Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice

Introduction. This article describes how universities are fulfilling their training assignments. Its relevance is determined by the growing need of teachers to correlate the learning results of specialists-to-be with learning assignments. The aim of the article is to describe a method for assessing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aleksandr I. Bokarev, Еlena S. Denisova, Ivan A. Ignatovich, Aleksandr Yu. Kazakov
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: National Research Mordova State University 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/60836cf2185340c6bce3e9d72de64c9c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:60836cf2185340c6bce3e9d72de64c9c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:60836cf2185340c6bce3e9d72de64c9c2021-12-02T16:35:44ZAssessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice10.15507/1991-9468.102.025.202101.069-0901991-94682308-1058https://doaj.org/article/60836cf2185340c6bce3e9d72de64c9c2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://edumag.mrsu.ru/index.php/en/articles-en/101-21-1/875-10-15507-1991-9468-102-025-202101-4https://doaj.org/toc/1991-9468https://doaj.org/toc/2308-1058Introduction. This article describes how universities are fulfilling their training assignments. Its relevance is determined by the growing need of teachers to correlate the learning results of specialists-to-be with learning assignments. The aim of the article is to describe a method for assessing the learning management system of higher education institutions by analysing learning outcomes and graduates’ turn-out. Materials and Methods. The study relies on the collection and analysis of the results of specialists’ training between 2015 and 2019. The joint use of the obtained data and methods of normative forecasting and interpolation allowed the authors to calculate and measure the intermediate results relative to the final ones, to build educational trajectories, which made it possible to evaluate the learning management system by dealing with training results and graduates turn-out. Results. For the first time the authors of the article showed that the measured results demonstrated not only the scope of specialists’ training and graduation, but they evaluated management of the educational process and developed necessary management decisions to regulate standards and measures for specialists’ training and graduation according to the specified final results. Discussion and Conclusion. The conclusions contribute to the development of the concept of learning management systems, provided that there are specified final results of the specialists’ graduation. Findings are of interest to the scientific and pedagogical community, professors, teaching staff and leadership of educational institutions.Aleksandr I. BokarevЕlena S. DenisovaIvan A. IgnatovichAleksandr Yu. KazakovNational Research Mordova State Universityarticleeducational processthe task of training specialistseducational patha given rate of graduates’ turnoutoptimal and rational areas of managementEducationLRUИнтеграция образования, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 69-90 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic educational process
the task of training specialists
educational path
a given rate of graduates’ turnout
optimal and rational areas of management
Education
L
spellingShingle educational process
the task of training specialists
educational path
a given rate of graduates’ turnout
optimal and rational areas of management
Education
L
Aleksandr I. Bokarev
Еlena S. Denisova
Ivan A. Ignatovich
Aleksandr Yu. Kazakov
Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice
description Introduction. This article describes how universities are fulfilling their training assignments. Its relevance is determined by the growing need of teachers to correlate the learning results of specialists-to-be with learning assignments. The aim of the article is to describe a method for assessing the learning management system of higher education institutions by analysing learning outcomes and graduates’ turn-out. Materials and Methods. The study relies on the collection and analysis of the results of specialists’ training between 2015 and 2019. The joint use of the obtained data and methods of normative forecasting and interpolation allowed the authors to calculate and measure the intermediate results relative to the final ones, to build educational trajectories, which made it possible to evaluate the learning management system by dealing with training results and graduates turn-out. Results. For the first time the authors of the article showed that the measured results demonstrated not only the scope of specialists’ training and graduation, but they evaluated management of the educational process and developed necessary management decisions to regulate standards and measures for specialists’ training and graduation according to the specified final results. Discussion and Conclusion. The conclusions contribute to the development of the concept of learning management systems, provided that there are specified final results of the specialists’ graduation. Findings are of interest to the scientific and pedagogical community, professors, teaching staff and leadership of educational institutions.
format article
author Aleksandr I. Bokarev
Еlena S. Denisova
Ivan A. Ignatovich
Aleksandr Yu. Kazakov
author_facet Aleksandr I. Bokarev
Еlena S. Denisova
Ivan A. Ignatovich
Aleksandr Yu. Kazakov
author_sort Aleksandr I. Bokarev
title Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice
title_short Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice
title_full Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice
title_fullStr Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Learning Administration of Higher Education Institutions by Graduates’ Turn-Out and Learning Outcomes: Theory and Practice
title_sort assessing the learning administration of higher education institutions by graduates’ turn-out and learning outcomes: theory and practice
publisher National Research Mordova State University
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/60836cf2185340c6bce3e9d72de64c9c
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandribokarev assessingthelearningadministrationofhighereducationinstitutionsbygraduatesturnoutandlearningoutcomestheoryandpractice
AT elenasdenisova assessingthelearningadministrationofhighereducationinstitutionsbygraduatesturnoutandlearningoutcomestheoryandpractice
AT ivanaignatovich assessingthelearningadministrationofhighereducationinstitutionsbygraduatesturnoutandlearningoutcomestheoryandpractice
AT aleksandryukazakov assessingthelearningadministrationofhighereducationinstitutionsbygraduatesturnoutandlearningoutcomestheoryandpractice
_version_ 1718383691958321152