Comparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures

The present study focuses on the impact of graphic symbols used in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) on clause construction. It is not yet well-understood to what extent communication produced via graphic symbols differs from verbal production. This study attempts shed light on the im...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gat Savaldi-Harussi, Leah Fostick
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/62707da71956448ea89426f928f44e2e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:62707da71956448ea89426f928f44e2e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:62707da71956448ea89426f928f44e2e2021-12-02T11:56:10ZComparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.702652https://doaj.org/article/62707da71956448ea89426f928f44e2e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702652/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078The present study focuses on the impact of graphic symbols used in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) on clause construction. It is not yet well-understood to what extent communication produced via graphic symbols differs from verbal production. This study attempts shed light on the impact of the graphic symbol modality on message construction beyond individual differences, language knowledge, and language-specific patterns by providing a direct comparison between children’s verbal and graphic symbol production. Nineteen typically developing Hebrew-speaking children aged 4–5 years were presented with 16 short videos of actions and were asked to express what they saw verbally and by choosing among graphic symbols displayed on an iPad communication board. The 570 clauses produced by the children were coded and analyzed. A significant difference was found in favor of verbal speech across different syntactic structures in terms of utilization of the target lexicon, syntactic complexity, and expected target word order. These results are consistent with the existing literature for English. Implications for AAC practices are discussed, highlighting the notion that using graphic symbols to represent spoken language may not reflect actual linguistic knowledge and that adequate, explicit instruction is necessary for graphic representation of more complex linguistic structures.Gat Savaldi-HarussiLeah FostickFrontiers Media S.A.articleexpressive use of graphic symbolsclause constructionaugmentative and alternative communicationgraphic symbol modalitynative speakerstransitive and non-transitive verbsPsychologyBF1-990ENFrontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic expressive use of graphic symbols
clause construction
augmentative and alternative communication
graphic symbol modality
native speakers
transitive and non-transitive verbs
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle expressive use of graphic symbols
clause construction
augmentative and alternative communication
graphic symbol modality
native speakers
transitive and non-transitive verbs
Psychology
BF1-990
Gat Savaldi-Harussi
Leah Fostick
Comparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures
description The present study focuses on the impact of graphic symbols used in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) on clause construction. It is not yet well-understood to what extent communication produced via graphic symbols differs from verbal production. This study attempts shed light on the impact of the graphic symbol modality on message construction beyond individual differences, language knowledge, and language-specific patterns by providing a direct comparison between children’s verbal and graphic symbol production. Nineteen typically developing Hebrew-speaking children aged 4–5 years were presented with 16 short videos of actions and were asked to express what they saw verbally and by choosing among graphic symbols displayed on an iPad communication board. The 570 clauses produced by the children were coded and analyzed. A significant difference was found in favor of verbal speech across different syntactic structures in terms of utilization of the target lexicon, syntactic complexity, and expected target word order. These results are consistent with the existing literature for English. Implications for AAC practices are discussed, highlighting the notion that using graphic symbols to represent spoken language may not reflect actual linguistic knowledge and that adequate, explicit instruction is necessary for graphic representation of more complex linguistic structures.
format article
author Gat Savaldi-Harussi
Leah Fostick
author_facet Gat Savaldi-Harussi
Leah Fostick
author_sort Gat Savaldi-Harussi
title Comparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures
title_short Comparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures
title_full Comparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures
title_fullStr Comparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Preschooler Verbal and Graphic Symbol Production Across Different Syntactic Structures
title_sort comparison of preschooler verbal and graphic symbol production across different syntactic structures
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/62707da71956448ea89426f928f44e2e
work_keys_str_mv AT gatsavaldiharussi comparisonofpreschoolerverbalandgraphicsymbolproductionacrossdifferentsyntacticstructures
AT leahfostick comparisonofpreschoolerverbalandgraphicsymbolproductionacrossdifferentsyntacticstructures
_version_ 1718394809216925696