Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms

De-Hua Chang,1 Karin Slebocki,2 Ekaterina Khristenko,1 Jan Herden,3 Johannes Salem,3 Nils Große Hokamp,2 Kamal Mammadov,2 Martin Hellmich,4 Christoph Kabbasch21Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Department of D...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang DH, Slebocki K, Khristenko E, Herden J, Salem J, Große Hokamp N, Mammadov K, Hellmich M, Kabbasch C
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5e366f8d11ed4dd78632abb7e3471c0b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5e366f8d11ed4dd78632abb7e3471c0b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5e366f8d11ed4dd78632abb7e3471c0b2021-12-02T03:51:45ZLow-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms1178-7007https://doaj.org/article/5e366f8d11ed4dd78632abb7e3471c0b2019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/low-dose-computed-tomography-of-urolithiasis-in-obese-patients-a-feasi-peer-reviewed-article-DMSOhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-7007De-Hua Chang,1 Karin Slebocki,2 Ekaterina Khristenko,1 Jan Herden,3 Johannes Salem,3 Nils Große Hokamp,2 Kamal Mammadov,2 Martin Hellmich,4 Christoph Kabbasch21Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 3Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 4Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyPurpose: Retrospective evaluation and comparison of image quality generated by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from obese patients with urolithiasis using alternative reconstruction algorithms.Materials and methods: Twenty-five obese patients (body mass index [BMI]>25 kg/m2,) underwent LDCT scans for suspected urolithiasis. The scans were recompiled using filtered-back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (iDose) and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR). Dose-length product (DLP) and patient details were obtained from the CT dose report and clinical charts, respectively. Objective image noise was assessed by measuring the SD of Hounsfield units (HUs) in defined locations. Additionally, subjective image evaluation was independently performed by two radiologists using a 3-point Likert scale. The inter-reviewer agreement of image quality was calculated.Results: Ureteral concretions were observed in all CT scans, two of which revealed bilateral stones. The assessed patients’ mean BMI was 29.29±3.74 kg/m,2 and the DLP of the CT scans was 100.04±10.00 mGy*cm. All scans were rated diagnostic with the iDose and iterative model-based reconstructions, whereas 41% of the scans performed with FBP reconstruction were nondiagnostic. With respect to image quality, IMR was superior to iDose and FBP, both in the objective (P<0.001) and overall subjective (P≤0.008) evaluation of the respective data sets. The inter-reviewer agreement for overall image quality was “almost perfect” for IMR, “substantial” for iDose and “moderate” for FBP (κ values of 1.0, 0.6 and 0.46, respectively).Conclusion: Using iterative image reconstruction algorithms, LDCT of urolithiasis is feasible in overweight patients with a BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m2,. Due to higher image quality, IMR is the preferred algorithm for scan reconstruction as it may help to avoid repeated examinations due to initial nondiagnostic scans.Keywords: low-dose computed tomography, model-based iterative reconstruction, statistical iterative, urolithiasis, obesityChang DHSlebocki KKhristenko EHerden JSalem JGroße Hokamp NMammadov KHellmich MKabbasch CDove Medical PressarticleLow-dose computed tomographyModel-based iterative reconstructionStatistical iterativeUrolithiasisObesitySpecialties of internal medicineRC581-951ENDiabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, Vol Volume 12, Pp 439-445 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Low-dose computed tomography
Model-based iterative reconstruction
Statistical iterative
Urolithiasis
Obesity
Specialties of internal medicine
RC581-951
spellingShingle Low-dose computed tomography
Model-based iterative reconstruction
Statistical iterative
Urolithiasis
Obesity
Specialties of internal medicine
RC581-951
Chang DH
Slebocki K
Khristenko E
Herden J
Salem J
Große Hokamp N
Mammadov K
Hellmich M
Kabbasch C
Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
description De-Hua Chang,1 Karin Slebocki,2 Ekaterina Khristenko,1 Jan Herden,3 Johannes Salem,3 Nils Große Hokamp,2 Kamal Mammadov,2 Martin Hellmich,4 Christoph Kabbasch21Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 3Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; 4Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyPurpose: Retrospective evaluation and comparison of image quality generated by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from obese patients with urolithiasis using alternative reconstruction algorithms.Materials and methods: Twenty-five obese patients (body mass index [BMI]>25 kg/m2,) underwent LDCT scans for suspected urolithiasis. The scans were recompiled using filtered-back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (iDose) and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR). Dose-length product (DLP) and patient details were obtained from the CT dose report and clinical charts, respectively. Objective image noise was assessed by measuring the SD of Hounsfield units (HUs) in defined locations. Additionally, subjective image evaluation was independently performed by two radiologists using a 3-point Likert scale. The inter-reviewer agreement of image quality was calculated.Results: Ureteral concretions were observed in all CT scans, two of which revealed bilateral stones. The assessed patients’ mean BMI was 29.29±3.74 kg/m,2 and the DLP of the CT scans was 100.04±10.00 mGy*cm. All scans were rated diagnostic with the iDose and iterative model-based reconstructions, whereas 41% of the scans performed with FBP reconstruction were nondiagnostic. With respect to image quality, IMR was superior to iDose and FBP, both in the objective (P<0.001) and overall subjective (P≤0.008) evaluation of the respective data sets. The inter-reviewer agreement for overall image quality was “almost perfect” for IMR, “substantial” for iDose and “moderate” for FBP (κ values of 1.0, 0.6 and 0.46, respectively).Conclusion: Using iterative image reconstruction algorithms, LDCT of urolithiasis is feasible in overweight patients with a BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m2,. Due to higher image quality, IMR is the preferred algorithm for scan reconstruction as it may help to avoid repeated examinations due to initial nondiagnostic scans.Keywords: low-dose computed tomography, model-based iterative reconstruction, statistical iterative, urolithiasis, obesity
format article
author Chang DH
Slebocki K
Khristenko E
Herden J
Salem J
Große Hokamp N
Mammadov K
Hellmich M
Kabbasch C
author_facet Chang DH
Slebocki K
Khristenko E
Herden J
Salem J
Große Hokamp N
Mammadov K
Hellmich M
Kabbasch C
author_sort Chang DH
title Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_short Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_full Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_fullStr Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
title_sort low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/5e366f8d11ed4dd78632abb7e3471c0b
work_keys_str_mv AT changdh lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT slebockik lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT khristenkoe lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT herdenj lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT salemj lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT großehokampn lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT mammadovk lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT hellmichm lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
AT kabbaschc lowdosecomputedtomographyofurolithiasisinobesepatientsafeasibilitystudytoevaluateimagereconstructionalgorithms
_version_ 1718401602292809728