Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees

Background and study aims En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred over piecemeal resection for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Data on colorectal EMR training are limited. We aimed to evaluate the en bloc EMR rate of polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees and to identify predictors of fail...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: William W. King, Peter V. Draganov, Andrew Y. Wang, Dushant Uppal, Amir Rumman, Nikhil A. Kumta, Christopher J. DiMaio, Arvind J. Trindade, Divyesh V. Sejpal, Lionel S. D’Souza, Juan C. Bucobo, Victoria Gomez, Michael B. Wallace, Heiko Pohl, Dennis Yang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b1040
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b1040
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b10402021-11-13T00:00:31ZEndoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees2364-37222196-973610.1055/a-1578-1965https://doaj.org/article/5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b10402021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1578-1965https://doaj.org/toc/2364-3722https://doaj.org/toc/2196-9736Background and study aims En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred over piecemeal resection for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Data on colorectal EMR training are limited. We aimed to evaluate the en bloc EMR rate of polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees and to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Methods This was a multicenter prospective study evaluating trainee performance in EMR during advanced endoscopy fellowship. A logistic regression model was used to identify the number of procedures and lesion cut-off size associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Results Six trainees from six centers performed 189 colorectal EMRs, of which 104 (55 %) were for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Of these, 57.7 % (60/104) were resected en bloc. Trainees with ≥ 30 EMRs (OR 6.80; 95 % CI: 2.80–16.50; P = 0.00001) and lesions ≤ 17 mm (OR 4.56;95 CI:1.23–16.88; P = 0.02) were more likely to be associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Independent predictors of failed en bloc EMR on multivariate analysis included: larger polyp size (OR:6.83;95 % CI:2.55–18.4; P = 0.0001), right colon location (OR:7.15; 95 % CI:1.31–38.9; P = 0.02), increased procedural difficulty (OR 2.99; 95 % CI:1.13–7.91; P = 0.03), and having performed < 30 EMRs (OR: 4.87; 95 %CI: 1.05–22.61; P = 0.04). Conclusions In this pilot study, we demonstrated that a relatively low proportion of trainees achieved en bloc EMR for polyps ≤ 20 mm and identified procedure volume and lesion size thresholds for successful en bloc EMR and independent predictors for failed en bloc resection. These preliminary results support the need for future efforts to define EMR procedure competence thresholds during training.William W. KingPeter V. DraganovAndrew Y. WangDushant UppalAmir RummanNikhil A. KumtaChristopher J. DiMaioArvind J. TrindadeDivyesh V. SejpalLionel S. D’SouzaJuan C. BucoboVictoria GomezMichael B. WallaceHeiko PohlDennis YangGeorg Thieme Verlag KGarticleDiseases of the digestive system. GastroenterologyRC799-869ENEndoscopy International Open, Vol 09, Iss 11, Pp E1820-E1826 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
RC799-869
spellingShingle Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
RC799-869
William W. King
Peter V. Draganov
Andrew Y. Wang
Dushant Uppal
Amir Rumman
Nikhil A. Kumta
Christopher J. DiMaio
Arvind J. Trindade
Divyesh V. Sejpal
Lionel S. D’Souza
Juan C. Bucobo
Victoria Gomez
Michael B. Wallace
Heiko Pohl
Dennis Yang
Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
description Background and study aims En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred over piecemeal resection for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Data on colorectal EMR training are limited. We aimed to evaluate the en bloc EMR rate of polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees and to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Methods This was a multicenter prospective study evaluating trainee performance in EMR during advanced endoscopy fellowship. A logistic regression model was used to identify the number of procedures and lesion cut-off size associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Results Six trainees from six centers performed 189 colorectal EMRs, of which 104 (55 %) were for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Of these, 57.7 % (60/104) were resected en bloc. Trainees with ≥ 30 EMRs (OR 6.80; 95 % CI: 2.80–16.50; P = 0.00001) and lesions ≤ 17 mm (OR 4.56;95 CI:1.23–16.88; P = 0.02) were more likely to be associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Independent predictors of failed en bloc EMR on multivariate analysis included: larger polyp size (OR:6.83;95 % CI:2.55–18.4; P = 0.0001), right colon location (OR:7.15; 95 % CI:1.31–38.9; P = 0.02), increased procedural difficulty (OR 2.99; 95 % CI:1.13–7.91; P = 0.03), and having performed < 30 EMRs (OR: 4.87; 95 %CI: 1.05–22.61; P = 0.04). Conclusions In this pilot study, we demonstrated that a relatively low proportion of trainees achieved en bloc EMR for polyps ≤ 20 mm and identified procedure volume and lesion size thresholds for successful en bloc EMR and independent predictors for failed en bloc resection. These preliminary results support the need for future efforts to define EMR procedure competence thresholds during training.
format article
author William W. King
Peter V. Draganov
Andrew Y. Wang
Dushant Uppal
Amir Rumman
Nikhil A. Kumta
Christopher J. DiMaio
Arvind J. Trindade
Divyesh V. Sejpal
Lionel S. D’Souza
Juan C. Bucobo
Victoria Gomez
Michael B. Wallace
Heiko Pohl
Dennis Yang
author_facet William W. King
Peter V. Draganov
Andrew Y. Wang
Dushant Uppal
Amir Rumman
Nikhil A. Kumta
Christopher J. DiMaio
Arvind J. Trindade
Divyesh V. Sejpal
Lionel S. D’Souza
Juan C. Bucobo
Victoria Gomez
Michael B. Wallace
Heiko Pohl
Dennis Yang
author_sort William W. King
title Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
title_short Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
title_full Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
title_fullStr Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
title_sort endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5e04f54791e4415eb51edfafe67b1040
work_keys_str_mv AT williamwking endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT petervdraganov endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT andrewywang endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT dushantuppal endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT amirrumman endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT nikhilakumta endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT christopherjdimaio endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT arvindjtrindade endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT divyeshvsejpal endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT lionelsdsouza endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT juancbucobo endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT victoriagomez endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT michaelbwallace endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT heikopohl endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
AT dennisyang endoscopicresectionoutcomesandpredictorsoffailedenblocendoscopicmucosalresectionofcolorectalpolyps20mmamongadvancedendoscopytrainees
_version_ 1718430320113483776