Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
Background and study aims En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred over piecemeal resection for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Data on colorectal EMR training are limited. We aimed to evaluate the en bloc EMR rate of polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees and to identify predictors of fail...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b1040 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b1040 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b10402021-11-13T00:00:31ZEndoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees2364-37222196-973610.1055/a-1578-1965https://doaj.org/article/5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b10402021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1578-1965https://doaj.org/toc/2364-3722https://doaj.org/toc/2196-9736Background and study aims En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred over piecemeal resection for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Data on colorectal EMR training are limited. We aimed to evaluate the en bloc EMR rate of polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees and to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Methods This was a multicenter prospective study evaluating trainee performance in EMR during advanced endoscopy fellowship. A logistic regression model was used to identify the number of procedures and lesion cut-off size associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Results Six trainees from six centers performed 189 colorectal EMRs, of which 104 (55 %) were for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Of these, 57.7 % (60/104) were resected en bloc. Trainees with ≥ 30 EMRs (OR 6.80; 95 % CI: 2.80–16.50; P = 0.00001) and lesions ≤ 17 mm (OR 4.56;95 CI:1.23–16.88; P = 0.02) were more likely to be associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Independent predictors of failed en bloc EMR on multivariate analysis included: larger polyp size (OR:6.83;95 % CI:2.55–18.4; P = 0.0001), right colon location (OR:7.15; 95 % CI:1.31–38.9; P = 0.02), increased procedural difficulty (OR 2.99; 95 % CI:1.13–7.91; P = 0.03), and having performed < 30 EMRs (OR: 4.87; 95 %CI: 1.05–22.61; P = 0.04). Conclusions In this pilot study, we demonstrated that a relatively low proportion of trainees achieved en bloc EMR for polyps ≤ 20 mm and identified procedure volume and lesion size thresholds for successful en bloc EMR and independent predictors for failed en bloc resection. These preliminary results support the need for future efforts to define EMR procedure competence thresholds during training.William W. KingPeter V. DraganovAndrew Y. WangDushant UppalAmir RummanNikhil A. KumtaChristopher J. DiMaioArvind J. TrindadeDivyesh V. SejpalLionel S. D’SouzaJuan C. BucoboVictoria GomezMichael B. WallaceHeiko PohlDennis YangGeorg Thieme Verlag KGarticleDiseases of the digestive system. GastroenterologyRC799-869ENEndoscopy International Open, Vol 09, Iss 11, Pp E1820-E1826 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology RC799-869 |
spellingShingle |
Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology RC799-869 William W. King Peter V. Draganov Andrew Y. Wang Dushant Uppal Amir Rumman Nikhil A. Kumta Christopher J. DiMaio Arvind J. Trindade Divyesh V. Sejpal Lionel S. D’Souza Juan C. Bucobo Victoria Gomez Michael B. Wallace Heiko Pohl Dennis Yang Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees |
description |
Background and study aims En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred over piecemeal resection for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Data on colorectal EMR training are limited. We aimed to evaluate the en bloc EMR rate of polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees and to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR.
Methods This was a multicenter prospective study evaluating trainee performance in EMR during advanced endoscopy fellowship. A logistic regression model was used to identify the number of procedures and lesion cut-off size associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR.
Results Six trainees from six centers performed 189 colorectal EMRs, of which 104 (55 %) were for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Of these, 57.7 % (60/104) were resected en bloc. Trainees with ≥ 30 EMRs (OR 6.80; 95 % CI: 2.80–16.50; P = 0.00001) and lesions ≤ 17 mm (OR 4.56;95 CI:1.23–16.88; P = 0.02) were more likely to be associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Independent predictors of failed en bloc EMR on multivariate analysis included: larger polyp size (OR:6.83;95 % CI:2.55–18.4; P = 0.0001), right colon location (OR:7.15; 95 % CI:1.31–38.9; P = 0.02), increased procedural difficulty (OR 2.99; 95 % CI:1.13–7.91; P = 0.03), and having performed < 30 EMRs (OR: 4.87; 95 %CI: 1.05–22.61; P = 0.04).
Conclusions In this pilot study, we demonstrated that a relatively low proportion of trainees achieved en bloc EMR for polyps ≤ 20 mm and identified procedure volume and lesion size thresholds for successful en bloc EMR and independent predictors for failed en bloc resection. These preliminary results support the need for future efforts to define EMR procedure competence thresholds during training. |
format |
article |
author |
William W. King Peter V. Draganov Andrew Y. Wang Dushant Uppal Amir Rumman Nikhil A. Kumta Christopher J. DiMaio Arvind J. Trindade Divyesh V. Sejpal Lionel S. D’Souza Juan C. Bucobo Victoria Gomez Michael B. Wallace Heiko Pohl Dennis Yang |
author_facet |
William W. King Peter V. Draganov Andrew Y. Wang Dushant Uppal Amir Rumman Nikhil A. Kumta Christopher J. DiMaio Arvind J. Trindade Divyesh V. Sejpal Lionel S. D’Souza Juan C. Bucobo Victoria Gomez Michael B. Wallace Heiko Pohl Dennis Yang |
author_sort |
William W. King |
title |
Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees |
title_short |
Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees |
title_full |
Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees |
title_fullStr |
Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees |
title_full_unstemmed |
Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees |
title_sort |
endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees |
publisher |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b1040 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT williamwking endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT petervdraganov endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT andrewywang endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT dushantuppal endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT amirrumman endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT nikhilakumta endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT christopherjdimaio endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT arvindjtrindade endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT divyeshvsejpal endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT lionelsdsouza endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT juancbucobo endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT victoriagomez endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT michaelbwallace endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT heikopohl endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees AT dennisyang endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees |
_version_ |
1718430320113483776 |