Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’

Mises’s work of ‘Human action’ is analyzed in relation to the methodological conceptions of his predecessor C. Menger and of his successor F. von Hayek. Also, it is placed in the continuation of one of his previous works and in contrast to one that followed it. Some of his ideas can be better unders...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Alexandru A. POPOVICI
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR
Publicado:	Editura ASE Bucuresti 2018
Materias:	philosophy of economics Austrian School apriorism realism historism neopositivism Economics as a science HB71-74
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/609aafc324e44bf88668dc3006ac5dc5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:609aafc324e44bf88668dc3006ac5dc5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:609aafc324e44bf88668dc3006ac5dc52021-12-02T02:25:29ZCritical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’1843-22981844-8208https://doaj.org/article/609aafc324e44bf88668dc3006ac5dc52018-11-01T00:00:00Z https://www.jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=8078 https://doaj.org/toc/1843-2298https://doaj.org/toc/1844-8208Mises’s work of ‘Human action’ is analyzed in relation to the methodological conceptions of his predecessor C. Menger and of his successor F. von Hayek. Also, it is placed in the continuation of one of his previous works and in contrast to one that followed it. Some of his ideas can be better understood in such a way, while others show themselves as contradictory. It results that his attempt to combine apriorism with scientific realism explains some of major difficulties of Mises’s argumentation.Alexandru A. POPOVICIEditura ASE Bucurestiarticlephilosophy of economicsAustrian SchoolapriorismrealismhistorismneopositivismEconomics as a scienceHB71-74DEENFRJournal of Philosophical Economics, Vol XII, Iss 1, Pp 112-125 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR
topic	philosophy of economics Austrian School apriorism realism historism neopositivism Economics as a science HB71-74
spellingShingle	philosophy of economics Austrian School apriorism realism historism neopositivism Economics as a science HB71-74 Alexandru A. POPOVICI Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’
description	Mises’s work of ‘Human action’ is analyzed in relation to the methodological conceptions of his predecessor C. Menger and of his successor F. von Hayek. Also, it is placed in the continuation of one of his previous works and in contrast to one that followed it. Some of his ideas can be better understood in such a way, while others show themselves as contradictory. It results that his attempt to combine apriorism with scientific realism explains some of major difficulties of Mises’s argumentation.
format	article
author	Alexandru A. POPOVICI
author_facet	Alexandru A. POPOVICI
author_sort	Alexandru A. POPOVICI
title	Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’
title_short	Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’
title_full	Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’
title_fullStr	Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’
title_full_unstemmed	Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’
title_sort	critical comments on the philosophical context of ludwig von mises’s ‘human action’
publisher	Editura ASE Bucuresti
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/609aafc324e44bf88668dc3006ac5dc5
work_keys_str_mv	AT alexandruapopovici criticalcommentsonthephilosophicalcontextofludwigvonmisesshumanaction
_version_	1718402471561265152

Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’

Ejemplares similares