Identifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy

As the adoption of open educational resources (OER) continues to increase, instructors have started using these resources for more than simply delivering content. Open pedagogy is a term used to describe a range of instructional practices that often incorporate OER into the learning process. This st...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John Hilton, Bryson Hilton, Tarah K. Ikahihifo, Reta Chaffee, Jennifer Darrow, JoAnn Guilmett, David Wiley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2020
Materias:
OER
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/61a99c171a76449fb08897d4c319c273
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:61a99c171a76449fb08897d4c319c273
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:61a99c171a76449fb08897d4c319c2732021-12-02T19:25:57ZIdentifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.48951492-3831https://doaj.org/article/61a99c171a76449fb08897d4c319c2732020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/4895https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831As the adoption of open educational resources (OER) continues to increase, instructors have started using these resources for more than simply delivering content. Open pedagogy is a term used to describe a range of instructional practices that often incorporate OER into the learning process. This study examined student perceptions of two approaches to open pedagogy—student creation of multiple-choice questions and student creation of the syllabus and corresponding course assignments. The sample included responses from 84 students at two colleges in the United States. Results showed that students who created the syllabus and assignments had a more positive experience and were more likely to enroll in a future course that implements this strategy. Those in the multiple-choice course felt that the approach was less conducive to learning than traditional learning activities. The significant differences in student feedback on two different approaches, both of which could be termed open pedagogy, indicate that more research is needed to examine the efficacy of the wide variety of approaches to open pedagogy. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of one instantiation of open pedagogy does not equal the effectiveness of open pedagogy, broadly defined. John HiltonBryson HiltonTarah K. IkahihifoReta Chaffee Jennifer Darrow JoAnn Guilmett David WileyAthabasca University Pressarticleopen educational resourcesOERopen pedagogyOER-enabled pedagogySpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 21, Iss 4 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic open educational resources
OER
open pedagogy
OER-enabled pedagogy
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle open educational resources
OER
open pedagogy
OER-enabled pedagogy
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
John Hilton
Bryson Hilton
Tarah K. Ikahihifo
Reta Chaffee
Jennifer Darrow
JoAnn Guilmett
David Wiley
Identifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy
description As the adoption of open educational resources (OER) continues to increase, instructors have started using these resources for more than simply delivering content. Open pedagogy is a term used to describe a range of instructional practices that often incorporate OER into the learning process. This study examined student perceptions of two approaches to open pedagogy—student creation of multiple-choice questions and student creation of the syllabus and corresponding course assignments. The sample included responses from 84 students at two colleges in the United States. Results showed that students who created the syllabus and assignments had a more positive experience and were more likely to enroll in a future course that implements this strategy. Those in the multiple-choice course felt that the approach was less conducive to learning than traditional learning activities. The significant differences in student feedback on two different approaches, both of which could be termed open pedagogy, indicate that more research is needed to examine the efficacy of the wide variety of approaches to open pedagogy. Moreover, the perceived efficacy of one instantiation of open pedagogy does not equal the effectiveness of open pedagogy, broadly defined.
format article
author John Hilton
Bryson Hilton
Tarah K. Ikahihifo
Reta Chaffee
Jennifer Darrow
JoAnn Guilmett
David Wiley
author_facet John Hilton
Bryson Hilton
Tarah K. Ikahihifo
Reta Chaffee
Jennifer Darrow
JoAnn Guilmett
David Wiley
author_sort John Hilton
title Identifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy
title_short Identifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy
title_full Identifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy
title_fullStr Identifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Student Perceptions of Different Instantiations of Open Pedagogy
title_sort identifying student perceptions of different instantiations of open pedagogy
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/61a99c171a76449fb08897d4c319c273
work_keys_str_mv AT johnhilton identifyingstudentperceptionsofdifferentinstantiationsofopenpedagogy
AT brysonhilton identifyingstudentperceptionsofdifferentinstantiationsofopenpedagogy
AT tarahkikahihifo identifyingstudentperceptionsofdifferentinstantiationsofopenpedagogy
AT retachaffee identifyingstudentperceptionsofdifferentinstantiationsofopenpedagogy
AT jenniferdarrow identifyingstudentperceptionsofdifferentinstantiationsofopenpedagogy
AT joannguilmett identifyingstudentperceptionsofdifferentinstantiationsofopenpedagogy
AT davidwiley identifyingstudentperceptionsofdifferentinstantiationsofopenpedagogy
_version_ 1718376561747427328