Risk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture

Background Subclinical infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is a common condition and increases the risk of clinical infection. However, there are limited studies focused on risk stratifying and prognostic analysis of subclinical CIED infection. Methods and Results Data from 4...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaofeng Lin, Tong Zou, Min Dong, Junpeng Liu, Wen Cui, Jiabin Tong, Haifeng Shi, Hao Chen, Jia Chong, You Lyu, Sujuan Wu, Zhilei Wang, Xin Jin, Xu Gao, Lin Sun, Yimei Qu, Jiefu Yang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/61d11fe4de4d434ca65e8deb1cde1a52
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:61d11fe4de4d434ca65e8deb1cde1a52
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:61d11fe4de4d434ca65e8deb1cde1a522021-11-16T10:22:43ZRisk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture10.1161/JAHA.121.0222602047-9980https://doaj.org/article/61d11fe4de4d434ca65e8deb1cde1a522021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.022260https://doaj.org/toc/2047-9980Background Subclinical infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is a common condition and increases the risk of clinical infection. However, there are limited studies focused on risk stratifying and prognostic analysis of subclinical CIED infection. Methods and Results Data from 418 consecutive patients undergoing CIED replacement or upgrade between January 2011 and December 2019 were used in the analysis. Among the patients included, 50 (12.0%) were detected as positive by bacterial culture of pocket tissues. The most frequently isolated bacteria were coagulase‐negative staphylococci (76.9%). Compared with the noninfection group, more patients in the subclinical infection group were taking immunosuppressive agents, received electrode replacement, or received CIED upgrade and temporary pacing. Patients in the subclinical infection group had a higher PADIT (Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial) score. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis found that use of immunosuppressive agents (odds ratio [OR], 6.95 [95% CI, 1.44–33.51]; P=0.02) and electrode replacement or CIED upgrade (OR, 6.73 [95% CI, 2.23–20.38]; P=0.001) were significantly associated with subclinical CIED infection. Meanwhile, compared with the low‐risk group, patients in the intermediate/high‐risk group had a higher risk of subclinical CIED infection (OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 1.58–7.41]; P=0.002). After a median follow‐up time of 36.5 months, the end points between the subclinical infection group and noninfection group were as follows: composite events (58.0% versus 41.8%, P=0.03), rehospitalization (54.0% versus 32.1%, P=0.002), cardiovascular rehospitalization (32.0% versus 13.9%, P=0.001), CIED infection (2.0% versus 0.5%, P=0.32), all‐cause mortality (28.0% versus 21.5%, P=0.30), and cardiovascular mortality (10.0% versus 7.6%, P=0.57). Conclusions Subclinical CIED infection was a common phenomenon. The PADIT score had significant value for stratifying patients at high risk of subclinical CIED infection. Subclinical CIED infection was associated with increased risks of composite events, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular rehospitalization.Gaofeng LinTong ZouMin DongJunpeng LiuWen CuiJiabin TongHaifeng ShiHao ChenJia ChongYou LyuSujuan WuZhilei WangXin JinXu GaoLin SunYimei QuJiefu YangWileyarticlebacterial culturecardiac implantable electronic devicesprognosisrisk stratifyingsubclinical infectionDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, Vol 10, Iss 22 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bacterial culture
cardiac implantable electronic devices
prognosis
risk stratifying
subclinical infection
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle bacterial culture
cardiac implantable electronic devices
prognosis
risk stratifying
subclinical infection
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Gaofeng Lin
Tong Zou
Min Dong
Junpeng Liu
Wen Cui
Jiabin Tong
Haifeng Shi
Hao Chen
Jia Chong
You Lyu
Sujuan Wu
Zhilei Wang
Xin Jin
Xu Gao
Lin Sun
Yimei Qu
Jiefu Yang
Risk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture
description Background Subclinical infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is a common condition and increases the risk of clinical infection. However, there are limited studies focused on risk stratifying and prognostic analysis of subclinical CIED infection. Methods and Results Data from 418 consecutive patients undergoing CIED replacement or upgrade between January 2011 and December 2019 were used in the analysis. Among the patients included, 50 (12.0%) were detected as positive by bacterial culture of pocket tissues. The most frequently isolated bacteria were coagulase‐negative staphylococci (76.9%). Compared with the noninfection group, more patients in the subclinical infection group were taking immunosuppressive agents, received electrode replacement, or received CIED upgrade and temporary pacing. Patients in the subclinical infection group had a higher PADIT (Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial) score. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis found that use of immunosuppressive agents (odds ratio [OR], 6.95 [95% CI, 1.44–33.51]; P=0.02) and electrode replacement or CIED upgrade (OR, 6.73 [95% CI, 2.23–20.38]; P=0.001) were significantly associated with subclinical CIED infection. Meanwhile, compared with the low‐risk group, patients in the intermediate/high‐risk group had a higher risk of subclinical CIED infection (OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 1.58–7.41]; P=0.002). After a median follow‐up time of 36.5 months, the end points between the subclinical infection group and noninfection group were as follows: composite events (58.0% versus 41.8%, P=0.03), rehospitalization (54.0% versus 32.1%, P=0.002), cardiovascular rehospitalization (32.0% versus 13.9%, P=0.001), CIED infection (2.0% versus 0.5%, P=0.32), all‐cause mortality (28.0% versus 21.5%, P=0.30), and cardiovascular mortality (10.0% versus 7.6%, P=0.57). Conclusions Subclinical CIED infection was a common phenomenon. The PADIT score had significant value for stratifying patients at high risk of subclinical CIED infection. Subclinical CIED infection was associated with increased risks of composite events, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular rehospitalization.
format article
author Gaofeng Lin
Tong Zou
Min Dong
Junpeng Liu
Wen Cui
Jiabin Tong
Haifeng Shi
Hao Chen
Jia Chong
You Lyu
Sujuan Wu
Zhilei Wang
Xin Jin
Xu Gao
Lin Sun
Yimei Qu
Jiefu Yang
author_facet Gaofeng Lin
Tong Zou
Min Dong
Junpeng Liu
Wen Cui
Jiabin Tong
Haifeng Shi
Hao Chen
Jia Chong
You Lyu
Sujuan Wu
Zhilei Wang
Xin Jin
Xu Gao
Lin Sun
Yimei Qu
Jiefu Yang
author_sort Gaofeng Lin
title Risk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture
title_short Risk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture
title_full Risk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture
title_fullStr Risk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture
title_full_unstemmed Risk Stratifying and Prognostic Analysis of Subclinical Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection: Insight From Traditional Bacterial Culture
title_sort risk stratifying and prognostic analysis of subclinical cardiac implantable electronic devices infection: insight from traditional bacterial culture
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/61d11fe4de4d434ca65e8deb1cde1a52
work_keys_str_mv AT gaofenglin riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT tongzou riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT mindong riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT junpengliu riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT wencui riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT jiabintong riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT haifengshi riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT haochen riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT jiachong riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT youlyu riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT sujuanwu riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT zhileiwang riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT xinjin riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT xugao riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT linsun riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT yimeiqu riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
AT jiefuyang riskstratifyingandprognosticanalysisofsubclinicalcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesinfectioninsightfromtraditionalbacterialculture
_version_ 1718426550839279616