The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.

The Stroop and stop-signal tasks are commonly used to index prepotent response inhibition in studies of cognitive development and individual differences. Inhibitory measures from the two tasks have been derived using a variety of methods. Findings of low inter-correlations amongst these measures hav...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kiat Hui Khng, Kerry Lee
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/6130f000c0bf458eba748bf4a0b44ba0
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:6130f000c0bf458eba748bf4a0b44ba0
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:6130f000c0bf458eba748bf4a0b44ba02021-11-25T06:09:38ZThe relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0101356https://doaj.org/article/6130f000c0bf458eba748bf4a0b44ba02014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24992683/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The Stroop and stop-signal tasks are commonly used to index prepotent response inhibition in studies of cognitive development and individual differences. Inhibitory measures from the two tasks have been derived using a variety of methods. Findings of low inter-correlations amongst these measures have been interpreted as evidence for different kinds of inhibitory functions. Our previous study found Stroop and stop-signal accuracy measures to be uncorrelated and they loaded on different inhibitory components in a principal component analysis. The present study examined whether this finding is replicated across different task contexts, derived measures, and methods of derivation. Adolescents (N = 247) were administered a number-quantity Stroop and word and number stop-signal tasks. For each stop-signal task, inhibitory efficiency was estimated using a stop-signal reaction time measure estimated with the central versus the integration methods. For the Stroop interference task, inhibitory efficiency was indexed by reaction time measures (including inverse efficiency scores) generated from difference scores and regression residuals, and delta-plot slopes. The reaction time measures from the two tasks were generally not correlated. The only exception was that Stroop inhibitory ability, indexed by Stroop errors, was related to stop-signal inhibitory efficiency, indexed by stop-signal reaction time. These findings are consistent with previous findings suggesting that measures from the Stroop and stop-signal tasks are influenced by different underlying processes. The impact of variations in dependent measure derivation on the resulting reliabilities of Stroop and stop-signal measures and on observed correlations between them were examined. Variables that may have contributed to the null findings are discussed.Kiat Hui KhngKerry LeePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 7, p e101356 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Kiat Hui Khng Kerry Lee The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
description	The Stroop and stop-signal tasks are commonly used to index prepotent response inhibition in studies of cognitive development and individual differences. Inhibitory measures from the two tasks have been derived using a variety of methods. Findings of low inter-correlations amongst these measures have been interpreted as evidence for different kinds of inhibitory functions. Our previous study found Stroop and stop-signal accuracy measures to be uncorrelated and they loaded on different inhibitory components in a principal component analysis. The present study examined whether this finding is replicated across different task contexts, derived measures, and methods of derivation. Adolescents (N = 247) were administered a number-quantity Stroop and word and number stop-signal tasks. For each stop-signal task, inhibitory efficiency was estimated using a stop-signal reaction time measure estimated with the central versus the integration methods. For the Stroop interference task, inhibitory efficiency was indexed by reaction time measures (including inverse efficiency scores) generated from difference scores and regression residuals, and delta-plot slopes. The reaction time measures from the two tasks were generally not correlated. The only exception was that Stroop inhibitory ability, indexed by Stroop errors, was related to stop-signal inhibitory efficiency, indexed by stop-signal reaction time. These findings are consistent with previous findings suggesting that measures from the Stroop and stop-signal tasks are influenced by different underlying processes. The impact of variations in dependent measure derivation on the resulting reliabilities of Stroop and stop-signal measures and on observed correlations between them were examined. Variables that may have contributed to the null findings are discussed.
format	article
author	Kiat Hui Khng Kerry Lee
author_facet	Kiat Hui Khng Kerry Lee
author_sort	Kiat Hui Khng
title	The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
title_short	The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
title_full	The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
title_fullStr	The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
title_full_unstemmed	The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
title_sort	relationship between stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/6130f000c0bf458eba748bf4a0b44ba0
work_keys_str_mv	AT kiathuikhng therelationshipbetweenstroopandstopsignalmeasuresofinhibitioninadolescentsinfluencesfromvariationsincontextandmeasureestimation AT kerrylee therelationshipbetweenstroopandstopsignalmeasuresofinhibitioninadolescentsinfluencesfromvariationsincontextandmeasureestimation AT kiathuikhng relationshipbetweenstroopandstopsignalmeasuresofinhibitioninadolescentsinfluencesfromvariationsincontextandmeasureestimation AT kerrylee relationshipbetweenstroopandstopsignalmeasuresofinhibitioninadolescentsinfluencesfromvariationsincontextandmeasureestimation
_version_	1718414104391057408

The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.

Ejemplares similares