How Real Is Hunger?

The present paper looks at a fictional account of the Bengal famine of 1943 in order to locate relevant historical information regarding a specific period of time (Chatterjee 2014) and identify elements that would allow it to be read as an example of the ‘prose of the world’ in Ranajit Guha’s under...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Justyna Kurowska
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5e07a21579d9494ca8a97c35089fb20a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5e07a21579d9494ca8a97c35089fb20a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5e07a21579d9494ca8a97c35089fb20a2021-11-27T12:53:06ZHow Real Is Hunger?10.12797/CIS.23.2021.01.031732-09172449-8696https://doaj.org/article/5e07a21579d9494ca8a97c35089fb20a2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/cis/article/view/3845https://doaj.org/toc/1732-0917https://doaj.org/toc/2449-8696 The present paper looks at a fictional account of the Bengal famine of 1943 in order to locate relevant historical information regarding a specific period of time (Chatterjee 2014) and identify elements that would allow it to be read as an example of the ‘prose of the world’ in Ranajit Guha’s understanding of the term (Guha 2002). The narrative of Amr̥tlāl Nāgar’s Bhūkh is framed through author’s recourse to his own experience, artistic and historical research, lived emotions and personal feeling of urgency to record the event. By repeatedly raising the claim of authenticity of his testimonial, Nāgar unwittingly draws us into an investigation of his relationship with the main narrator and the protagonist of his work. This, in turn, reveals the absence of clarity on the part of the author—he seems in two minds when discussing the role of the elites in making of the famine and is unable to either criticise or justify their failure to act. Further, the paper investigates social reality presented in the novel; the naturalistic, progressive aesthetics used in the description of the embodied violence of hunger; and the portrayal of the protagonist whose vantage point makes the story significantly detached from the ‘masses’ depicted variously as insects or savages, driven by hunger and hunger only. Principal focaliser’s upper-caste perspective allows him to feel superior to the less fortunate ‘skeletons’ and ultimately justify his survival by saving a seemingly upper cast infant, the action understood by him as equal to saving the entire human race. However, to my mind, the reality of hunger presented by the protagonist is conventional, self-centred, and lacks in-depth social criticism. Justyna KurowskaKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticlehungerBengal Famine of 1943disaster literaturedisaster narrativeAmr̥tlāl NāgarBhūkhIndo-Iranian languages and literaturePK1-9601Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, OceaniaPL1-8844ENCracow Indological Studies, Vol 23, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic hunger
Bengal Famine of 1943
disaster literature
disaster narrative
Amr̥tlāl Nāgar
Bhūkh
Indo-Iranian languages and literature
PK1-9601
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
spellingShingle hunger
Bengal Famine of 1943
disaster literature
disaster narrative
Amr̥tlāl Nāgar
Bhūkh
Indo-Iranian languages and literature
PK1-9601
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
Justyna Kurowska
How Real Is Hunger?
description The present paper looks at a fictional account of the Bengal famine of 1943 in order to locate relevant historical information regarding a specific period of time (Chatterjee 2014) and identify elements that would allow it to be read as an example of the ‘prose of the world’ in Ranajit Guha’s understanding of the term (Guha 2002). The narrative of Amr̥tlāl Nāgar’s Bhūkh is framed through author’s recourse to his own experience, artistic and historical research, lived emotions and personal feeling of urgency to record the event. By repeatedly raising the claim of authenticity of his testimonial, Nāgar unwittingly draws us into an investigation of his relationship with the main narrator and the protagonist of his work. This, in turn, reveals the absence of clarity on the part of the author—he seems in two minds when discussing the role of the elites in making of the famine and is unable to either criticise or justify their failure to act. Further, the paper investigates social reality presented in the novel; the naturalistic, progressive aesthetics used in the description of the embodied violence of hunger; and the portrayal of the protagonist whose vantage point makes the story significantly detached from the ‘masses’ depicted variously as insects or savages, driven by hunger and hunger only. Principal focaliser’s upper-caste perspective allows him to feel superior to the less fortunate ‘skeletons’ and ultimately justify his survival by saving a seemingly upper cast infant, the action understood by him as equal to saving the entire human race. However, to my mind, the reality of hunger presented by the protagonist is conventional, self-centred, and lacks in-depth social criticism.
format article
author Justyna Kurowska
author_facet Justyna Kurowska
author_sort Justyna Kurowska
title How Real Is Hunger?
title_short How Real Is Hunger?
title_full How Real Is Hunger?
title_fullStr How Real Is Hunger?
title_full_unstemmed How Real Is Hunger?
title_sort how real is hunger?
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5e07a21579d9494ca8a97c35089fb20a
work_keys_str_mv AT justynakurowska howrealishunger
_version_ 1718408988975955968