Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control

The article shows the evolution of the theoretical understanding of the “monitoring revolution”, including the difference between the ideas of “post-capitalism” as the aestheticization and fascization of reality, heterotopia and divid (F. Jameson, J. Deleuze, F. Guattari), as well as the ideas of “c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Yu. D. Artamonova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2020
Materias:	monitoring revolution big data social credit system platform capitalism data class orgnet characterless communication International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/60abcd71852e425b87ef913cde103d7c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:60abcd71852e425b87ef913cde103d7c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:60abcd71852e425b87ef913cde103d7c2021-11-07T14:45:04ZDigital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-2-7https://doaj.org/article/60abcd71852e425b87ef913cde103d7c2020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/621https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324The article shows the evolution of the theoretical understanding of the “monitoring revolution”, including the difference between the ideas of “post-capitalism” as the aestheticization and fascization of reality, heterotopia and divid (F. Jameson, J. Deleuze, F. Guattari), as well as the ideas of “cognitive capitalism” and modern concepts of “platform capitalism” (N. Srnicek, G. Lovink), “communicative capitalism” (S. Zizek, etc.). The article shows the fundamental differences between the monitoring model of the new digital society and the old Panopticon, primarily related to the formation of local and closed communities, the complexity of interaction between online and offline behavior and its assessments, the possibility of correcting the algorithm due to rapid changes in behavior patterns, as well as the ability of a person to “interact” consciously with the data collection and processing system for their own purposes. Two directions of digital monitoring are identified – “non-soft” and “soft” coer cion. In the first case, we are talking about the actual data collection and rewards for “doing the right things”, as in the version of the Chinese social credit system. The second is about creating a reality in which an individual can only act in a “set” way. It is emphasized that, contrary to forecasts, these systems do not develop along the path of “virtualization” of reality, which implies a conscious, though predetermined choice, but along the path of influencing the brain, bypassing the symbolic. Based on the analysis, the main directions of possible public control of monitoring procedures are identified. These are, first, the problems of “localization” of platforms (territorial and other “binding” of them) and the development of the concept of “citizen as user”; second, the differentiation of data classes to establish responsibility.Yu. D. ArtamonovaАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articlemonitoring revolutionbig datasocial credit systemplatform capitalismdata classorgnetcharacterless communicationInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 134-152 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	monitoring revolution big data social credit system platform capitalism data class orgnet characterless communication International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	monitoring revolution big data social credit system platform capitalism data class orgnet characterless communication International relations JZ2-6530 Yu. D. Artamonova Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control
description	The article shows the evolution of the theoretical understanding of the “monitoring revolution”, including the difference between the ideas of “post-capitalism” as the aestheticization and fascization of reality, heterotopia and divid (F. Jameson, J. Deleuze, F. Guattari), as well as the ideas of “cognitive capitalism” and modern concepts of “platform capitalism” (N. Srnicek, G. Lovink), “communicative capitalism” (S. Zizek, etc.). The article shows the fundamental differences between the monitoring model of the new digital society and the old Panopticon, primarily related to the formation of local and closed communities, the complexity of interaction between online and offline behavior and its assessments, the possibility of correcting the algorithm due to rapid changes in behavior patterns, as well as the ability of a person to “interact” consciously with the data collection and processing system for their own purposes. Two directions of digital monitoring are identified – “non-soft” and “soft” coer cion. In the first case, we are talking about the actual data collection and rewards for “doing the right things”, as in the version of the Chinese social credit system. The second is about creating a reality in which an individual can only act in a “set” way. It is emphasized that, contrary to forecasts, these systems do not develop along the path of “virtualization” of reality, which implies a conscious, though predetermined choice, but along the path of influencing the brain, bypassing the symbolic. Based on the analysis, the main directions of possible public control of monitoring procedures are identified. These are, first, the problems of “localization” of platforms (territorial and other “binding” of them) and the development of the concept of “citizen as user”; second, the differentiation of data classes to establish responsibility.
format	article
author	Yu. D. Artamonova
author_facet	Yu. D. Artamonova
author_sort	Yu. D. Artamonova
title	Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control
title_short	Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control
title_full	Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control
title_fullStr	Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control
title_full_unstemmed	Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control
title_sort	digital monitoring of socio-political life: main directions of development and opportunities for public control
publisher	Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/60abcd71852e425b87ef913cde103d7c
work_keys_str_mv	AT yudartamonova digitalmonitoringofsociopoliticallifemaindirectionsofdevelopmentandopportunitiesforpubliccontrol
_version_	1718443354065207296

Digital Monitoring of Socio-political Life: Main Directions of Development and Opportunities for Public Control

Ejemplares similares