Bias correction capabilities of quantile mapping methods for rainfall and temperature variables
This study aims to conduct a thorough investigation to compare the abilities of quantile mapping (QM) techniques as a bias correction method for the raw outputs from general circulation model (GCM)/regional climate model (RCM) combinations. The Karkheh River basin in Iran was selected as a case stud...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
IWA Publishing
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5f8afecda5c04fad85a0e08f3910d950 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | This study aims to conduct a thorough investigation to compare the abilities of quantile mapping (QM) techniques as a bias correction method for the raw outputs from general circulation model (GCM)/regional climate model (RCM) combinations. The Karkheh River basin in Iran was selected as a case study, due to its diverse topographic features, to test the performances of the bias correction methods under different conditions. The outputs of two GCM/RCM combinations (ICHEC and NOAA-ESM) were acquired from the coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment (CORDEX) dataset for this study. The results indicated that the performances of the QMs varied, depending on the transformation functions, parameter sets, and topographic conditions. In some cases, the QMs' adjustments even made the GCM/RCM combinations' raw outputs worse. The result of this study suggested that apart from DIST, PTF:scale, and SSPLIN, the rest of the considered QM methods can provide relatively improved results for both rainfall and temperature variables. It should be noted that, according to the results obtained from the diverse topographic conditions of the sub-basins, the empirical quantiles (QUANT) and robust empirical quantiles (RQUANT) methods proved to be excellent options to correct the bias of rainfall data, while all bias correction methods, with the notable exceptions of performed PTF:scale and SSPLIN, performed relatively well for the temperature variable. HIGHLIGHTS
Quantile mapping (QM) techniques are among the most important and popular bias correction methods. This study aims to provide a comprehensive comparison to identify the potential strengths and weaknesses of these methods in coping with hydro-climatic variables.;
This study aims to shed light on the general abilities of QM methods in correcting the bias of both temperature and rainfall variables, both of which can have direct and indirect impacts on water resources. Furthermore, this study explores these capabilities in diverse topographic conditions. Coping with such topographic conditions is a known challenge for both general and regional circulation models.;
This study explores the projections of the coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment (CORDEX) dataset. The main idea behind the CORDEX project is to coordinate the results of local climatic studies. As such, the findings of this study can help expand the capabilities and applicability of this project.;
The results of this study revealed that some QM methods could, in fact, worsen the accuracy of general and regional circulation models, which highlights the importance of selecting a suitable bias correction method.;
According to the results obtained from the diverse topographic conditions of the sub-basins, the empirical quantiles (QUANT) and robust empirical quantiles (RQUANT) methods proved to be excellent options to correct the bias of rainfall data, while all bias correction methods, with the notable exceptions of performed PTF:scale and SSPLIN, performed relatively well for the temperature variable.; |
|---|