3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues

Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer globally in men, and in some countries is now the most diagnosed form of cancer. It is necessary to differentiate between benign and malignant prostate conditions to give accurate diagnoses. We aim to demonstrate the use of a 3D Mueller matri...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volodymyr A. Ushenko, Benjamin T. Hogan, Alexander Dubolazov, Gennadii Piavchenko, Sergey L. Kuznetsov, Alexander G. Ushenko, Yuriy O. Ushenko, Mykhailo Gorsky, Alexander Bykov, Igor Meglinski
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5ef4bffc79d5479eb11bd1fb52bf9ebc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5ef4bffc79d5479eb11bd1fb52bf9ebc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5ef4bffc79d5479eb11bd1fb52bf9ebc2021-12-02T13:34:58Z3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues10.1038/s41598-021-83986-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/5ef4bffc79d5479eb11bd1fb52bf9ebc2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83986-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer globally in men, and in some countries is now the most diagnosed form of cancer. It is necessary to differentiate between benign and malignant prostate conditions to give accurate diagnoses. We aim to demonstrate the use of a 3D Mueller matrix method to allow quick and easy clinical differentiation between prostate adenoma and carcinoma tissues with different grades and Gleason scores. Histological sections of benign and malignant prostate tumours, obtained by radical prostatectomy, were investigated. We map the degree of depolarisation in the different prostate tumour tissues using a Mueller matrix polarimeter set-up, based on the superposition of a reference laser beam with the interference pattern of the sample in the image plane. The depolarisation distributions can be directly related to the morphology of the biological tissues. The dependences of the magnitude of the 1st to 4th order statistical moments of the depolarisation distribution are determined, which characterise the distributions of the depolarisation values. To determine the diagnostic potential of the method three groups of histological sections of prostate tumour biopsies were formed. The first group contained 36 adenoma tissue samples, while the second contained 36 carcinoma tissue samples of a high grade (grade 4: poorly differentiated—4 + 4 Gleason score), and the third group contained 36 carcinoma tissue samples of a low grade (grade 1: moderately differentiated—3 + 3 Gleason score). Using the calculated values of the statistical moments, tumour tissues are categorised as either adenoma or carcinoma. A high level (> 90%) accuracy of differentiation between adenoma and carcinoma samples was achieved for each group. Differentiation between the high-grade and low-grade carcinoma samples was achieved with an accuracy of 87.5%. The results demonstrate that Mueller matrix mapping of the depolarisation distribution of prostate tumour tissues can accurately differentiate between adenoma and carcinoma, and between different grades of carcinoma. This represents a first step towards the implementation of 3D Mueller matrix mapping for clinical analysis and diagnosis of prostate tumours.Volodymyr A. UshenkoBenjamin T. HoganAlexander DubolazovGennadii PiavchenkoSergey L. KuznetsovAlexander G. UshenkoYuriy O. UshenkoMykhailo GorskyAlexander BykovIgor MeglinskiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Volodymyr A. Ushenko
Benjamin T. Hogan
Alexander Dubolazov
Gennadii Piavchenko
Sergey L. Kuznetsov
Alexander G. Ushenko
Yuriy O. Ushenko
Mykhailo Gorsky
Alexander Bykov
Igor Meglinski
3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues
description Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer globally in men, and in some countries is now the most diagnosed form of cancer. It is necessary to differentiate between benign and malignant prostate conditions to give accurate diagnoses. We aim to demonstrate the use of a 3D Mueller matrix method to allow quick and easy clinical differentiation between prostate adenoma and carcinoma tissues with different grades and Gleason scores. Histological sections of benign and malignant prostate tumours, obtained by radical prostatectomy, were investigated. We map the degree of depolarisation in the different prostate tumour tissues using a Mueller matrix polarimeter set-up, based on the superposition of a reference laser beam with the interference pattern of the sample in the image plane. The depolarisation distributions can be directly related to the morphology of the biological tissues. The dependences of the magnitude of the 1st to 4th order statistical moments of the depolarisation distribution are determined, which characterise the distributions of the depolarisation values. To determine the diagnostic potential of the method three groups of histological sections of prostate tumour biopsies were formed. The first group contained 36 adenoma tissue samples, while the second contained 36 carcinoma tissue samples of a high grade (grade 4: poorly differentiated—4 + 4 Gleason score), and the third group contained 36 carcinoma tissue samples of a low grade (grade 1: moderately differentiated—3 + 3 Gleason score). Using the calculated values of the statistical moments, tumour tissues are categorised as either adenoma or carcinoma. A high level (> 90%) accuracy of differentiation between adenoma and carcinoma samples was achieved for each group. Differentiation between the high-grade and low-grade carcinoma samples was achieved with an accuracy of 87.5%. The results demonstrate that Mueller matrix mapping of the depolarisation distribution of prostate tumour tissues can accurately differentiate between adenoma and carcinoma, and between different grades of carcinoma. This represents a first step towards the implementation of 3D Mueller matrix mapping for clinical analysis and diagnosis of prostate tumours.
format article
author Volodymyr A. Ushenko
Benjamin T. Hogan
Alexander Dubolazov
Gennadii Piavchenko
Sergey L. Kuznetsov
Alexander G. Ushenko
Yuriy O. Ushenko
Mykhailo Gorsky
Alexander Bykov
Igor Meglinski
author_facet Volodymyr A. Ushenko
Benjamin T. Hogan
Alexander Dubolazov
Gennadii Piavchenko
Sergey L. Kuznetsov
Alexander G. Ushenko
Yuriy O. Ushenko
Mykhailo Gorsky
Alexander Bykov
Igor Meglinski
author_sort Volodymyr A. Ushenko
title 3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues
title_short 3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues
title_full 3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues
title_fullStr 3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues
title_full_unstemmed 3D Mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues
title_sort 3d mueller matrix mapping of layered distributions of depolarisation degree for analysis of prostate adenoma and carcinoma diffuse tissues
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5ef4bffc79d5479eb11bd1fb52bf9ebc
work_keys_str_mv AT volodymyraushenko 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT benjaminthogan 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT alexanderdubolazov 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT gennadiipiavchenko 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT sergeylkuznetsov 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT alexandergushenko 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT yuriyoushenko 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT mykhailogorsky 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT alexanderbykov 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
AT igormeglinski 3dmuellermatrixmappingoflayereddistributionsofdepolarisationdegreeforanalysisofprostateadenomaandcarcinomadiffusetissues
_version_ 1718392738621161472