«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»

The author ponders on the causes of the crisis of democraticmodels in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and the Baltic states. Having analysed a complex of factors, she comes to the conclusion that the authoritarian transition of European peripheral countries in the inte...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	E. G. Ponomareva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2009
Materias:	периферийные страны межвоенная европа авторитарный транзит военно-бюрократический режим (польша литва) корпоративный (цеховой) режим (латвия чехословакия) дототалитарный (фашистский мобилизационный) режим (венгрия) национализм национальное государство International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/5f72ee2b525245198306e683f0cc0d66
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:5f72ee2b525245198306e683f0cc0d66
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:5f72ee2b525245198306e683f0cc0d662021-11-23T14:50:44Z«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2009-6-9-188-199https://doaj.org/article/5f72ee2b525245198306e683f0cc0d662009-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/2794https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The author ponders on the causes of the crisis of democraticmodels in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and the Baltic states. Having analysed a complex of factors, she comes to the conclusion that the authoritarian transition of European peripheral countries in the interwar period (1918—1939) was appropriate. While all authoritarian regimes of the period in the region under study were characterized by three foundations of authoritarianism– Fuhrerprinzip, ideas of constructing nationstate and nationalism, specific traits allow to distinguish between three clusters of authoritarian regimes in the interwar Europe: military-bureaucratic, corporate (guild) and pre-totalitarian (fascist mobilization) ones. However, the main conclusion is: the complex economic, political and socio-cultural situation in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and the Baltic states aggravated by the consequences of globalization and world financial crisis is able to provoke recurrences of authoritarian transition.E. G. PonomarevaMGIMO University Pressarticleпериферийные странымежвоенная европаавторитарный транзитвоенно-бюрократический режим (польшалитва)корпоративный (цеховой) режим (латвиячехословакия)дототалитарный (фашистский мобилизационный) режим (венгрия)национализмнациональное государствоInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 6(9), Pp 188-199 (2009)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	периферийные страны межвоенная европа авторитарный транзит военно-бюрократический режим (польша литва) корпоративный (цеховой) режим (латвия чехословакия) дототалитарный (фашистский мобилизационный) режим (венгрия) национализм национальное государство International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	периферийные страны межвоенная европа авторитарный транзит военно-бюрократический режим (польша литва) корпоративный (цеховой) режим (латвия чехословакия) дототалитарный (фашистский мобилизационный) режим (венгрия) национализм национальное государство International relations JZ2-6530 E. G. Ponomareva «Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»
description	The author ponders on the causes of the crisis of democraticmodels in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and the Baltic states. Having analysed a complex of factors, she comes to the conclusion that the authoritarian transition of European peripheral countries in the interwar period (1918—1939) was appropriate. While all authoritarian regimes of the period in the region under study were characterized by three foundations of authoritarianism– Fuhrerprinzip, ideas of constructing nationstate and nationalism, specific traits allow to distinguish between three clusters of authoritarian regimes in the interwar Europe: military-bureaucratic, corporate (guild) and pre-totalitarian (fascist mobilization) ones. However, the main conclusion is: the complex economic, political and socio-cultural situation in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and the Baltic states aggravated by the consequences of globalization and world financial crisis is able to provoke recurrences of authoritarian transition.
format	article
author	E. G. Ponomareva
author_facet	E. G. Ponomareva
author_sort	E. G. Ponomareva
title	«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»
title_short	«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»
title_full	«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»
title_fullStr	«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»
title_full_unstemmed	«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»
title_sort	«authoritarian transition of peripheral countries of interwar europe: politological analysis»
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2009
url	https://doaj.org/article/5f72ee2b525245198306e683f0cc0d66
work_keys_str_mv	AT egponomareva authoritariantransitionofperipheralcountriesofinterwareuropepolitologicalanalysis
_version_	1718416585700409344

«Authoritarian Transition of Peripheral Countries of Interwar Europe: Politological Analysis»

Ejemplares similares