Transcendental idealism and structuralism

Transcendental idealism and structuralism

Mostrar otras versiones (1)

The author examines possible analogies between Kant’s transcendental idealism and de Saussure’s and Levi-Strauss’s structuralism, in order to analyse if the former can be understood as a predecessor for the later. The author shows that both teachings assume a priori formal framework, but they diverg...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ivan Vuković
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Anthropology
GN1-890
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5e6d075f92be4c0389b708ae30bc424f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5e6d075f92be4c0389b708ae30bc424f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5e6d075f92be4c0389b708ae30bc424f2021-12-02T07:22:55ZTranscendental idealism and structuralism0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/5e6d075f92be4c0389b708ae30bc424f2016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/296https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801The author examines possible analogies between Kant’s transcendental idealism and de Saussure’s and Levi-Strauss’s structuralism, in order to analyse if the former can be understood as a predecessor for the later. The author shows that both teachings assume a priori formal framework, but they diverge in the ways they describe it, as well as in understanding of its function. Consequently, the author concludes that structuralism can be seen as one possible use of Kant’s idea about the existence of such a frame. Furthermore, the author claims that Ricker’s understanding of structuralism as ‘Kantianism without transcendental subject’ should be rejected, since a teaching which does not assume existence of such subject cannot be understood as Kantian.Ivan VukovićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 75-82 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle Anthropology
GN1-890
Ivan Vuković
Transcendental idealism and structuralism
description The author examines possible analogies between Kant’s transcendental idealism and de Saussure’s and Levi-Strauss’s structuralism, in order to analyse if the former can be understood as a predecessor for the later. The author shows that both teachings assume a priori formal framework, but they diverge in the ways they describe it, as well as in understanding of its function. Consequently, the author concludes that structuralism can be seen as one possible use of Kant’s idea about the existence of such a frame. Furthermore, the author claims that Ricker’s understanding of structuralism as ‘Kantianism without transcendental subject’ should be rejected, since a teaching which does not assume existence of such subject cannot be understood as Kantian.
format article
author Ivan Vuković
author_facet Ivan Vuković
author_sort Ivan Vuković
title Transcendental idealism and structuralism
title_short Transcendental idealism and structuralism
title_full Transcendental idealism and structuralism
title_fullStr Transcendental idealism and structuralism
title_full_unstemmed Transcendental idealism and structuralism
title_sort transcendental idealism and structuralism
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/5e6d075f92be4c0389b708ae30bc424f
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanvukovic transcendentalidealismandstructuralism
_version_ 1718399457906655232

Ejemplares similares