Experience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results

The traditional way of engaging the public with the past has changed: now, through experimental archaeology, we can have a direct, physical contact with the “past”. But, as researchers know, the means used to engage the public are the fruits of an active process of investigation, especially in exper...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lara Comis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: EXARC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/61f4fbeb859647fbad7b17b1944e8a69
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:61f4fbeb859647fbad7b17b1944e8a69
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:61f4fbeb859647fbad7b17b1944e8a692021-12-01T14:42:33ZExperience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results2212-8956https://doaj.org/article/61f4fbeb859647fbad7b17b1944e8a692019-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10422https://doaj.org/toc/2212-8956The traditional way of engaging the public with the past has changed: now, through experimental archaeology, we can have a direct, physical contact with the “past”. But, as researchers know, the means used to engage the public are the fruits of an active process of investigation, especially in experimental archaeology. Could it be possible to enable visitors to actively engage in the questioning of the past, to let them experience the discovery process? In this paper, which illustrates the work-in-progress of my PhD (Exploring the uses of Experimental Archaeology at European AOAMs, IRC GOIPG/2017, UCD, Dublin IE), the preliminary results of a qualitative inquiry on experimental archaeology best practices will be illustrated. The study is observing the experimental archaeology phenomenon from a social science perspective highlighting the interactions existing among three major categories (AOAMs, Academic Institutions, and Independent Activities). In detail, the survey was designed to produce data on the meaning constellations under the umbrella term “experimental archaeology”, to explore research potential in the dynamic among the categories under scrutiny, and to provide a baseline for the mapping of job market interactions.Lara ComisEXARCarticlemethodologyexperimental archaeologypublicarchaeological open-air museumuniversitynewest erairelandMuseums. Collectors and collectingAM1-501ArchaeologyCC1-960ENEXARC Journal, Iss 2019/2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic methodology
experimental archaeology
public
archaeological open-air museum
university
newest era
ireland
Museums. Collectors and collecting
AM1-501
Archaeology
CC1-960
spellingShingle methodology
experimental archaeology
public
archaeological open-air museum
university
newest era
ireland
Museums. Collectors and collecting
AM1-501
Archaeology
CC1-960
Lara Comis
Experience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results
description The traditional way of engaging the public with the past has changed: now, through experimental archaeology, we can have a direct, physical contact with the “past”. But, as researchers know, the means used to engage the public are the fruits of an active process of investigation, especially in experimental archaeology. Could it be possible to enable visitors to actively engage in the questioning of the past, to let them experience the discovery process? In this paper, which illustrates the work-in-progress of my PhD (Exploring the uses of Experimental Archaeology at European AOAMs, IRC GOIPG/2017, UCD, Dublin IE), the preliminary results of a qualitative inquiry on experimental archaeology best practices will be illustrated. The study is observing the experimental archaeology phenomenon from a social science perspective highlighting the interactions existing among three major categories (AOAMs, Academic Institutions, and Independent Activities). In detail, the survey was designed to produce data on the meaning constellations under the umbrella term “experimental archaeology”, to explore research potential in the dynamic among the categories under scrutiny, and to provide a baseline for the mapping of job market interactions.
format article
author Lara Comis
author_facet Lara Comis
author_sort Lara Comis
title Experience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results
title_short Experience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results
title_full Experience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results
title_fullStr Experience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results
title_full_unstemmed Experience and Discovery: Engaging the Public in Research. A Survey on Experimental Archaeology Contemporary Practice and Meaning – Preliminary Results
title_sort experience and discovery: engaging the public in research. a survey on experimental archaeology contemporary practice and meaning – preliminary results
publisher EXARC
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/61f4fbeb859647fbad7b17b1944e8a69
work_keys_str_mv AT laracomis experienceanddiscoveryengagingthepublicinresearchasurveyonexperimentalarchaeologycontemporarypracticeandmeaningpreliminaryresults
_version_ 1718404936042020864