In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity

Background Immunotherapies, driven by immune-mediated antitumorigenicity, offer the potential for significant improvements to the treatment of multiple cancer types. Identifying therapeutic strategies that bolster antitumor immunity while limiting immune suppression is critical to selecting treatmen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault, Adrianne L Jenner, Tyler Cassidy, Katia Belaid, Morgan Craig
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/5f4f68d6770b4180ada4a0d95539be66
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:5f4f68d6770b4180ada4a0d95539be66
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:5f4f68d6770b4180ada4a0d95539be662021-11-15T23:00:05ZIn silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity10.1136/jitc-2020-0013872051-1426https://doaj.org/article/5f4f68d6770b4180ada4a0d95539be662021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jitc.bmj.com/content/9/2/e001387.fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2051-1426Background Immunotherapies, driven by immune-mediated antitumorigenicity, offer the potential for significant improvements to the treatment of multiple cancer types. Identifying therapeutic strategies that bolster antitumor immunity while limiting immune suppression is critical to selecting treatment combinations and schedules that offer durable therapeutic benefits. Combination oncolytic virus (OV) therapy, wherein complementary OVs are administered in succession, offer such promise, yet their translation from preclinical studies to clinical implementation is a major challenge. Overcoming this obstacle requires answering fundamental questions about how to effectively design and tailor schedules to provide the most benefit to patients.Methods We developed a computational biology model of combined oncolytic vaccinia (an enhancer virus) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) calibrated to and validated against multiple data sources. We then optimized protocols in a cohort of heterogeneous virtual individuals by leveraging this model and our previously established in silico clinical trial platform.Results Enhancer multiplicity was shown to have little to no impact on the average response to therapy. However, the duration of the VSV injection lag was found to be determinant for survival outcomes. Importantly, through treatment individualization, we found that optimal combination schedules are closely linked to tumor aggressivity. We predicted that patients with aggressively growing tumors required a single enhancer followed by a VSV injection 1 day later, whereas a small subset of patients with the slowest growing tumors needed multiple enhancers followed by a longer VSV delay of 15 days, suggesting that intrinsic tumor growth rates could inform the segregation of patients into clinical trials and ultimately determine patient survival. These results were validated in entirely new cohorts of virtual individuals with aggressive or non-aggressive subtypes.Conclusions Based on our results, improved therapeutic schedules for combinations with enhancer OVs can be studied and implemented. Our results further underline the impact of interdisciplinary approaches to preclinical planning and the importance of computational approaches to drug discovery and development.Marie-Claude Bourgeois-DaigneaultAdrianne L JennerTyler CassidyKatia BelaidMorgan CraigBMJ Publishing GrouparticleNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, Vol 9, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault
Adrianne L Jenner
Tyler Cassidy
Katia Belaid
Morgan Craig
In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity
description Background Immunotherapies, driven by immune-mediated antitumorigenicity, offer the potential for significant improvements to the treatment of multiple cancer types. Identifying therapeutic strategies that bolster antitumor immunity while limiting immune suppression is critical to selecting treatment combinations and schedules that offer durable therapeutic benefits. Combination oncolytic virus (OV) therapy, wherein complementary OVs are administered in succession, offer such promise, yet their translation from preclinical studies to clinical implementation is a major challenge. Overcoming this obstacle requires answering fundamental questions about how to effectively design and tailor schedules to provide the most benefit to patients.Methods We developed a computational biology model of combined oncolytic vaccinia (an enhancer virus) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) calibrated to and validated against multiple data sources. We then optimized protocols in a cohort of heterogeneous virtual individuals by leveraging this model and our previously established in silico clinical trial platform.Results Enhancer multiplicity was shown to have little to no impact on the average response to therapy. However, the duration of the VSV injection lag was found to be determinant for survival outcomes. Importantly, through treatment individualization, we found that optimal combination schedules are closely linked to tumor aggressivity. We predicted that patients with aggressively growing tumors required a single enhancer followed by a VSV injection 1 day later, whereas a small subset of patients with the slowest growing tumors needed multiple enhancers followed by a longer VSV delay of 15 days, suggesting that intrinsic tumor growth rates could inform the segregation of patients into clinical trials and ultimately determine patient survival. These results were validated in entirely new cohorts of virtual individuals with aggressive or non-aggressive subtypes.Conclusions Based on our results, improved therapeutic schedules for combinations with enhancer OVs can be studied and implemented. Our results further underline the impact of interdisciplinary approaches to preclinical planning and the importance of computational approaches to drug discovery and development.
format article
author Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault
Adrianne L Jenner
Tyler Cassidy
Katia Belaid
Morgan Craig
author_facet Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault
Adrianne L Jenner
Tyler Cassidy
Katia Belaid
Morgan Craig
author_sort Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault
title In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity
title_short In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity
title_full In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity
title_fullStr In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity
title_full_unstemmed In silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity
title_sort in silico trials predict that combination strategies for enhancing vesicular stomatitis oncolytic virus are determined by tumor aggressivity
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/5f4f68d6770b4180ada4a0d95539be66
work_keys_str_mv AT marieclaudebourgeoisdaigneault insilicotrialspredictthatcombinationstrategiesforenhancingvesicularstomatitisoncolyticvirusaredeterminedbytumoraggressivity
AT adrianneljenner insilicotrialspredictthatcombinationstrategiesforenhancingvesicularstomatitisoncolyticvirusaredeterminedbytumoraggressivity
AT tylercassidy insilicotrialspredictthatcombinationstrategiesforenhancingvesicularstomatitisoncolyticvirusaredeterminedbytumoraggressivity
AT katiabelaid insilicotrialspredictthatcombinationstrategiesforenhancingvesicularstomatitisoncolyticvirusaredeterminedbytumoraggressivity
AT morgancraig insilicotrialspredictthatcombinationstrategiesforenhancingvesicularstomatitisoncolyticvirusaredeterminedbytumoraggressivity
_version_ 1718426789537120256