Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?

Abstract Background Although the incidence of myocardial bridge (MB) has been defined in different femoral access conventional coronary angiography (FACCA) studies, the frequency of MB on radial access coronary angiography (RACA) is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the difference in t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Oktay Şenöz, Zeynep Yapan Emren
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	BMC 2021
Materias:	Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/613dd5bf078340ae97fe689435a54516
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:613dd5bf078340ae97fe689435a54516
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:613dd5bf078340ae97fe689435a545162021-11-28T12:05:20ZIs myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?10.1186/s12872-021-02382-y1471-2261https://doaj.org/article/613dd5bf078340ae97fe689435a545162021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02382-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/1471-2261Abstract Background Although the incidence of myocardial bridge (MB) has been defined in different femoral access conventional coronary angiography (FACCA) studies, the frequency of MB on radial access coronary angiography (RACA) is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the difference in the incidence of MB between patients undergoing RACA and FACCA. Method A total of 2500 consecutive patients who underwent RACA and a total of 1455 consecutive patients who underwent FACCA were retrospectively investigated to detect the presence of MB. The incidences of the groups were calculated separately and compared. The clinical and angiographic features of the patients with MB were analyzed. Results MB was detected at an incidence of 10.2%, in 255/2500 patients who underwent RACA, and 1.8% in 27/1455 patients who underwent FACCA (p < 0.001). In both RACA and FACCA patients, the most involved coronary artery was the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (86.9% and 93.1%) and the mid-segment (84.9% and 88.9%) was the most affected section. Co-involvement of multiple coronary arteries by MB was 7.8% in patients who underwent RACA and 7.4% in patients who underwent FACCA. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined in 111 (35.7%) of the coronary arteries with MB, of which 81.9% were proximal to the MB. No significant CAD was detected in any of the vessels of 69.8% (178/255) of the patients who underwent RACA for different clinical indications. Conclusion These data demonstrated that the incidence of myocardial bridge able to be detected on RACA was much higher than FACCA.Oktay ŞenözZeynep Yapan EmrenBMCarticleDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENBMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701
spellingShingle	Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 Oktay Şenöz Zeynep Yapan Emren Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
description	Abstract Background Although the incidence of myocardial bridge (MB) has been defined in different femoral access conventional coronary angiography (FACCA) studies, the frequency of MB on radial access coronary angiography (RACA) is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the difference in the incidence of MB between patients undergoing RACA and FACCA. Method A total of 2500 consecutive patients who underwent RACA and a total of 1455 consecutive patients who underwent FACCA were retrospectively investigated to detect the presence of MB. The incidences of the groups were calculated separately and compared. The clinical and angiographic features of the patients with MB were analyzed. Results MB was detected at an incidence of 10.2%, in 255/2500 patients who underwent RACA, and 1.8% in 27/1455 patients who underwent FACCA (p < 0.001). In both RACA and FACCA patients, the most involved coronary artery was the left anterior descending artery (LAD) (86.9% and 93.1%) and the mid-segment (84.9% and 88.9%) was the most affected section. Co-involvement of multiple coronary arteries by MB was 7.8% in patients who underwent RACA and 7.4% in patients who underwent FACCA. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined in 111 (35.7%) of the coronary arteries with MB, of which 81.9% were proximal to the MB. No significant CAD was detected in any of the vessels of 69.8% (178/255) of the patients who underwent RACA for different clinical indications. Conclusion These data demonstrated that the incidence of myocardial bridge able to be detected on RACA was much higher than FACCA.
format	article
author	Oktay Şenöz Zeynep Yapan Emren
author_facet	Oktay Şenöz Zeynep Yapan Emren
author_sort	Oktay Şenöz
title	Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_short	Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_full	Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_fullStr	Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_full_unstemmed	Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
title_sort	is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
publisher	BMC
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/613dd5bf078340ae97fe689435a54516
work_keys_str_mv	AT oktaysenoz ismyocardialbridgemorefrequentlydetectedonradialaccesscoronaryangiography AT zeynepyapanemren ismyocardialbridgemorefrequentlydetectedonradialaccesscoronaryangiography
_version_	1718408200122793984

Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?

Ejemplares similares