Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes

Abstract We applied two state-of-the-art, knowledge independent data-mining methods – Dynamic Quantum Clustering (DQC) and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) – to data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We showed that the RNA expression patterns for a mixture of 2,016 samples from...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimberly E. Roche, Marvin Weinstein, Leland J. Dunwoodie, William L. Poehlman, Frank A. Feltus
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5df7caa6fa724781984fe8b965d77763
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5df7caa6fa724781984fe8b965d77763
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5df7caa6fa724781984fe8b965d777632021-12-02T11:40:25ZSorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes10.1038/s41598-018-26310-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5df7caa6fa724781984fe8b965d777632018-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26310-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We applied two state-of-the-art, knowledge independent data-mining methods – Dynamic Quantum Clustering (DQC) and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) – to data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We showed that the RNA expression patterns for a mixture of 2,016 samples from five tumor types can sort the tumors into groups enriched for relevant annotations including tumor type, gender, tumor stage, and ethnicity. DQC feature selection analysis discovered 48 core biomarker transcripts that clustered tumors by tumor type. When these transcripts were removed, the geometry of tumor relationships changed, but it was still possible to classify the tumors using the RNA expression profiles of the remaining transcripts. We continued to remove the top biomarkers for several iterations and performed cluster analysis. Even though the most informative transcripts were removed from the cluster analysis, the sorting ability of remaining transcripts remained strong after each iteration. Further, in some iterations we detected a repeating pattern of biological function that wasn’t detectable with the core biomarker transcripts present. This suggests the existence of a “background classification” potential in which the pattern of gene expression after continued removal of “biomarker” transcripts could still classify tumors in agreement with the tumor type.Kimberly E. RocheMarvin WeinsteinLeland J. DunwoodieWilliam L. PoehlmanFrank A. FeltusNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kimberly E. Roche
Marvin Weinstein
Leland J. Dunwoodie
William L. Poehlman
Frank A. Feltus
Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes
description Abstract We applied two state-of-the-art, knowledge independent data-mining methods – Dynamic Quantum Clustering (DQC) and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) – to data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We showed that the RNA expression patterns for a mixture of 2,016 samples from five tumor types can sort the tumors into groups enriched for relevant annotations including tumor type, gender, tumor stage, and ethnicity. DQC feature selection analysis discovered 48 core biomarker transcripts that clustered tumors by tumor type. When these transcripts were removed, the geometry of tumor relationships changed, but it was still possible to classify the tumors using the RNA expression profiles of the remaining transcripts. We continued to remove the top biomarkers for several iterations and performed cluster analysis. Even though the most informative transcripts were removed from the cluster analysis, the sorting ability of remaining transcripts remained strong after each iteration. Further, in some iterations we detected a repeating pattern of biological function that wasn’t detectable with the core biomarker transcripts present. This suggests the existence of a “background classification” potential in which the pattern of gene expression after continued removal of “biomarker” transcripts could still classify tumors in agreement with the tumor type.
format article
author Kimberly E. Roche
Marvin Weinstein
Leland J. Dunwoodie
William L. Poehlman
Frank A. Feltus
author_facet Kimberly E. Roche
Marvin Weinstein
Leland J. Dunwoodie
William L. Poehlman
Frank A. Feltus
author_sort Kimberly E. Roche
title Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes
title_short Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes
title_full Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes
title_fullStr Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes
title_full_unstemmed Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes
title_sort sorting five human tumor types reveals specific biomarkers and background classification genes
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/5df7caa6fa724781984fe8b965d77763
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlyeroche sortingfivehumantumortypesrevealsspecificbiomarkersandbackgroundclassificationgenes
AT marvinweinstein sortingfivehumantumortypesrevealsspecificbiomarkersandbackgroundclassificationgenes
AT lelandjdunwoodie sortingfivehumantumortypesrevealsspecificbiomarkersandbackgroundclassificationgenes
AT williamlpoehlman sortingfivehumantumortypesrevealsspecificbiomarkersandbackgroundclassificationgenes
AT frankafeltus sortingfivehumantumortypesrevealsspecificbiomarkersandbackgroundclassificationgenes
_version_ 1718395644394078208