The Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry

The objective of this research is to investigate how the current animal welfare regulatory approach in Australia is applied to domesticated rabbits with emphasis on rabbits used for meat. Australia’s animal welfare regime is critically examined by assessing the effectiveness of the Model Code of Pr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Reem Lascelles
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
Publicado: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Dret 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5ea20e25d26b4cb8941af8b06e81c37a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5ea20e25d26b4cb8941af8b06e81c37a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5ea20e25d26b4cb8941af8b06e81c37a2021-11-27T08:43:21ZThe Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry10.5565/rev/da.4192462-7518https://doaj.org/article/5ea20e25d26b4cb8941af8b06e81c37a2019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistes.uab.cat/da/article/view/419https://doaj.org/toc/2462-7518 The objective of this research is to investigate how the current animal welfare regulatory approach in Australia is applied to domesticated rabbits with emphasis on rabbits used for meat. Australia’s animal welfare regime is critically examined by assessing the effectiveness of the Model Code of Practice for Animal Welfare: Intensive Husbandry of Rabbits (MCOPIHR) and the Five Freedoms in practice and what they mean to the actual wellbeing of rabbits in meat farms. Recent scientific knowledge in animal behaviour informs us that keeping any animal in extreme confinement, such as rabbits used for meat in intensive farms, has serious welfare concerns resulting in physical and psychological suffering. It is within this context that this thesis asks whether the concept of animal welfare in the caged rabbit meat industry is in effect an oxymoron. This thesis draws on work by Bekoff and Pierce’s ethological approach to support my critique of animal welfare practices in Australia’s rabbit meat industry. I also use Garner’s theory of incremental change in animal welfare reform, in which he argues for using current knowledge in animal welfare to push the boundaries of what is considered ‘unnecessary suffering’, as a social driver for a moral shift aimed at effecting law reform. To complement Garner’s political theory of incremental change I deploy Spira’s approach to advocacy, as practical tools for realising change.  Reem LascellesUniversitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de DretarticleAnimal WelfareRabbit Meat IndustryModel Code of PracticeFive FreedomsEthologyDomesticated RabbitsAnimal cultureSF1-1100Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENESDerecho Animal, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
topic Animal Welfare
Rabbit Meat Industry
Model Code of Practice
Five Freedoms
Ethology
Domesticated Rabbits
Animal culture
SF1-1100
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
spellingShingle Animal Welfare
Rabbit Meat Industry
Model Code of Practice
Five Freedoms
Ethology
Domesticated Rabbits
Animal culture
SF1-1100
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
K1-7720
Reem Lascelles
The Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry
description The objective of this research is to investigate how the current animal welfare regulatory approach in Australia is applied to domesticated rabbits with emphasis on rabbits used for meat. Australia’s animal welfare regime is critically examined by assessing the effectiveness of the Model Code of Practice for Animal Welfare: Intensive Husbandry of Rabbits (MCOPIHR) and the Five Freedoms in practice and what they mean to the actual wellbeing of rabbits in meat farms. Recent scientific knowledge in animal behaviour informs us that keeping any animal in extreme confinement, such as rabbits used for meat in intensive farms, has serious welfare concerns resulting in physical and psychological suffering. It is within this context that this thesis asks whether the concept of animal welfare in the caged rabbit meat industry is in effect an oxymoron. This thesis draws on work by Bekoff and Pierce’s ethological approach to support my critique of animal welfare practices in Australia’s rabbit meat industry. I also use Garner’s theory of incremental change in animal welfare reform, in which he argues for using current knowledge in animal welfare to push the boundaries of what is considered ‘unnecessary suffering’, as a social driver for a moral shift aimed at effecting law reform. To complement Garner’s political theory of incremental change I deploy Spira’s approach to advocacy, as practical tools for realising change. 
format article
author Reem Lascelles
author_facet Reem Lascelles
author_sort Reem Lascelles
title The Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry
title_short The Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry
title_full The Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry
title_fullStr The Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry
title_full_unstemmed The Oxymoron of Caged Animal Welfare: A Case Study in The Australian Caged Rabbit Meat Industry
title_sort oxymoron of caged animal welfare: a case study in the australian caged rabbit meat industry
publisher Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. Facultat de Dret
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/5ea20e25d26b4cb8941af8b06e81c37a
work_keys_str_mv AT reemlascelles theoxymoronofcagedanimalwelfareacasestudyintheaustraliancagedrabbitmeatindustry
AT reemlascelles oxymoronofcagedanimalwelfareacasestudyintheaustraliancagedrabbitmeatindustry
_version_ 1718409106397593600