Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico
Objective: To evaluate the frequency of perceived ethical misconduct in the practice of neuropsychology in Mexico. Method: One hundred fourteen psychologists answered a survey which assessed perceptions of ethical misconduct in four areas of professional practice in the field of neuropsychology.Res...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN ES |
Publicado: |
Universidad de San Buenaventura
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5e6f828f266d4535a212c9f91c005e60 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:5e6f828f266d4535a212c9f91c005e60 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:5e6f828f266d4535a212c9f91c005e602021-11-25T02:21:53ZPerceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico10.21500/20112084.21012011-20842011-7922https://doaj.org/article/5e6f828f266d4535a212c9f91c005e602016-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2101https://doaj.org/toc/2011-2084https://doaj.org/toc/2011-7922 Objective: To evaluate the frequency of perceived ethical misconduct in the practice of neuropsychology in Mexico. Method: One hundred fourteen psychologists answered a survey which assessed perceptions of ethical misconduct in four areas of professional practice in the field of neuropsychology.Results: The area of professional training contained the highest percentage of perception of ethical misconduct, followed by research and publications, clinical care, and professional relationships. Conclusion: The high frequency of ethical misconduct perceived by neuropsychology professionals in Mexico is a cause for concern. The results suggest the need to create and implement a system to make sure that professionals follow the ethics standards required by the profession, and to provide consequences for those who fail to do so. The profession of neuropsychology and training of professionals in the field must be regularized in the country, to reduce the frequency of future ethical misconducts. Paola FonsecaLaiene Olabarrieta LandaIvan PanyavinXóchitl Angélica Ortiz JiménezAdriana Aguayo ArelisBrenda Viridiana Rabago BarajasYaneth Rodriguez AgudeloJuan Carlos Arango LasprillaUniversidad de San BuenaventuraarticleEthicsneuropsychologyclinical practiceMexicoPsychologyBF1-990ENESInternational Journal of Psychological Research, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN ES |
topic |
Ethics neuropsychology clinical practice Mexico Psychology BF1-990 |
spellingShingle |
Ethics neuropsychology clinical practice Mexico Psychology BF1-990 Paola Fonseca Laiene Olabarrieta Landa Ivan Panyavin Xóchitl Angélica Ortiz Jiménez Adriana Aguayo Arelis Brenda Viridiana Rabago Barajas Yaneth Rodriguez Agudelo Juan Carlos Arango Lasprilla Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the frequency of perceived ethical misconduct in the practice of neuropsychology in Mexico. Method: One hundred fourteen psychologists answered a survey which assessed perceptions of ethical misconduct in four areas of professional practice in the field of neuropsychology.Results: The area of professional training contained the highest percentage of perception of ethical misconduct, followed by research and publications, clinical care, and professional relationships. Conclusion: The high frequency of ethical misconduct perceived by neuropsychology professionals in Mexico is a cause for concern. The results suggest the need to create and implement a system to make sure that professionals follow the ethics standards required by the profession, and to provide consequences for those who fail to do so. The profession of neuropsychology and training of professionals in the field must be regularized in the country, to reduce the frequency of future ethical misconducts.
|
format |
article |
author |
Paola Fonseca Laiene Olabarrieta Landa Ivan Panyavin Xóchitl Angélica Ortiz Jiménez Adriana Aguayo Arelis Brenda Viridiana Rabago Barajas Yaneth Rodriguez Agudelo Juan Carlos Arango Lasprilla |
author_facet |
Paola Fonseca Laiene Olabarrieta Landa Ivan Panyavin Xóchitl Angélica Ortiz Jiménez Adriana Aguayo Arelis Brenda Viridiana Rabago Barajas Yaneth Rodriguez Agudelo Juan Carlos Arango Lasprilla |
author_sort |
Paola Fonseca |
title |
Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico |
title_short |
Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico |
title_full |
Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico |
title_fullStr |
Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in Mexico |
title_sort |
perceived ethical misconduct: a survey of neuropsychology professionals in mexico |
publisher |
Universidad de San Buenaventura |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/5e6f828f266d4535a212c9f91c005e60 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paolafonseca perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico AT laieneolabarrietalanda perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico AT ivanpanyavin perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico AT xochitlangelicaortizjimenez perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico AT adrianaaguayoarelis perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico AT brendaviridianarabagobarajas perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico AT yanethrodriguezagudelo perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico AT juancarlosarangolasprilla perceivedethicalmisconductasurveyofneuropsychologyprofessionalsinmexico |
_version_ |
1718414696032239616 |