Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts

Abstract Background For humanitarian organisations to respond effectively to complex crises, they require access to up-to-date evidence-based guidance. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of updating global guidance to context-specific and evolving needs in humanitarian settings. Our...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alex Odlum, Rosemary James, Audrey Mahieu, Karl Blanchet, Chiara Altare, Neha Singh, Paul Spiegel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5f19998e0ba34d00854201f0db44def6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5f19998e0ba34d00854201f0db44def6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5f19998e0ba34d00854201f0db44def62021-11-21T12:07:42ZUse of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts10.1186/s13031-021-00418-w1752-1505https://doaj.org/article/5f19998e0ba34d00854201f0db44def62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00418-whttps://doaj.org/toc/1752-1505Abstract Background For humanitarian organisations to respond effectively to complex crises, they require access to up-to-date evidence-based guidance. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of updating global guidance to context-specific and evolving needs in humanitarian settings. Our study aimed to understand the use of evidence-based guidance in humanitarian responses during COVID-19. Primary data collected during the rapidly evolving pandemic sheds new light on evidence-use processes in humanitarian response. Methods We collected and analysed COVID-19 guidance documents, and conducted semi-structured interviews remotely with a variety of humanitarian organisations responding and adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform, a website established by three universities in March 2020, to solicit, collate and document these experiences and knowledge. Results We analysed 131 guidance documents and conducted 80 interviews with humanitarian organisations, generating 61 published field experiences. Although COVID-19 guidance was quickly developed and disseminated in the initial phases of the crisis (from January to May 2020), updates or ongoing revision of the guidance has been limited. Interviews conducted between April and September 2020 showed that humanitarian organisations have responded to COVID-19 in innovative and context-specific ways, but have often had to adapt existing guidance to inform their operations in complex humanitarian settings. Conclusions Experiences from the field indicate that humanitarian organisations consulted guidance to respond and adapt to COVID-19, but whether referring to available guidance indicates evidence use depends on its accessibility, coherence, contextual relevance and trustworthiness. Feedback loops through online platforms like the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform that relay details of these evidence-use processes to global guidance setters could improve future humanitarian response.Alex OdlumRosemary JamesAudrey MahieuKarl BlanchetChiara AltareNeha SinghPaul SpiegelBMCarticleCOVID-19HumanitarianEvidenceGuidanceOnline platformSpecial situations and conditionsRC952-1245Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aidRC86-88.9ENConflict and Health, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic COVID-19
Humanitarian
Evidence
Guidance
Online platform
Special situations and conditions
RC952-1245
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
spellingShingle COVID-19
Humanitarian
Evidence
Guidance
Online platform
Special situations and conditions
RC952-1245
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
Alex Odlum
Rosemary James
Audrey Mahieu
Karl Blanchet
Chiara Altare
Neha Singh
Paul Spiegel
Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
description Abstract Background For humanitarian organisations to respond effectively to complex crises, they require access to up-to-date evidence-based guidance. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of updating global guidance to context-specific and evolving needs in humanitarian settings. Our study aimed to understand the use of evidence-based guidance in humanitarian responses during COVID-19. Primary data collected during the rapidly evolving pandemic sheds new light on evidence-use processes in humanitarian response. Methods We collected and analysed COVID-19 guidance documents, and conducted semi-structured interviews remotely with a variety of humanitarian organisations responding and adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform, a website established by three universities in March 2020, to solicit, collate and document these experiences and knowledge. Results We analysed 131 guidance documents and conducted 80 interviews with humanitarian organisations, generating 61 published field experiences. Although COVID-19 guidance was quickly developed and disseminated in the initial phases of the crisis (from January to May 2020), updates or ongoing revision of the guidance has been limited. Interviews conducted between April and September 2020 showed that humanitarian organisations have responded to COVID-19 in innovative and context-specific ways, but have often had to adapt existing guidance to inform their operations in complex humanitarian settings. Conclusions Experiences from the field indicate that humanitarian organisations consulted guidance to respond and adapt to COVID-19, but whether referring to available guidance indicates evidence use depends on its accessibility, coherence, contextual relevance and trustworthiness. Feedback loops through online platforms like the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform that relay details of these evidence-use processes to global guidance setters could improve future humanitarian response.
format article
author Alex Odlum
Rosemary James
Audrey Mahieu
Karl Blanchet
Chiara Altare
Neha Singh
Paul Spiegel
author_facet Alex Odlum
Rosemary James
Audrey Mahieu
Karl Blanchet
Chiara Altare
Neha Singh
Paul Spiegel
author_sort Alex Odlum
title Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
title_short Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
title_full Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
title_fullStr Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
title_full_unstemmed Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
title_sort use of covid-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5f19998e0ba34d00854201f0db44def6
work_keys_str_mv AT alexodlum useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts
AT rosemaryjames useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts
AT audreymahieu useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts
AT karlblanchet useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts
AT chiaraaltare useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts
AT nehasingh useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts
AT paulspiegel useofcovid19evidenceinhumanitariansettingstheneedfordynamicguidanceadaptedtochanginghumanitariancrisiscontexts
_version_ 1718419187628507136