Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

A systematic review of primary prevention was conducted for cannabis use outcomes in youth and young adults. The aim of the review was to develop a comprehensive understanding of prevention programming by assessing universal, targeted, uni-modal, and multi-modal approaches as well as individual prog...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melissa M Norberg, Sarah Kezelman, Nicholas Lim-Howe
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5eb1f6e8d1ef42a4b55d4baa0a9563f3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5eb1f6e8d1ef42a4b55d4baa0a9563f3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5eb1f6e8d1ef42a4b55d4baa0a9563f32021-11-18T08:01:52ZPrimary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0053187https://doaj.org/article/5eb1f6e8d1ef42a4b55d4baa0a9563f32013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23326396/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203A systematic review of primary prevention was conducted for cannabis use outcomes in youth and young adults. The aim of the review was to develop a comprehensive understanding of prevention programming by assessing universal, targeted, uni-modal, and multi-modal approaches as well as individual program characteristics. Twenty-eight articles, representing 25 unique studies, identified from eight electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, DRUG, EBM Reviews, and Project CORK), were eligible for inclusion. Results indicated that primary prevention programs can be effective in reducing cannabis use in youth populations, with statistically significant effect sizes ranging from trivial (0.07) to extremely large (5.26), with the majority of significant effect sizes being trivial to small. Given that the preponderance of significant effect sizes were trivial to small and that percentages of statistically significant and non-statistically significant findings were often equivalent across program type and individual components, the effectiveness of primary prevention for cannabis use should be interpreted with caution. Universal multi-modal programs appeared to outperform other program types (i.e, universal uni-modal, targeted multi-modal, targeted unimodal). Specifically, universal multi-modal programs that targeted early adolescents (10-13 year olds), utilised non-teacher or multiple facilitators, were short in duration (10 sessions or less), and implemented boosters sessions were associated with large median effect sizes. While there were studies in these areas that contradicted these results, the results highlight the importance of assessing the interdependent relationship of program components and program types. Finally, results indicated that the overall quality of included studies was poor, with an average quality rating of 4.64 out of 9. Thus, further quality research and reporting and the development of new innovative programs are required.Melissa M NorbergSarah KezelmanNicholas Lim-HowePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 1, p e53187 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Melissa M Norberg
Sarah Kezelman
Nicholas Lim-Howe
Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
description A systematic review of primary prevention was conducted for cannabis use outcomes in youth and young adults. The aim of the review was to develop a comprehensive understanding of prevention programming by assessing universal, targeted, uni-modal, and multi-modal approaches as well as individual program characteristics. Twenty-eight articles, representing 25 unique studies, identified from eight electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, DRUG, EBM Reviews, and Project CORK), were eligible for inclusion. Results indicated that primary prevention programs can be effective in reducing cannabis use in youth populations, with statistically significant effect sizes ranging from trivial (0.07) to extremely large (5.26), with the majority of significant effect sizes being trivial to small. Given that the preponderance of significant effect sizes were trivial to small and that percentages of statistically significant and non-statistically significant findings were often equivalent across program type and individual components, the effectiveness of primary prevention for cannabis use should be interpreted with caution. Universal multi-modal programs appeared to outperform other program types (i.e, universal uni-modal, targeted multi-modal, targeted unimodal). Specifically, universal multi-modal programs that targeted early adolescents (10-13 year olds), utilised non-teacher or multiple facilitators, were short in duration (10 sessions or less), and implemented boosters sessions were associated with large median effect sizes. While there were studies in these areas that contradicted these results, the results highlight the importance of assessing the interdependent relationship of program components and program types. Finally, results indicated that the overall quality of included studies was poor, with an average quality rating of 4.64 out of 9. Thus, further quality research and reporting and the development of new innovative programs are required.
format article
author Melissa M Norberg
Sarah Kezelman
Nicholas Lim-Howe
author_facet Melissa M Norberg
Sarah Kezelman
Nicholas Lim-Howe
author_sort Melissa M Norberg
title Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/5eb1f6e8d1ef42a4b55d4baa0a9563f3
work_keys_str_mv AT melissamnorberg primarypreventionofcannabisuseasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sarahkezelman primarypreventionofcannabisuseasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT nicholaslimhowe primarypreventionofcannabisuseasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1718422605219758080