Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles

Mohamed HM Hosny, Ahmad MM ShalabyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptPurpose: To evaluate the in vivo aberrometric performance of two phakic intraocular lenses (PIOLs); the Visian implantable contact lens (ICL) and the AcrySof Cachet PIOL.Methods: Thirty...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hosny MHM, Shalaby AMM
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:	Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5f384e4237cd415386bebcfe2f817f90
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5f384e4237cd415386bebcfe2f817f90
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5f384e4237cd415386bebcfe2f817f902021-12-02T02:27:30ZVisian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/5f384e4237cd415386bebcfe2f817f902013-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/visian-implantable-contact-lens-versus-acrysof-cachet-phakic-intraocul-a13725https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Mohamed HM Hosny, Ahmad MM ShalabyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptPurpose: To evaluate the in vivo aberrometric performance of two phakic intraocular lenses (PIOLs); the Visian implantable contact lens (ICL) and the AcrySof Cachet PIOL.Methods: Thirty eight eyes from 29 patients with an age range of 23–32 years and more than 9 D of myopia were divided into two groups; one group of 20 eyes received a Visian ICL model V4c, another group of 18 eyes received an AcrySof Cachet PIOL. Total higher order aberrations (HOAs) root mean square, total coma, and total spherical aberrations were recorded pre and 6 weeks postoperatively to evaluate and compare the aberrometric performance of the Visian ICL and the AcrySof Cachet PIOL implanted in highly myopic patients.Results: Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in any studied parameters, except for preoperative spherical equivalent. Postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in the induction of HOAs between both PIOLs. The reduction in spherical aberrations was statistically significant in each group as well as in all study patients.Conclusion: Both AcrySof Cachet PIOL and ICLs are effective phakic implants to correct high refractive errors. They both induce small amounts of negative spherical aberration that do not affect the total HOAs, yet reduce the positive ocular spherical aberration. This result is expected to improve the quality of vision in such patients.Keywords: high myopia, higher order aberrations, refractive procedures, phakic implantsHosny MHMShalaby AMMDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2013, Iss default, Pp 1477-1486 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	Ophthalmology RE1-994 Hosny MHM Shalaby AMM Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
description	Mohamed HM Hosny, Ahmad MM ShalabyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptPurpose: To evaluate the in vivo aberrometric performance of two phakic intraocular lenses (PIOLs); the Visian implantable contact lens (ICL) and the AcrySof Cachet PIOL.Methods: Thirty eight eyes from 29 patients with an age range of 23–32 years and more than 9 D of myopia were divided into two groups; one group of 20 eyes received a Visian ICL model V4c, another group of 18 eyes received an AcrySof Cachet PIOL. Total higher order aberrations (HOAs) root mean square, total coma, and total spherical aberrations were recorded pre and 6 weeks postoperatively to evaluate and compare the aberrometric performance of the Visian ICL and the AcrySof Cachet PIOL implanted in highly myopic patients.Results: Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in any studied parameters, except for preoperative spherical equivalent. Postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in the induction of HOAs between both PIOLs. The reduction in spherical aberrations was statistically significant in each group as well as in all study patients.Conclusion: Both AcrySof Cachet PIOL and ICLs are effective phakic implants to correct high refractive errors. They both induce small amounts of negative spherical aberration that do not affect the total HOAs, yet reduce the positive ocular spherical aberration. This result is expected to improve the quality of vision in such patients.Keywords: high myopia, higher order aberrations, refractive procedures, phakic implants
format	article
author	Hosny MHM Shalaby AMM
author_facet	Hosny MHM Shalaby AMM
author_sort	Hosny MHM
title	Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
title_short	Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
title_full	Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
title_fullStr	Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
title_full_unstemmed	Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
title_sort	visian implantable contact lens versus acrysof cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/5f384e4237cd415386bebcfe2f817f90
work_keys_str_mv	AT hosnymhm visianimplantablecontactlensversusacrysofcachetphakicintraocularlensescomparisonofaberrmetricprofiles AT shalabyamm visianimplantablecontactlensversusacrysofcachetphakicintraocularlensescomparisonofaberrmetricprofiles
_version_	1718402470331285504

Visian implantable contact lens versus AcrySof Cachet phakic intraocular lenses: comparison of aberrmetric profiles

Ejemplares similares