Adverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies

Juvenile perpetrators account for over 25% of all sexual offenses, and over one-third of such offenses are against victims under the age of 18. Given empirical connections between adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure and perpetration of violence, we create victim typologies based on the juven...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael T. Baglivio, Kevin T. Wolff
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/6147362456fb4bffbd2d89f75f6e5a4e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:6147362456fb4bffbd2d89f75f6e5a4e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:6147362456fb4bffbd2d89f75f6e5a4e2021-11-11T16:28:45ZAdverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies10.3390/ijerph1821113451660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/6147362456fb4bffbd2d89f75f6e5a4e2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11345https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Juvenile perpetrators account for over 25% of all sexual offenses, and over one-third of such offenses are against victims under the age of 18. Given empirical connections between adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure and perpetration of violence, we create victim typologies based on the juveniles’ relationship to their victims among 5539 justice-involved adolescents who have committed violent against-person sexual felonies. Multinomial logistic regression is used to assess which covariates, including individual ACE exposures and cumulative traumatic exposures, are associated with victim typologies. This approach allows for better targeting of violence prevention efforts, as a more nuanced understanding of the increased likelihood to victimize specific victim groups lends to potential differences in treatment provision, beyond simplistic findings regarding ACE exposure increasing offending. Results indicate five classes of victim types, ranging from a low of 6.4%, with primarily strangers as victims, to 31.3%, with predominately acquaintances as victims, and only 12.9% with a diverse array of relationships to victims. Importantly, many demographic and individual risk factors, and specific traumatic exposures were related to victimizing one’s sibling, while cumulative trauma as measured by an ACE score decreased the likelihood of victimizing classmates, while increasing the likelihood of victimizing siblings and other relatives compared to victimizing acquaintances.Michael T. BaglivioKevin T. WolffMDPI AGarticleadverse childhood experiences (ACE)victim typologiesviolent juvenile sexual offendinglatent class analysisvictim–offender relationshipMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11345, p 11345 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic adverse childhood experiences (ACE)
victim typologies
violent juvenile sexual offending
latent class analysis
victim–offender relationship
Medicine
R
spellingShingle adverse childhood experiences (ACE)
victim typologies
violent juvenile sexual offending
latent class analysis
victim–offender relationship
Medicine
R
Michael T. Baglivio
Kevin T. Wolff
Adverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies
description Juvenile perpetrators account for over 25% of all sexual offenses, and over one-third of such offenses are against victims under the age of 18. Given empirical connections between adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure and perpetration of violence, we create victim typologies based on the juveniles’ relationship to their victims among 5539 justice-involved adolescents who have committed violent against-person sexual felonies. Multinomial logistic regression is used to assess which covariates, including individual ACE exposures and cumulative traumatic exposures, are associated with victim typologies. This approach allows for better targeting of violence prevention efforts, as a more nuanced understanding of the increased likelihood to victimize specific victim groups lends to potential differences in treatment provision, beyond simplistic findings regarding ACE exposure increasing offending. Results indicate five classes of victim types, ranging from a low of 6.4%, with primarily strangers as victims, to 31.3%, with predominately acquaintances as victims, and only 12.9% with a diverse array of relationships to victims. Importantly, many demographic and individual risk factors, and specific traumatic exposures were related to victimizing one’s sibling, while cumulative trauma as measured by an ACE score decreased the likelihood of victimizing classmates, while increasing the likelihood of victimizing siblings and other relatives compared to victimizing acquaintances.
format article
author Michael T. Baglivio
Kevin T. Wolff
author_facet Michael T. Baglivio
Kevin T. Wolff
author_sort Michael T. Baglivio
title Adverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies
title_short Adverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies
title_full Adverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies
title_fullStr Adverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies
title_full_unstemmed Adverse Childhood Experiences Distinguish Violent Juvenile Sexual Offenders’ Victim Typologies
title_sort adverse childhood experiences distinguish violent juvenile sexual offenders’ victim typologies
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/6147362456fb4bffbd2d89f75f6e5a4e
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeltbaglivio adversechildhoodexperiencesdistinguishviolentjuvenilesexualoffendersvictimtypologies
AT kevintwolff adversechildhoodexperiencesdistinguishviolentjuvenilesexualoffendersvictimtypologies
_version_ 1718432298951507968