law ForumarticleFreedom of ExpressionLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 25-32 (2009) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Freedom of Expression Law K |
| spellingShingle |
Freedom of Expression Law K Daniël Overgaauw The Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered |
| description |
<p class="Geenafstand1" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 13.0pt; font-family: ";Garamond";,";serif";;" lang="EN-GB">The freedom of speech is crucial to an open society, as pointed out by Mill. The ECHR differentiates between the freedom of thought and expression, which corresponds to an inner and an outer element. Liberty is necessary to find truth; the freedom of speech supposes a possibility to state things that are true and untrue. Liberty also logically implies certain limitations, like the concept of clear and present danger. Moreover, the discourse of the freedom of thought and expression is changing radically in the European countries.</span></p> |
| format |
article |
| author |
Daniël Overgaauw |
| author_facet |
Daniël Overgaauw |
| author_sort |
Daniël Overgaauw |
| title |
The Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered |
| title_short |
The Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered |
| title_full |
The Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered |
| title_fullStr |
The Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Paradoxes of Liberty: the Freedom of Speech (Re-)Considered |
| title_sort |
paradoxes of liberty: the freedom of speech (re-)considered |
| publisher |
Amsterdam Law Forum |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/5d718ab457bc4fb893800a256c497547 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT danialovergaauw theparadoxesoflibertythefreedomofspeechreconsidered AT danialovergaauw paradoxesoflibertythefreedomofspeechreconsidered |
| _version_ |
1718399572083998720 |