Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice

The previous three essays (Jennings 2019) and the first in this second series were originally drafted 30 years ago in 1988-1990. They aimed to present a more realistic concept of choice in economics. These four essays serve as a precursor to my subsequent work. The first three essays (Jennings 201...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Frederic B. JENNINGS JR.
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
Publicado: Editura ASE Bucuresti 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/620cc13f39fb43f0ae4d36c1a8fe50db
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:620cc13f39fb43f0ae4d36c1a8fe50db
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:620cc13f39fb43f0ae4d36c1a8fe50db2021-12-02T15:16:26ZEconomic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice1843-22981844-8208https://doaj.org/article/620cc13f39fb43f0ae4d36c1a8fe50db2020-11-01T00:00:00Z https://jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=8789 https://doaj.org/toc/1843-2298https://doaj.org/toc/1844-8208The previous three essays (Jennings 2019) and the first in this second series were originally drafted 30 years ago in 1988-1990. They aimed to present a more realistic concept of choice in economics. These four essays serve as a precursor to my subsequent work. The first three essays (Jennings 2019) addressed these issues. Essay One started with the notion of ‘opportunity cost’ and the ‘problem of invisibility’ as a case for open discourse. The second essay introduced two metaphors for economic behavior: the ‘neighborhood store’ and the ‘chessboard’, to raise issues of incomplete knowledge, time and social process. The third essay focused on interdependence: a ‘transport’ metaphor shows a balance of substitution and complementarity, opening institutional questions of competition and cooperation. These three essays set up an ethical theory of planning horizons. The fourth essay outlines a theory of ethics based on rational bounds. The endless interdependence of choice makes rational limits essential; surprises show the border of prior awareness of radiant outcomes. Our ethics align private with social incentives; wherever relations show affinity, competition is self-defeating: cooperation is more efficient, especially in education. Learning extends horizons, suggesting the failure of rivalrous systems. How incentives shape planning horizons is central to social well-being. The fifth essay develops this view with regard to institutions. Where substitution is not the basic character of our relations, competition fails. We see rivalry as productive and think ‘collusion’ is suspect, on an assumption of opposition with no room for consilient aims. But am I discomfited by your success or enriched thereby? Substitution may not be so general, if cooperation expands our horizons in a complementary way. The sixth essay poses a horizonal research agenda. How incentives shape behavior is central to well-being. Substitution and competition lead to fragmentation, when nothing complete can be understood through isolated design. Everything connects, so we must approach understanding thus. Economics – severed from honor, ethics, civilization, climate and ecological loss – cannot grasp these horizonal issues. Our short attention spans bring harm; competitive frames support a myopic culture in self-destruct mode. This is where substitution has failed; a cultural evolution is needed, starting with realistic concepts of choice.Frederic B. JENNINGS JR.Editura ASE Bucurestiarticlerealismchoicecompetitioncooperationsubstitutioncomplementarityplanning horizonsinstitutionsethicsconscience bounded rationalityEconomics as a scienceHB71-74DEENFRJournal of Philosophical Economics, Vol XIII, Iss 2, Pp 1-57 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
topic realism
choice
competition
cooperation
substitution
complementarity
planning horizons
institutions
ethics
conscience
bounded rationality
Economics as a science
HB71-74
spellingShingle realism
choice
competition
cooperation
substitution
complementarity
planning horizons
institutions
ethics
conscience
bounded rationality
Economics as a science
HB71-74
Frederic B. JENNINGS JR.
Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
description The previous three essays (Jennings 2019) and the first in this second series were originally drafted 30 years ago in 1988-1990. They aimed to present a more realistic concept of choice in economics. These four essays serve as a precursor to my subsequent work. The first three essays (Jennings 2019) addressed these issues. Essay One started with the notion of ‘opportunity cost’ and the ‘problem of invisibility’ as a case for open discourse. The second essay introduced two metaphors for economic behavior: the ‘neighborhood store’ and the ‘chessboard’, to raise issues of incomplete knowledge, time and social process. The third essay focused on interdependence: a ‘transport’ metaphor shows a balance of substitution and complementarity, opening institutional questions of competition and cooperation. These three essays set up an ethical theory of planning horizons. The fourth essay outlines a theory of ethics based on rational bounds. The endless interdependence of choice makes rational limits essential; surprises show the border of prior awareness of radiant outcomes. Our ethics align private with social incentives; wherever relations show affinity, competition is self-defeating: cooperation is more efficient, especially in education. Learning extends horizons, suggesting the failure of rivalrous systems. How incentives shape planning horizons is central to social well-being. The fifth essay develops this view with regard to institutions. Where substitution is not the basic character of our relations, competition fails. We see rivalry as productive and think ‘collusion’ is suspect, on an assumption of opposition with no room for consilient aims. But am I discomfited by your success or enriched thereby? Substitution may not be so general, if cooperation expands our horizons in a complementary way. The sixth essay poses a horizonal research agenda. How incentives shape behavior is central to well-being. Substitution and competition lead to fragmentation, when nothing complete can be understood through isolated design. Everything connects, so we must approach understanding thus. Economics – severed from honor, ethics, civilization, climate and ecological loss – cannot grasp these horizonal issues. Our short attention spans bring harm; competitive frames support a myopic culture in self-destruct mode. This is where substitution has failed; a cultural evolution is needed, starting with realistic concepts of choice.
format article
author Frederic B. JENNINGS JR.
author_facet Frederic B. JENNINGS JR.
author_sort Frederic B. JENNINGS JR.
title Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
title_short Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
title_full Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
title_fullStr Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
title_full_unstemmed Economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
title_sort economic essays (part two): toward a realistic concept of choice
publisher Editura ASE Bucuresti
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/620cc13f39fb43f0ae4d36c1a8fe50db
work_keys_str_mv AT fredericbjenningsjr economicessaysparttwotowardarealisticconceptofchoice
_version_ 1718387448448286720