A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”

The text scrutinizes Heidegger's attempt of ontological analysis of three linguistical roots of the term “being” (es-, bhu-, wes-) from The Freiburg lectures (1935). In author's opinion, Heidegger deliberately ignored the presence of the roots and their modifications in the Slavic language...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	B. Bratina
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2013
Materias:	m. heidegger ontological and linguistic analysis “being” sethmantic potential of the concept slavic cultures marginalization political and ideological engagement ideology of racism philosophical truth International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/61f1b3ffb06a4e44874db9ded9474068
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:61f1b3ffb06a4e44874db9ded9474068
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:61f1b3ffb06a4e44874db9ded94740682021-11-23T14:50:55ZA SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2013-5-32-221-226https://doaj.org/article/61f1b3ffb06a4e44874db9ded94740682013-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1230https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099The text scrutinizes Heidegger's attempt of ontological analysis of three linguistical roots of the term “being” (es-, bhu-, wes-) from The Freiburg lectures (1935). In author's opinion, Heidegger deliberately ignored the presence of the roots and their modifications in the Slavic languages. Notional and even ideological reasons of such «inattention» are pressumed, the reasons which determine linguistic conclusions of German philosopher (and not the other way around, as supposed when stated that linguistic bacame an absolutely independent scientific means of Heidegger's ontological «investigations»).At the same time, the author argues for an independent ontological and linguistic analysis of Slavic languages, to fill the philogophical «gapes», originated from ignoring the rich semantic content of those languages. The linguistic richness of Slavic radices is one of so far loosely developped means of knowing the important philosophical notions, including the notion «being». Turning the attention towards ethimological components of ontological and linguistical analysis is, of course, one of Heidegger's merits. But the different perspectives of that endevour, which show up in research of Slavic culture's material, radically change the practical concequences of those theses in the cultural and political plane. On the whole, they prevent the insight into aspirations of some contemporary political powers in marginalizing the Slavic cultures, ignoring their real position in global comunity, as well as the contributon of the Slavic cultures to the tresury of world cultures.The most important conclusion of the article is stressing of necessity to consider political conditionalities (residua) in philosophical positions, which the authors themselves are often unaware of. Calling to intellectual consciousness, Boris Bratina convincingly substantiates the methodological and research of content that follows from given positions.B. BratinaMGIMO University Pressarticlem. heideggerontological and linguistic analysis“being”sethmantic potential of the conceptslavic culturesmarginalizationpolitical and ideological engagementideology of racismphilosophical truthInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 5(32), Pp 221-226 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	m. heidegger ontological and linguistic analysis “being” sethmantic potential of the concept slavic cultures marginalization political and ideological engagement ideology of racism philosophical truth International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	m. heidegger ontological and linguistic analysis “being” sethmantic potential of the concept slavic cultures marginalization political and ideological engagement ideology of racism philosophical truth International relations JZ2-6530 B. Bratina A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”
description	The text scrutinizes Heidegger's attempt of ontological analysis of three linguistical roots of the term “being” (es-, bhu-, wes-) from The Freiburg lectures (1935). In author's opinion, Heidegger deliberately ignored the presence of the roots and their modifications in the Slavic languages. Notional and even ideological reasons of such «inattention» are pressumed, the reasons which determine linguistic conclusions of German philosopher (and not the other way around, as supposed when stated that linguistic bacame an absolutely independent scientific means of Heidegger's ontological «investigations»).At the same time, the author argues for an independent ontological and linguistic analysis of Slavic languages, to fill the philogophical «gapes», originated from ignoring the rich semantic content of those languages. The linguistic richness of Slavic radices is one of so far loosely developped means of knowing the important philosophical notions, including the notion «being». Turning the attention towards ethimological components of ontological and linguistical analysis is, of course, one of Heidegger's merits. But the different perspectives of that endevour, which show up in research of Slavic culture's material, radically change the practical concequences of those theses in the cultural and political plane. On the whole, they prevent the insight into aspirations of some contemporary political powers in marginalizing the Slavic cultures, ignoring their real position in global comunity, as well as the contributon of the Slavic cultures to the tresury of world cultures.The most important conclusion of the article is stressing of necessity to consider political conditionalities (residua) in philosophical positions, which the authors themselves are often unaware of. Calling to intellectual consciousness, Boris Bratina convincingly substantiates the methodological and research of content that follows from given positions.
format	article
author	B. Bratina
author_facet	B. Bratina
author_sort	B. Bratina
title	A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”
title_short	A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”
title_full	A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”
title_fullStr	A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”
title_full_unstemmed	A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”
title_sort	short criticism of heidegger's ontological analysis of the term “being”
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/61f1b3ffb06a4e44874db9ded9474068
work_keys_str_mv	AT bbratina ashortcriticismofheideggersontologicalanalysisofthetermbeing AT bbratina shortcriticismofheideggersontologicalanalysisofthetermbeing
_version_	1718416398042005504

A SHORT CRITICISM OF HEIDEGGER'S ONTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TERM “BEING”

Ejemplares similares