Contribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress

The gradient nanostructured (GNS) layer forms beneath the surface of Zr-4 samples by the surface mechanical grinding treatment (SMGT) process, which increases the fatigue strength apparently due to the synergistic effect of the gradient nanostructured layer and compressive residual stress. The SMGTe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donghui Geng, Qiaoyan Sun, Chao Xin, Lin Xiao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/61a4006f43f84d07a503d5e60e027fed
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:61a4006f43f84d07a503d5e60e027fed
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:61a4006f43f84d07a503d5e60e027fed2021-11-25T18:32:39ZContribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress10.3390/nano111131252079-4991https://doaj.org/article/61a4006f43f84d07a503d5e60e027fed2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/11/3125https://doaj.org/toc/2079-4991The gradient nanostructured (GNS) layer forms beneath the surface of Zr-4 samples by the surface mechanical grinding treatment (SMGT) process, which increases the fatigue strength apparently due to the synergistic effect of the gradient nanostructured layer and compressive residual stress. The SMGTed Zr-4 samples are subjected to annealing to remove residual stress (A-SMGT) and the individual effect of the GNS layer and compressive residual stress can be clarified. The results show that the gradient nanostructure in the surface is stable after annealing at 400 °C for 2 h but residual stress is apparently removed. Both SMGTed and A-SMGTed Zr-4 samples exhibit higher fatigue strength than that of coarse-grained (CG) Zr-4 alloy. The fatigue fracture of Zr-4 alloy indicates that the hard GNS surface layer hinders fatigue cracks from approaching the surface and leads to a lower fatigue striation space than that of CG Zr-4 samples. The offset fatigue strength of 10<sup>6</sup> cycles is taken for SMRT-ed, A-SMRT-ed, and CG Zr-4 samples and the results indicate clearly that the GNS surface layer is a key factor for the improvement of fatigue strength of the Zr-4 alloy with surface mechanical grinding treatment.Donghui GengQiaoyan SunChao XinLin XiaoMDPI AGarticlegradient nanostructured surface layercompressive residual stressZr-4 alloyfatigue propertiesChemistryQD1-999ENNanomaterials, Vol 11, Iss 3125, p 3125 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic gradient nanostructured surface layer
compressive residual stress
Zr-4 alloy
fatigue properties
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle gradient nanostructured surface layer
compressive residual stress
Zr-4 alloy
fatigue properties
Chemistry
QD1-999
Donghui Geng
Qiaoyan Sun
Chao Xin
Lin Xiao
Contribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress
description The gradient nanostructured (GNS) layer forms beneath the surface of Zr-4 samples by the surface mechanical grinding treatment (SMGT) process, which increases the fatigue strength apparently due to the synergistic effect of the gradient nanostructured layer and compressive residual stress. The SMGTed Zr-4 samples are subjected to annealing to remove residual stress (A-SMGT) and the individual effect of the GNS layer and compressive residual stress can be clarified. The results show that the gradient nanostructure in the surface is stable after annealing at 400 °C for 2 h but residual stress is apparently removed. Both SMGTed and A-SMGTed Zr-4 samples exhibit higher fatigue strength than that of coarse-grained (CG) Zr-4 alloy. The fatigue fracture of Zr-4 alloy indicates that the hard GNS surface layer hinders fatigue cracks from approaching the surface and leads to a lower fatigue striation space than that of CG Zr-4 samples. The offset fatigue strength of 10<sup>6</sup> cycles is taken for SMRT-ed, A-SMRT-ed, and CG Zr-4 samples and the results indicate clearly that the GNS surface layer is a key factor for the improvement of fatigue strength of the Zr-4 alloy with surface mechanical grinding treatment.
format article
author Donghui Geng
Qiaoyan Sun
Chao Xin
Lin Xiao
author_facet Donghui Geng
Qiaoyan Sun
Chao Xin
Lin Xiao
author_sort Donghui Geng
title Contribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress
title_short Contribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress
title_full Contribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress
title_fullStr Contribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress
title_full_unstemmed Contribution to Improvement of Fatigue Properties of Zr-4 Alloy: Gradient Nanostructured Surface Layer versus Compressive Residual Stress
title_sort contribution to improvement of fatigue properties of zr-4 alloy: gradient nanostructured surface layer versus compressive residual stress
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/61a4006f43f84d07a503d5e60e027fed
work_keys_str_mv AT donghuigeng contributiontoimprovementoffatiguepropertiesofzr4alloygradientnanostructuredsurfacelayerversuscompressiveresidualstress
AT qiaoyansun contributiontoimprovementoffatiguepropertiesofzr4alloygradientnanostructuredsurfacelayerversuscompressiveresidualstress
AT chaoxin contributiontoimprovementoffatiguepropertiesofzr4alloygradientnanostructuredsurfacelayerversuscompressiveresidualstress
AT linxiao contributiontoimprovementoffatiguepropertiesofzr4alloygradientnanostructuredsurfacelayerversuscompressiveresidualstress
_version_ 1718411019717443584