Impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia

Migratory sheldgeese (continental Upland Goose Chloephaga picta, Ashy-headed Goose C. poliocephala, and continental Ruddy-headed Goose C. rubidiceps) are endemic birds of southern South America. They are currently threatened by illegal hunting, overgrazing, and invasive predators. Because their bree...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natalia A. Cossa, Laura Fasola, Ignacio Roesler, Juan C. Reboreda
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/626cd236bf034c558771229d5ebb7752
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:626cd236bf034c558771229d5ebb7752
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:626cd236bf034c558771229d5ebb77522021-12-02T18:06:21ZImpacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia1712-6568https://doaj.org/article/626cd236bf034c558771229d5ebb77522020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ace-eco.org/vol15/iss2/art1/https://doaj.org/toc/1712-6568Migratory sheldgeese (continental Upland Goose Chloephaga picta, Ashy-headed Goose C. poliocephala, and continental Ruddy-headed Goose C. rubidiceps) are endemic birds of southern South America. They are currently threatened by illegal hunting, overgrazing, and invasive predators. Because their breeding area is intensely grazed by sheep and cows, we studied the interaction of sheldgeese flocks and breeding pairs with livestock in the Tierra del Fuego and Santa Cruz provinces in Patagonia, Argentina. We conducted road-based surveys of sheldgeese flocks and breeding pairs from spring 2013 to summer 2016 to explore sheldgeese behavior. In addition, we monitored Upland Goose nests using camera traps and estimated nest daily survival rates in nests unprotected and protected from livestock with an electric fence. Sheldgeese flocks and breeding pairs were more frequently sighted alone than associated with livestock. Also, when sheldgeese foraged alongside livestock, there were fewer individuals resting and these allocated more time to forage than in the absence of livestock. We did not observe lower individual vigilance in sheldgeese flocks sharing foraging patches with livestock. Nests protected by electric fences had higher daily survival rates than unprotected ones. Our results indicate that one important conservation action should be to identify areas that concentrate a great number of breeding pairs of sheldgeese, and protect them from livestock, mainly during the peak of the reproductive season.Natalia A. CossaLaura FasolaIgnacio RoeslerJuan C. ReboredaResilience Alliancearticlebehaviorchloephagaconservationendangered specieslivestocknest successsheldgeesePlant cultureSB1-1110Environmental sciencesGE1-350Plant ecologyQK900-989ENAvian Conservation and Ecology, Vol 15, Iss 2, p 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic behavior
chloephaga
conservation
endangered species
livestock
nest success
sheldgeese
Plant culture
SB1-1110
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Plant ecology
QK900-989
spellingShingle behavior
chloephaga
conservation
endangered species
livestock
nest success
sheldgeese
Plant culture
SB1-1110
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Plant ecology
QK900-989
Natalia A. Cossa
Laura Fasola
Ignacio Roesler
Juan C. Reboreda
Impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia
description Migratory sheldgeese (continental Upland Goose Chloephaga picta, Ashy-headed Goose C. poliocephala, and continental Ruddy-headed Goose C. rubidiceps) are endemic birds of southern South America. They are currently threatened by illegal hunting, overgrazing, and invasive predators. Because their breeding area is intensely grazed by sheep and cows, we studied the interaction of sheldgeese flocks and breeding pairs with livestock in the Tierra del Fuego and Santa Cruz provinces in Patagonia, Argentina. We conducted road-based surveys of sheldgeese flocks and breeding pairs from spring 2013 to summer 2016 to explore sheldgeese behavior. In addition, we monitored Upland Goose nests using camera traps and estimated nest daily survival rates in nests unprotected and protected from livestock with an electric fence. Sheldgeese flocks and breeding pairs were more frequently sighted alone than associated with livestock. Also, when sheldgeese foraged alongside livestock, there were fewer individuals resting and these allocated more time to forage than in the absence of livestock. We did not observe lower individual vigilance in sheldgeese flocks sharing foraging patches with livestock. Nests protected by electric fences had higher daily survival rates than unprotected ones. Our results indicate that one important conservation action should be to identify areas that concentrate a great number of breeding pairs of sheldgeese, and protect them from livestock, mainly during the peak of the reproductive season.
format article
author Natalia A. Cossa
Laura Fasola
Ignacio Roesler
Juan C. Reboreda
author_facet Natalia A. Cossa
Laura Fasola
Ignacio Roesler
Juan C. Reboreda
author_sort Natalia A. Cossa
title Impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia
title_short Impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia
title_full Impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia
title_fullStr Impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (Chloephaga spp.) in Patagonia
title_sort impacts of traditional livestock farming on threatened sheldgeese (chloephaga spp.) in patagonia
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/626cd236bf034c558771229d5ebb7752
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliaacossa impactsoftraditionallivestockfarmingonthreatenedsheldgeesechloephagasppinpatagonia
AT laurafasola impactsoftraditionallivestockfarmingonthreatenedsheldgeesechloephagasppinpatagonia
AT ignacioroesler impactsoftraditionallivestockfarmingonthreatenedsheldgeesechloephagasppinpatagonia
AT juancreboreda impactsoftraditionallivestockfarmingonthreatenedsheldgeesechloephagasppinpatagonia
_version_ 1718378632184856576