Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals

Aims. A glide path is created prior to root canal instrumentation by nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files to increase the efficiency and safety of cleaning and shaping. This study aimed to assess root canal transportation in use of different glide path files in curved canals. Materials and Methods. 3...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shiva Shojaeian, Niloofar Mortezapour, Fatemeh Soltaninejad, Nazanin Zargar, Babak Zandi, Yazdan Shantiaee, Amin Bidaki
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:	Dentistry RK1-715
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6066666e92f444c0830ef7c68925b3b5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6066666e92f444c0830ef7c68925b3b5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6066666e92f444c0830ef7c68925b3b52021-11-22T01:10:38ZComparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals1687-873610.1155/2021/4898684https://doaj.org/article/6066666e92f444c0830ef7c68925b3b52021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4898684https://doaj.org/toc/1687-8736Aims. A glide path is created prior to root canal instrumentation by nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files to increase the efficiency and safety of cleaning and shaping. This study aimed to assess root canal transportation in use of different glide path files in curved canals. Materials and Methods. 30 sound mesiobuccal root canals of mandibular molars with 20° to 40° curvature were selected and randomly assigned to 3 groups of EdgeGlidePath (EGP, EdgeEndo), One-G (Micro-Mega), and Neolix (Neoniti). The specimens were scanned before and after glide path creation by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). The pre- and postoperative micro-CT scans were superimposed, and the degree of canal transportation and centering ratio were measured at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm distances from the apical foramen. Statistical Analysis. The data were analyzed by two-way and one-way ANOVA. Results. The effects of distance from the apical foramen and instrument type and the interaction effect of the two were not significant on the centering ability of the files or canal transportation. Conclusion. EdgeGlidePath, One-G, and Neolix files fabricated from the conventional NiTi alloy or heat-treated M-Wire alloy showed similar performance regarding centering ability and canal transportation in glide path preparation in curved canals.Shiva ShojaeianNiloofar MortezapourFatemeh SoltaninejadNazanin ZargarBabak ZandiYazdan ShantiaeeAmin BidakiHindawi LimitedarticleDentistryRK1-715ENInternational Journal of Dentistry, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Dentistry RK1-715
spellingShingle	Dentistry RK1-715 Shiva Shojaeian Niloofar Mortezapour Fatemeh Soltaninejad Nazanin Zargar Babak Zandi Yazdan Shantiaee Amin Bidaki Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals
description	Aims. A glide path is created prior to root canal instrumentation by nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files to increase the efficiency and safety of cleaning and shaping. This study aimed to assess root canal transportation in use of different glide path files in curved canals. Materials and Methods. 30 sound mesiobuccal root canals of mandibular molars with 20° to 40° curvature were selected and randomly assigned to 3 groups of EdgeGlidePath (EGP, EdgeEndo), One-G (Micro-Mega), and Neolix (Neoniti). The specimens were scanned before and after glide path creation by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). The pre- and postoperative micro-CT scans were superimposed, and the degree of canal transportation and centering ratio were measured at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm distances from the apical foramen. Statistical Analysis. The data were analyzed by two-way and one-way ANOVA. Results. The effects of distance from the apical foramen and instrument type and the interaction effect of the two were not significant on the centering ability of the files or canal transportation. Conclusion. EdgeGlidePath, One-G, and Neolix files fabricated from the conventional NiTi alloy or heat-treated M-Wire alloy showed similar performance regarding centering ability and canal transportation in glide path preparation in curved canals.
format	article
author	Shiva Shojaeian Niloofar Mortezapour Fatemeh Soltaninejad Nazanin Zargar Babak Zandi Yazdan Shantiaee Amin Bidaki
author_facet	Shiva Shojaeian Niloofar Mortezapour Fatemeh Soltaninejad Nazanin Zargar Babak Zandi Yazdan Shantiaee Amin Bidaki
author_sort	Shiva Shojaeian
title	Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals
title_short	Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals
title_full	Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals
title_fullStr	Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals
title_sort	comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of one-g, edgeglidepath, and neolix: a microcomputed tomography study of curved root canals
publisher	Hindawi Limited
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/6066666e92f444c0830ef7c68925b3b5
work_keys_str_mv	AT shivashojaeian comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT niloofarmortezapour comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT fatemehsoltaninejad comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT nazaninzargar comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT babakzandi comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT yazdanshantiaee comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT aminbidaki comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals
_version_	1718418341052284928

Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals

Ejemplares similares