Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism

For decades Soviet and later post-Soviet sociology was dominated by a cohort of scholars born between 1927–1930 (Grushin, Kon, Levada, Ossipov, Yadov, Zaslavskaya). The origins of their prominence and the character of their recognition offers a puzzle as it seemingly defies conventional ideas about...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Mikhail Sokolov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Royal Danish Library 2020
Materias:	history of sociology sociology of social sciences legitimacy soviet sociology sociology of secrecy Social Sciences H
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/602a8334428940a8b34f30059a13cbac
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:602a8334428940a8b34f30059a13cbac
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:602a8334428940a8b34f30059a13cbac2021-12-02T14:41:33ZFamous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism2521-094710.25364/11.2:2017.2.2https://doaj.org/article/602a8334428940a8b34f30059a13cbac2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/Serendipities/article/view/122712https://doaj.org/toc/2521-0947For decades Soviet and later post-Soviet sociology was dominated by a cohort of scholars born between 1927–1930 (Grushin, Kon, Levada, Ossipov, Yadov, Zaslavskaya). The origins of their prominence and the character of their recognition offers a puzzle as it seemingly defies conventional ideas about where academic renown comes from. Academic prominence is usually associated with either intellectual leadership or skillful manipulation of the academic power structures. Neither of these stories describes the peculiar pattern of recognition of the giants of Soviet sociology whose fame persisted after they retired from administrative responsibilities and in spite of their ideas from the Soviet era being almost forgotten. The hypothesis developed in this paper holds that this peculiar form of fame emerges from the unique position sociology held in Soviet society. The paper introduces a distinction between natural and intentional secrecy and argues that while most of Western sociology specialized in natural secrecy, Soviet sociology had to deal with intentional secrecy resulting from conscious attempts to conceal the dismal realities of state socialism. The pervasiveness of secrecy during the Soviet era resulted from the central legitimizing myth of Soviet society describing it as built following a scientifically devised plan. This legitimation allowed Soviet sociology to emerge and develop with an unparalleled speed, but, at the same time, it explains why sociology was seen as having considerable subversive potential and faced periodic repressions. This political environment accounts for Soviet sociology’s unique intellectual style as well as for the fact that its central figures remained in the disciplinary memory as heroic role models, rather than as authors of exemplary texts.Mikhail SokolovRoyal Danish Libraryarticlehistory of sociologysociology of social scienceslegitimacysoviet sociologysociology of secrecySocial SciencesHENSerendipities, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 183-211 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	history of sociology sociology of social sciences legitimacy soviet sociology sociology of secrecy Social Sciences H
spellingShingle	history of sociology sociology of social sciences legitimacy soviet sociology sociology of secrecy Social Sciences H Mikhail Sokolov Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism
description	For decades Soviet and later post-Soviet sociology was dominated by a cohort of scholars born between 1927–1930 (Grushin, Kon, Levada, Ossipov, Yadov, Zaslavskaya). The origins of their prominence and the character of their recognition offers a puzzle as it seemingly defies conventional ideas about where academic renown comes from. Academic prominence is usually associated with either intellectual leadership or skillful manipulation of the academic power structures. Neither of these stories describes the peculiar pattern of recognition of the giants of Soviet sociology whose fame persisted after they retired from administrative responsibilities and in spite of their ideas from the Soviet era being almost forgotten. The hypothesis developed in this paper holds that this peculiar form of fame emerges from the unique position sociology held in Soviet society. The paper introduces a distinction between natural and intentional secrecy and argues that while most of Western sociology specialized in natural secrecy, Soviet sociology had to deal with intentional secrecy resulting from conscious attempts to conceal the dismal realities of state socialism. The pervasiveness of secrecy during the Soviet era resulted from the central legitimizing myth of Soviet society describing it as built following a scientifically devised plan. This legitimation allowed Soviet sociology to emerge and develop with an unparalleled speed, but, at the same time, it explains why sociology was seen as having considerable subversive potential and faced periodic repressions. This political environment accounts for Soviet sociology’s unique intellectual style as well as for the fact that its central figures remained in the disciplinary memory as heroic role models, rather than as authors of exemplary texts.
format	article
author	Mikhail Sokolov
author_facet	Mikhail Sokolov
author_sort	Mikhail Sokolov
title	Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism
title_short	Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism
title_full	Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism
title_fullStr	Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism
title_full_unstemmed	Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism
title_sort	famous and forgotten: soviet sociology and the nature of intellectual achievement under totalitarianism
publisher	Royal Danish Library
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/602a8334428940a8b34f30059a13cbac
work_keys_str_mv	AT mikhailsokolov famousandforgottensovietsociologyandthenatureofintellectualachievementundertotalitarianism
_version_	1718389872727687168

Famous and Forgotten: Soviet Sociology and the Nature of Intellectual Achievement under Totalitarianism

Ejemplares similares