The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, David Moher
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009
Materias:	Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/60caf9425e7348e299a11c2310d3581c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:60caf9425e7348e299a11c2310d3581c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:60caf9425e7348e299a11c2310d3581c2021-11-25T05:37:35ZThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1000100https://doaj.org/article/60caf9425e7348e299a11c2310d3581c2009-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19621070/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users.Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions.The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Alessandro LiberatiDouglas G AltmanJennifer TetzlaffCynthia MulrowPeter C GøtzscheJohn P A IoannidisMike ClarkeP J DevereauxJos KleijnenDavid MoherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 6, Iss 7, p e1000100 (2009)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R
spellingShingle	Medicine R Alessandro Liberati Douglas G Altman Jennifer Tetzlaff Cynthia Mulrow Peter C Gøtzsche John P A Ioannidis Mike Clarke P J Devereaux Jos Kleijnen David Moher The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
description	Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users.Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions.The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
format	article
author	Alessandro Liberati Douglas G Altman Jennifer Tetzlaff Cynthia Mulrow Peter C Gøtzsche John P A Ioannidis Mike Clarke P J Devereaux Jos Kleijnen David Moher
author_facet	Alessandro Liberati Douglas G Altman Jennifer Tetzlaff Cynthia Mulrow Peter C Gøtzsche John P A Ioannidis Mike Clarke P J Devereaux Jos Kleijnen David Moher
author_sort	Alessandro Liberati
title	The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_short	The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_full	The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_fullStr	The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_full_unstemmed	The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
title_sort	prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2009
url	https://doaj.org/article/60caf9425e7348e299a11c2310d3581c
work_keys_str_mv	AT alessandroliberati theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT douglasgaltman theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT jennifertetzlaff theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT cynthiamulrow theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT petercgøtzsche theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT johnpaioannidis theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT mikeclarke theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT pjdevereaux theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT joskleijnen theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT davidmoher theprismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT alessandroliberati prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT douglasgaltman prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT jennifertetzlaff prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT cynthiamulrow prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT petercgøtzsche prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT johnpaioannidis prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT mikeclarke prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT pjdevereaux prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT joskleijnen prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration AT davidmoher prismastatementforreportingsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsexplanationandelaboration
_version_	1718414580357529600

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Ejemplares similares