The unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology
This article presents additional data in support of the fact that imperatives cannot be embedded in Korean. It demonstrates that the language employs two different types of imperative morphology: one that occurs in main clauses and the other that occurs in embedded environments, and that their occur...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5e6f6fc63bc94dabb209eb1d56be2133 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5e6f6fc63bc94dabb209eb1d56be2133 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5e6f6fc63bc94dabb209eb1d56be21332021-12-05T14:11:00ZThe unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology2300-996910.1515/opli-2021-0005https://doaj.org/article/5e6f6fc63bc94dabb209eb1d56be21332021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2021-0005https://doaj.org/toc/2300-9969This article presents additional data in support of the fact that imperatives cannot be embedded in Korean. It demonstrates that the language employs two different types of imperative morphology: one that occurs in main clauses and the other that occurs in embedded environments, and that their occurrence is mutually exclusive. That being the case, the main imperative morphology is a bona fide illocutionary force marker that is syntactically encoded in the main clauses only, whereas the embedded imperative morphology simply serves as a clause-type indicator with no illocutionary force.Yim ChanggukDe Gruyterarticleimperativeunembeddableclause typespeech act projectionkoreanPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENOpen Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 35-41 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
imperative unembeddable clause type speech act projection korean Philology. Linguistics P1-1091 |
| spellingShingle |
imperative unembeddable clause type speech act projection korean Philology. Linguistics P1-1091 Yim Changguk The unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology |
| description |
This article presents additional data in support of the fact that imperatives cannot be embedded in Korean. It demonstrates that the language employs two different types of imperative morphology: one that occurs in main clauses and the other that occurs in embedded environments, and that their occurrence is mutually exclusive. That being the case, the main imperative morphology is a bona fide illocutionary force marker that is syntactically encoded in the main clauses only, whereas the embedded imperative morphology simply serves as a clause-type indicator with no illocutionary force. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Yim Changguk |
| author_facet |
Yim Changguk |
| author_sort |
Yim Changguk |
| title |
The unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology |
| title_short |
The unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology |
| title_full |
The unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology |
| title_fullStr |
The unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The unembeddability of imperatives in Korean: Two different types of imperative morphology |
| title_sort |
unembeddability of imperatives in korean: two different types of imperative morphology |
| publisher |
De Gruyter |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/5e6f6fc63bc94dabb209eb1d56be2133 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT yimchangguk theunembeddabilityofimperativesinkoreantwodifferenttypesofimperativemorphology AT yimchangguk unembeddabilityofimperativesinkoreantwodifferenttypesofimperativemorphology |
| _version_ |
1718371475666239488 |