Different strokes for different folk: Regulatory distinctions in New Zealand media
For much of the past century there was broad acceptance of the stark contrast between the state’s involvement in the regulation of the content of broadcasting and its laissez-faire relationship with the columns of the press. The ‘failed market’ argument that substantiated regulation of the airwaves...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Gavin Ellis |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Asia Pacific Network
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/5ff211e3e0ae48b7949805787ad969be |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Six Oceania microstates: The genesis of media accountability
por: Shailendra Singh
Publicado: (2005) -
Plagiarism and fabulism: Dishonesty in the newsroom
por: Alan Samson
Publicado: (2005) -
INTRODUCTION: Media accountability
por: Claude-Jean Bertrand
Publicado: (2005) -
REVIEW: Ethics, integrity -but what about truth?
por: David Robie
Publicado: (2000) -
REVIEW: Quandry over contrasting ethics texts
por: Mark Pearson
Publicado: (2005)