Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot

Abstract Work on curved tracks, e.g. on circles, is commonplace within all forms of horse training. Horse movements in circles are naturally asymmetric, including the load distribution between inner and outer limbs. Within equestrian dressage the horse is expected to bend the back laterally to follo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: A. Byström, A. M. Hardeman, F. M. Serra Bragança, L. Roepstorff, J. H. Swagemakers, P. R. van Weeren, A. Egenvall
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/612c4a9e4dd3494299d06dd7388f62b4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:612c4a9e4dd3494299d06dd7388f62b4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:612c4a9e4dd3494299d06dd7388f62b42021-12-02T17:41:07ZDifferences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot10.1038/s41598-021-92272-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/612c4a9e4dd3494299d06dd7388f62b42021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92272-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Work on curved tracks, e.g. on circles, is commonplace within all forms of horse training. Horse movements in circles are naturally asymmetric, including the load distribution between inner and outer limbs. Within equestrian dressage the horse is expected to bend the back laterally to follow the circle, but this has never been studied scientifically. In the current study 12 horses were measured (optical motion capture, 100 Hz) trotting on left and right circles and on the straight without rider (soft surface). Data from markers placed along the spine indicated increased lateral bending to the inside (e.g. left bending on the left circle) of the thoracolumbar back (difference left circle vs. straight − 3.75°; right circle + 3.61°) and the neck (left − 5.23°; right + 4.80° vs. straight). Lateral bending ROM increased on the circle (+ 0.87° and + 0.62°). Individual variation in straight-circle differences was evident, but each horse was generally consistent over multiple trials. Differences in back movements between circle and straight were generally small and may or may not be visible, but accompanying changes in muscle activity and limb movements may add to the visual impression.A. ByströmA. M. HardemanF. M. Serra BragançaL. RoepstorffJ. H. SwagemakersP. R. van WeerenA. EgenvallNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
A. Byström
A. M. Hardeman
F. M. Serra Bragança
L. Roepstorff
J. H. Swagemakers
P. R. van Weeren
A. Egenvall
Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot
description Abstract Work on curved tracks, e.g. on circles, is commonplace within all forms of horse training. Horse movements in circles are naturally asymmetric, including the load distribution between inner and outer limbs. Within equestrian dressage the horse is expected to bend the back laterally to follow the circle, but this has never been studied scientifically. In the current study 12 horses were measured (optical motion capture, 100 Hz) trotting on left and right circles and on the straight without rider (soft surface). Data from markers placed along the spine indicated increased lateral bending to the inside (e.g. left bending on the left circle) of the thoracolumbar back (difference left circle vs. straight − 3.75°; right circle + 3.61°) and the neck (left − 5.23°; right + 4.80° vs. straight). Lateral bending ROM increased on the circle (+ 0.87° and + 0.62°). Individual variation in straight-circle differences was evident, but each horse was generally consistent over multiple trials. Differences in back movements between circle and straight were generally small and may or may not be visible, but accompanying changes in muscle activity and limb movements may add to the visual impression.
format article
author A. Byström
A. M. Hardeman
F. M. Serra Bragança
L. Roepstorff
J. H. Swagemakers
P. R. van Weeren
A. Egenvall
author_facet A. Byström
A. M. Hardeman
F. M. Serra Bragança
L. Roepstorff
J. H. Swagemakers
P. R. van Weeren
A. Egenvall
author_sort A. Byström
title Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot
title_short Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot
title_full Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot
title_fullStr Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot
title_full_unstemmed Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot
title_sort differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/612c4a9e4dd3494299d06dd7388f62b4
work_keys_str_mv AT abystrom differencesinequinespinalkinematicsbetweenstraightlineandcircleintrot
AT amhardeman differencesinequinespinalkinematicsbetweenstraightlineandcircleintrot
AT fmserrabraganca differencesinequinespinalkinematicsbetweenstraightlineandcircleintrot
AT lroepstorff differencesinequinespinalkinematicsbetweenstraightlineandcircleintrot
AT jhswagemakers differencesinequinespinalkinematicsbetweenstraightlineandcircleintrot
AT prvanweeren differencesinequinespinalkinematicsbetweenstraightlineandcircleintrot
AT aegenvall differencesinequinespinalkinematicsbetweenstraightlineandcircleintrot
_version_ 1718379708392931328