The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss

In his explicitly theoretical works, Johannes Fabian, one of the key intradisciplinary "affinities" of the author-founder of postmodern anthropology, constructed a specific view of Claude Lévi-Strauss's structuralism, which, as reinterpreted by critical anthropologists, was to fundame...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miloš Milenković
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/61ddb4a7a0f945ebaeecf7ba1a22ecd8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:61ddb4a7a0f945ebaeecf7ba1a22ecd8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:61ddb4a7a0f945ebaeecf7ba1a22ecd82021-12-02T07:17:40ZThe Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/61ddb4a7a0f945ebaeecf7ba1a22ecd82016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/131https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801In his explicitly theoretical works, Johannes Fabian, one of the key intradisciplinary "affinities" of the author-founder of postmodern anthropology, constructed a specific view of Claude Lévi-Strauss's structuralism, which, as reinterpreted by critical anthropologists, was to fundamentally shape the history of anthropological post-structuralism. In order to explain that the constitution of the subject of research through research itself – i.e. "the invention of the subject of anthropology" – should be accorded the status of the crucial problem of anthropological methodology, Fabian imputed to Lévi-Strauss a rigid and amateurish preconception of research in the natural sciences as inherently positivist. The opposition structuralism/poststructuralism = positivism/postpositivism thus implied was to permanently reshape discussions on realism in critical anthropology, with absurd consequences. The most important of these was the supposedly "antirealist" character of postmodern anthropology, as a direct derivative of critical anthroplogy, which, being aware that reality is created by research, was now seen to play a somehow more ethical and less repressive part in knowledge/power games. The delight at the discovery of this methodological commonplace – that the subject of research is constituted by research itself – might have been but a matter of passing interest, being itself a common enough phenomenon, had not this particular intradisciplinary exchange led to the discrediting of the entire methodological package associated with structuralism. Paradoxically, the retaining of a realistic, radically antipositivist structural method would have made possible the achievement of the cultural-critical ambitions of postmodern anthropology's research program, had not the method been ineptly contaminated by this chain of activist reinterpretation which eventually frustrated the aims it had set out to accomplish.Miloš MilenkovićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 5, Iss 1 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle Anthropology
GN1-890
Miloš Milenković
The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss
description In his explicitly theoretical works, Johannes Fabian, one of the key intradisciplinary "affinities" of the author-founder of postmodern anthropology, constructed a specific view of Claude Lévi-Strauss's structuralism, which, as reinterpreted by critical anthropologists, was to fundamentally shape the history of anthropological post-structuralism. In order to explain that the constitution of the subject of research through research itself – i.e. "the invention of the subject of anthropology" – should be accorded the status of the crucial problem of anthropological methodology, Fabian imputed to Lévi-Strauss a rigid and amateurish preconception of research in the natural sciences as inherently positivist. The opposition structuralism/poststructuralism = positivism/postpositivism thus implied was to permanently reshape discussions on realism in critical anthropology, with absurd consequences. The most important of these was the supposedly "antirealist" character of postmodern anthropology, as a direct derivative of critical anthroplogy, which, being aware that reality is created by research, was now seen to play a somehow more ethical and less repressive part in knowledge/power games. The delight at the discovery of this methodological commonplace – that the subject of research is constituted by research itself – might have been but a matter of passing interest, being itself a common enough phenomenon, had not this particular intradisciplinary exchange led to the discrediting of the entire methodological package associated with structuralism. Paradoxically, the retaining of a realistic, radically antipositivist structural method would have made possible the achievement of the cultural-critical ambitions of postmodern anthropology's research program, had not the method been ineptly contaminated by this chain of activist reinterpretation which eventually frustrated the aims it had set out to accomplish.
format article
author Miloš Milenković
author_facet Miloš Milenković
author_sort Miloš Milenković
title The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss
title_short The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss
title_full The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss
title_fullStr The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Johannes Fabian on Claude Lévi -Strauss
title_sort influence of johannes fabian on claude lévi -strauss
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/61ddb4a7a0f945ebaeecf7ba1a22ecd8
work_keys_str_mv AT milosmilenkovic theinfluenceofjohannesfabianonclaudelevistrauss
AT milosmilenkovic influenceofjohannesfabianonclaudelevistrauss
_version_ 1718399517754130432