Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.

<h4>Background</h4>Placenta accreta/increta/percreta is associated with major pregnancy complications and is thought to be becoming more common. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK and to investigate and quantify the associ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kathryn E Fitzpatrick, Susan Sellers, Patsy Spark, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Peter Brocklehurst, Marian Knight
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/608b096a50b04dc88b42ae779a681441
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:608b096a50b04dc88b42ae779a681441
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:608b096a50b04dc88b42ae779a6814412021-11-18T08:03:26ZIncidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0052893https://doaj.org/article/608b096a50b04dc88b42ae779a6814412012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23300807/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Placenta accreta/increta/percreta is associated with major pregnancy complications and is thought to be becoming more common. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK and to investigate and quantify the associated risk factors.<h4>Methods</h4>A national case-control study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System was undertaken, including 134 women diagnosed with placenta accreta/increta/percreta between May 2010 and April 2011 and 256 control women.<h4>Results</h4>The estimated incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta was 1.7 per 10,000 maternities overall; 577 per 10,000 in women with both a previous caesarean delivery and placenta praevia. Women who had a previous caesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 14.41, 95%CI 5.63-36.85), other previous uterine surgery (aOR 3.40, 95%CI 1.30-8.91), an IVF pregnancy (aOR 32.13, 95%CI 2.03-509.23) and placenta praevia diagnosed antepartum (aOR 65.02, 95%CI 16.58-254.96) had raised odds of having placenta accreta/increta/percreta. There was also a raised odds of placenta accreta/increta/percreta associated with older maternal age in women without a previous caesarean delivery (aOR 1.30, 95%CI 1.13-1.50 for every one year increase in age).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Women with both a prior caesarean delivery and placenta praevia have a high incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta. There is a need to maintain a high index of suspicion of abnormal placental invasion in such women and preparations for delivery should be made accordingly.Kathryn E FitzpatrickSusan SellersPatsy SparkJennifer J KurinczukPeter BrocklehurstMarian KnightPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 12, p e52893 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kathryn E Fitzpatrick
Susan Sellers
Patsy Spark
Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Peter Brocklehurst
Marian Knight
Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.
description <h4>Background</h4>Placenta accreta/increta/percreta is associated with major pregnancy complications and is thought to be becoming more common. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK and to investigate and quantify the associated risk factors.<h4>Methods</h4>A national case-control study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System was undertaken, including 134 women diagnosed with placenta accreta/increta/percreta between May 2010 and April 2011 and 256 control women.<h4>Results</h4>The estimated incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta was 1.7 per 10,000 maternities overall; 577 per 10,000 in women with both a previous caesarean delivery and placenta praevia. Women who had a previous caesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 14.41, 95%CI 5.63-36.85), other previous uterine surgery (aOR 3.40, 95%CI 1.30-8.91), an IVF pregnancy (aOR 32.13, 95%CI 2.03-509.23) and placenta praevia diagnosed antepartum (aOR 65.02, 95%CI 16.58-254.96) had raised odds of having placenta accreta/increta/percreta. There was also a raised odds of placenta accreta/increta/percreta associated with older maternal age in women without a previous caesarean delivery (aOR 1.30, 95%CI 1.13-1.50 for every one year increase in age).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Women with both a prior caesarean delivery and placenta praevia have a high incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta. There is a need to maintain a high index of suspicion of abnormal placental invasion in such women and preparations for delivery should be made accordingly.
format article
author Kathryn E Fitzpatrick
Susan Sellers
Patsy Spark
Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Peter Brocklehurst
Marian Knight
author_facet Kathryn E Fitzpatrick
Susan Sellers
Patsy Spark
Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Peter Brocklehurst
Marian Knight
author_sort Kathryn E Fitzpatrick
title Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.
title_short Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.
title_full Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.
title_fullStr Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study.
title_sort incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the uk: a national case-control study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/608b096a50b04dc88b42ae779a681441
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrynefitzpatrick incidenceandriskfactorsforplacentaaccretaincretapercretaintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT susansellers incidenceandriskfactorsforplacentaaccretaincretapercretaintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT patsyspark incidenceandriskfactorsforplacentaaccretaincretapercretaintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT jenniferjkurinczuk incidenceandriskfactorsforplacentaaccretaincretapercretaintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT peterbrocklehurst incidenceandriskfactorsforplacentaaccretaincretapercretaintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
AT marianknight incidenceandriskfactorsforplacentaaccretaincretapercretaintheukanationalcasecontrolstudy
_version_ 1718422605826883584