Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees

Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jessica Greenfield, Elias I. Traboulsi, Krista Lombardo-Klefos, S. Beth Bierer
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Association of American Medical Colleges 2020
Materias:	Evaluation Accreditation Program Evaluation Faculty Development ACGME Residency Medicine (General) R5-920 Education L
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded2021-11-19T15:15:50ZBest Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees10.15766/mep_2374-8265.110392374-8265https://doaj.org/article/5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11039https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continuous quality improvement projects. Though PECs provide essential documentation to position programs for successful accreditation decisions, few resources exist in the literature for PEC members. Methods Employing Kern's model for curriculum development, we conducted a needs assessment in 2016 that resulted in adding a 2-hour workshop on building and supporting effective PECs to a certificate program for residency program directors. The workshop used a flipped classroom model with prework readings and guiding questions to familiarize participants with ACGME requirements for PECs and APEs. Several activities helped participants identify best practices for PECs and discuss authentic examples of mission statements, APEs, and action plans. Results From 2017 to 2019, we offered this workshop on three different occasions to a total of 42 participants (34 residency program directors/associate program directors and eight program coordinators). In 2019, 14 participants completed a web-based evaluation after the session. All agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop met the learning objectives, utilized interactive teaching methods, included useful APE examples, and provided valuable resources. Discussion This workshop addresses a gap in the literature by helping program directors identify best practices for PECs. The APE template and workshop examples can be adjusted to fit the needs of individual institutions.Jessica GreenfieldElias I. TraboulsiKrista Lombardo-KlefosS. Beth BiererAssociation of American Medical CollegesarticleEvaluationAccreditationProgram EvaluationFaculty DevelopmentACGMEResidencyMedicine (General)R5-920EducationLENMedEdPORTAL, Vol 16 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Evaluation Accreditation Program Evaluation Faculty Development ACGME Residency Medicine (General) R5-920 Education L
spellingShingle	Evaluation Accreditation Program Evaluation Faculty Development ACGME Residency Medicine (General) R5-920 Education L Jessica Greenfield Elias I. Traboulsi Krista Lombardo-Klefos S. Beth Bierer Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees
description	Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continuous quality improvement projects. Though PECs provide essential documentation to position programs for successful accreditation decisions, few resources exist in the literature for PEC members. Methods Employing Kern's model for curriculum development, we conducted a needs assessment in 2016 that resulted in adding a 2-hour workshop on building and supporting effective PECs to a certificate program for residency program directors. The workshop used a flipped classroom model with prework readings and guiding questions to familiarize participants with ACGME requirements for PECs and APEs. Several activities helped participants identify best practices for PECs and discuss authentic examples of mission statements, APEs, and action plans. Results From 2017 to 2019, we offered this workshop on three different occasions to a total of 42 participants (34 residency program directors/associate program directors and eight program coordinators). In 2019, 14 participants completed a web-based evaluation after the session. All agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop met the learning objectives, utilized interactive teaching methods, included useful APE examples, and provided valuable resources. Discussion This workshop addresses a gap in the literature by helping program directors identify best practices for PECs. The APE template and workshop examples can be adjusted to fit the needs of individual institutions.
format	article
author	Jessica Greenfield Elias I. Traboulsi Krista Lombardo-Klefos S. Beth Bierer
author_facet	Jessica Greenfield Elias I. Traboulsi Krista Lombardo-Klefos S. Beth Bierer
author_sort	Jessica Greenfield
title	Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees
title_short	Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees
title_full	Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees
title_fullStr	Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees
title_full_unstemmed	Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees
title_sort	best practices for building and supporting effective acgme-mandated program evaluation committees
publisher	Association of American Medical Colleges
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded
work_keys_str_mv	AT jessicagreenfield bestpracticesforbuildingandsupportingeffectiveacgmemandatedprogramevaluationcommittees AT eliasitraboulsi bestpracticesforbuildingandsupportingeffectiveacgmemandatedprogramevaluationcommittees AT kristalombardoklefos bestpracticesforbuildingandsupportingeffectiveacgmemandatedprogramevaluationcommittees AT sbethbierer bestpracticesforbuildingandsupportingeffectiveacgmemandatedprogramevaluationcommittees
_version_	1718420014225162240

Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees

Ejemplares similares