ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER

The second generation intact stability criteria (SGISC) have been developed by the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Subcommittee on Ship Design and Construction (SDC). The SGISC involve improving the current intact stability criteria by including dynamic movements of ships in waves. The c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Muhammet Ali YILMAZER, Burak YILDIZ
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	National Defense University Barbaros Naval Sciences and Engineering Institute Journal of Naval Science and Engineering 2021
Materias:	second generation intact stability criteria pure loss of stability level 1 level 2 navy tanker Naval Science V
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5df90ae044d54d58b72ea966017c5e9a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5df90ae044d54d58b72ea966017c5e9a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5df90ae044d54d58b72ea966017c5e9a2021-11-16T15:59:31ZASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER1304-2025https://doaj.org/article/5df90ae044d54d58b72ea966017c5e9a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1775362https://doaj.org/toc/1304-2025The second generation intact stability criteria (SGISC) have been developed by the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Subcommittee on Ship Design and Construction (SDC). The SGISC involve improving the current intact stability criteria by including dynamic movements of ships in waves. The criteria are structured around five failure modes, pure loss of stability being one of these. This paper presents sample calculations regarding the assessment of pure loss of stability for a Turkish navy tanker. The calculations involve two steps that this study explains: Level 1 and Level 2. In addition, Option A and Option B are used as solution methods for both levels. Minimum metacentric heights (GMmin) are calculated at the lowest draft (Option A) and at different wave crest locations alongside the ship (Option B) for Level 1. Values for the angle of vanishing stability, angle of loll, angle of stable equilibrium and maximum righting lever have been calculated from the GZ curves for Level 2. As a result, the subject ship was found not to be vulnerable to pure loss of stability. Level 1 results for both options are inconsistent due to Level 2 results being consistent.Muhammet Ali YILMAZERBurak YILDIZNational Defense University Barbaros Naval Sciences and Engineering Institute Journal of Naval Science and Engineeringarticlesecond generation intact stability criteriapure loss of stabilitylevel 1level 2navy tankerNaval ScienceVENJournal of Naval Science and Engineering, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp 309-341 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	second generation intact stability criteria pure loss of stability level 1 level 2 navy tanker Naval Science V
spellingShingle	second generation intact stability criteria pure loss of stability level 1 level 2 navy tanker Naval Science V Muhammet Ali YILMAZER Burak YILDIZ ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER
description	The second generation intact stability criteria (SGISC) have been developed by the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Subcommittee on Ship Design and Construction (SDC). The SGISC involve improving the current intact stability criteria by including dynamic movements of ships in waves. The criteria are structured around five failure modes, pure loss of stability being one of these. This paper presents sample calculations regarding the assessment of pure loss of stability for a Turkish navy tanker. The calculations involve two steps that this study explains: Level 1 and Level 2. In addition, Option A and Option B are used as solution methods for both levels. Minimum metacentric heights (GMmin) are calculated at the lowest draft (Option A) and at different wave crest locations alongside the ship (Option B) for Level 1. Values for the angle of vanishing stability, angle of loll, angle of stable equilibrium and maximum righting lever have been calculated from the GZ curves for Level 2. As a result, the subject ship was found not to be vulnerable to pure loss of stability. Level 1 results for both options are inconsistent due to Level 2 results being consistent.
format	article
author	Muhammet Ali YILMAZER Burak YILDIZ
author_facet	Muhammet Ali YILMAZER Burak YILDIZ
author_sort	Muhammet Ali YILMAZER
title	ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER
title_short	ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER
title_full	ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER
title_fullStr	ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER
title_full_unstemmed	ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER
title_sort	assessment of pure loss of stability for a turkish navy tanker
publisher	National Defense University Barbaros Naval Sciences and Engineering Institute Journal of Naval Science and Engineering
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/5df90ae044d54d58b72ea966017c5e9a
work_keys_str_mv	AT muhammetaliyilmazer assessmentofpurelossofstabilityforaturkishnavytanker AT burakyildiz assessmentofpurelossofstabilityforaturkishnavytanker
_version_	1718426303555698688

ASSESSMENT OF PURE LOSS OF STABILITY FOR A TURKISH NAVY TANKER

Ejemplares similares