Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models
Abstract A comparative study is conducted to compare the theory and application effect of two accident causation models, the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and the accident causation “2-4” model (24Model), as well as to provide a reference for safety researchers and acciden...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/609d9970c3b24871b3e11302516ffaae |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:609d9970c3b24871b3e11302516ffaae |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:609d9970c3b24871b3e11302516ffaae2021-12-02T00:52:51ZComparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models10.1007/s12182-017-0171-41672-51071995-8226https://doaj.org/article/609d9970c3b24871b3e11302516ffaae2017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12182-017-0171-4https://doaj.org/toc/1672-5107https://doaj.org/toc/1995-8226Abstract A comparative study is conducted to compare the theory and application effect of two accident causation models, the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and the accident causation “2-4” model (24Model), as well as to provide a reference for safety researchers and accident investigators to select an appropriate accident analysis method. The two models are compared in terms of their theoretical foundations, cause classifications, accident analysis processes, application ranges, and accident prevention strategies. A coal and gas outburst accident is then analyzed using both models, and the application results are compared. This study shows that both the 24Model and HFACS have strong theoretical foundations, and they can each be applied in various domains. In addition, the cause classification in HFACS is more practical, and its accident analysis process is more convenient. On the other hand, the 24Model includes external factors, which makes the cause analysis more systematic and comprehensive. Moreover, the 24Model puts forward more corresponding measures to prevent accidents.Gui FuJia-Lin CaoLin ZhouYuan-Chi XiangKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.articleHFACSAccident causation “2-4” modelComparative studyUnsafe actsExternal causesCoal and gas outburst accidentScienceQPetrologyQE420-499ENPetroleum Science, Vol 14, Iss 3, Pp 570-578 (2017) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
HFACS Accident causation “2-4” model Comparative study Unsafe acts External causes Coal and gas outburst accident Science Q Petrology QE420-499 |
| spellingShingle |
HFACS Accident causation “2-4” model Comparative study Unsafe acts External causes Coal and gas outburst accident Science Q Petrology QE420-499 Gui Fu Jia-Lin Cao Lin Zhou Yuan-Chi Xiang Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models |
| description |
Abstract A comparative study is conducted to compare the theory and application effect of two accident causation models, the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and the accident causation “2-4” model (24Model), as well as to provide a reference for safety researchers and accident investigators to select an appropriate accident analysis method. The two models are compared in terms of their theoretical foundations, cause classifications, accident analysis processes, application ranges, and accident prevention strategies. A coal and gas outburst accident is then analyzed using both models, and the application results are compared. This study shows that both the 24Model and HFACS have strong theoretical foundations, and they can each be applied in various domains. In addition, the cause classification in HFACS is more practical, and its accident analysis process is more convenient. On the other hand, the 24Model includes external factors, which makes the cause analysis more systematic and comprehensive. Moreover, the 24Model puts forward more corresponding measures to prevent accidents. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Gui Fu Jia-Lin Cao Lin Zhou Yuan-Chi Xiang |
| author_facet |
Gui Fu Jia-Lin Cao Lin Zhou Yuan-Chi Xiang |
| author_sort |
Gui Fu |
| title |
Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models |
| title_short |
Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models |
| title_full |
Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models |
| title_fullStr |
Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models |
| title_sort |
comparative study of hfacs and the 24model accident causation models |
| publisher |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/609d9970c3b24871b3e11302516ffaae |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT guifu comparativestudyofhfacsandthe24modelaccidentcausationmodels AT jialincao comparativestudyofhfacsandthe24modelaccidentcausationmodels AT linzhou comparativestudyofhfacsandthe24modelaccidentcausationmodels AT yuanchixiang comparativestudyofhfacsandthe24modelaccidentcausationmodels |
| _version_ |
1718403441401790464 |